Tag Archives: Social dialogue

European cross-industry social dialogue

European cross-industry social dialogue

Outline of the Community (European Union) legislation about European cross-industry social dialogue

Topics

These categories group together and put in context the legislative and non-legislative initiatives which deal with the same topic.

Employment and social policy > Social dialogue and employee participation

European cross-industry social dialogue

Tripartite cross-industry social dialogue

Tripartite social dialogue is conducted between wage earners, employers and the European institutions. It essentially takes place at cross-industry level, on political and technical issues, particularly in areas such macroeconomic policies, employment, social security, education and training.

This type of dialogue aims at ensuring the effective participation of social partners in implementing the European Union’s (EU) economic and social policies. As such, the European social partners meet at the Tripartite Social Summit for Growth and Employment, the role of which is laid down in Article 152 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU (TFEU). They may also get together within working groups and at specific seminars.

Bipartite cross-industry social dialogue

Bipartite social dialogue is conducted between social partner organisations. At cross-industry level it takes place principally within the Social Dialogue Committee (SDC).

Under the framework of their cooperation, the social partners may adopt agreements which are implemented in the Member States through national procedures and practices (Article 155 of the TFEU).

In addition, in certain areas the social partners may request that their agreements be adopted in the form of a Decision by the Council, following a proposal by the Commission and informing the European Parliament. This procedure can only be implemented in the areas listed in Article 153 of the TFEU: for example, it relates to working conditions, health and safety of workers, social security, protection in the case of termination of an employment contract, etc.

European social partners

At cross-industry level, European workers are represented by:

  • the European Trade Union Confederation (CES/ETUC);
  • the CEC European Managers;
  • EUROCADRES;

European employers are represented by:

  • BUSINESSEUROPE;
  • the European Association of Craft, Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (UEAPME);
  • the European Centre of Enterprises with Public Participation and of Enterprises of General Economic Interest (CEEP).

Tripartite Social Summit for Growth and Employment

Tripartite Social Summit for Growth and Employment

Outline of the Community (European Union) legislation about Tripartite Social Summit for Growth and Employment

Topics

These categories group together and put in context the legislative and non-legislative initiatives which deal with the same topic.

Employment and social policy > Social dialogue and employee participation

Tripartite Social Summit for Growth and Employment

Document or Iniciative

Council Decision 2003/174/EC of 6March2003 establishing a Tripartite Social Summit for Growth and Employment.

Summary

The task of the Tripartite Social Summit is to ensure social dialogue between European institutions and employers’ and workers’ representatives. The Summit takes place within the context of cross-industry dialogue. Its agenda therefore includes issues affecting all economic sectors and workers within the European Union (EU).

In addition, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) henceforth recognises the Summit’s contribution to the proper conduct of European social dialogue (Article152).

Operation

The Summit meets at least once a year, before the spring European Council. It brings together representatives of:

  • the Council Presidency and the two subsequent Presidencies;
  • the Commission;
  • the social partners, who are divided into two delegations of equal size comprising 10workers’ representatives and 10employers’ representatives.

The agenda for the Summit is determined jointly by the representatives of the institutions and the social partners.

Background

The Social Summit replaced the Standing Committee on Employment following a joint decision of the social partners at the Laeken Summit in December 2001.

It institutionalises the informal social summits held since December 2000 in the context of the Lisbon Strategy for Jobs and Growth.

References

Act Entry into force Deadline for transposition in the Member States Official Journal

Decision 2003/174/EC

6.3.2003

OJ L 70, 14.3.2003

European social dialogue: a force for innovation and change

European social dialogue: a force for innovation and change

Outline of the Community (European Union) legislation about European social dialogue: a force for innovation and change

Topics

These categories group together and put in context the legislative and non-legislative initiatives which deal with the same topic.

Employment and social policy > Social dialogue and employee participation

European social dialogue: a force for innovation and change

Document or Iniciative

Communication from the Commission of 26 June 2002 – European social dialogue, a force for innovation and change [COM(2002) 341 final – Not published in the Official Journal].

Summary

The Commission presents a set of guidelines aimed at strengthening the social dialogue, in other words the social partners’ contribution to the work of the public institutions, in order to improve public governance and economic and social reform within the European Union (EU).

Developing the social dialogue within the EU

First, the Commission wishes to increase the consultation of the social partners in the drafting of European legislation. Consulting the social partners is compulsory in the areas of employment and social policy but optional concerning sectoral issues and the transposition of European legislation at national level.

The Commission is keen to extend this consultation to all legislative initiatives having social repercussions. It will also improve the procedures and rules for consultation.

In addition, the effectiveness of the social dialogue is linked to the representativeness of the social partners at European level. The Commission therefore encourages co-operation between national organisations and the improvement of their internal governance.

The social partners are also encouraged to broaden and enhance the social dialogue by concluding more agreements to be integrated into European law and by developing the processes for sectoral and intersectoral dialogue.

The Commission wishes to raise the profile of the results of European social dialogue. For example, it will organise meetings at EU level and within the Member States but will also distribute information by publishing regular reports and setting up a specific Internet site.

Finally, the EU supports the improvement of social dialogue at all levels of governance. The Commission therefore proposes, in particular, to improve training for the European social partners and representatives of national authorities, and to promote local social dialogue and corporate social responsibility.

Contribution to growth and employment

The actions of the social partners contribute to the attainment of the growth and employment goals set by the Lisbon Strategy. These goals are associated in particular with the management of change in the organisation of work, employee training, the promotion of equal opportunities and active ageing policies.

In this context, the Commission will analyse and compare the quality of industrial relations in the various Member States. It also proposes that the social partners should be assisted by Member States and by European financing in the introduction of policies associated with the Lisbon Strategy.

This Communication also proposes to set up a Tripartite Social Summit for Growth and Employment, bringing together the troika of Heads of State or Government, the Commission President and a restricted delegation of social partners.

International co-operation

Countries committed to the EU enlargement process must structure and build the capacities of their organisations of social partners. In this respect, candidate countries may benefit from co-operation with European organisations and from European financing.

In addition, the processes of social dialogue must be encouraged in the context of EU foreign policy. The social partners of the EU and non-Member States may exchange experience and best practice, particularly concerning the countries of the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership, the EU Partnership with Latin America, with the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries, and with the United States and Japan.

Lastly, the European social partners can play a role as experts in the context of multilateral negotiations, particularly within international organisations.

Related Acts

Communication from the Commission of 20 May 1998 adapting and promoting the social dialogue at Community level [COM(98) 322 final – Not published in the Official Journal].

Communication from the Commission of 18 September 1996 concerning the Development of the Social Dialogue at Community level [COM(96) 448 final – Not published in the Official Journal].

Communication from the Commission of 14 December 1993 concerning the application of the Agreement on social policy presented by the Commission to the Council and to the European Parliament [COM(93) 600 final – Not published in the Official Journal].

2006 Report on Industrial Relations in Europe

2006 Report on Industrial Relations in Europe

Outline of the Community (European Union) legislation about 2006 Report on Industrial Relations in Europe

Topics

These categories group together and put in context the legislative and non-legislative initiatives which deal with the same topic.

Employment and social policy > Social dialogue and employee participation

2006 Report on Industrial Relations in Europe

Document or Iniciative

Report of the European Commission Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities – Industrial Relations in Europe 2006 [Not published in the Official Journal].

Summary

Social dialogue is a social policy tool, which has particular importance in the revision of the Lisbon Strategy adopted in 2005. In fact, the participation of social partners is essential in achieving the Strategy objectives and making the European Union (EU) the most competitive knowledge economy in the world.

Employee representation and the capacity of employers’ organisations varies depending on the Member State. As such union density, defined as the ratio between actual and potential membership, is generally lower in southern Europe and in Central and Eastern Europe. This density also varies depending on the sector of activity, gender or age of employees. The power and structure of employers’ organisations are also relatively diverse. Their density is generally higher than that of trade unions, except in the Nordic countries.

Autonomous collective agreements enable a free definition of wage policies and working conditions and can be used to establish social rights. The current trend is for agreements to be used to derogate from some legal standards.

Employee representation in the workplace is one of the distinctive features of the Community’s industrial relations system. Differences exist between Member States in terms of the structure of national representation models, but also in terms of sector of activity, establishment size and occupational category. Lack of representation is more significant in the private sector than in the public sector. The requirement for informing and consulting workers is regulated by Directive 2002/14/EC.

Building the capacity of new Member States and candidate countries to manage industrial relations is a priority, pursued through technical cooperation actions. In particular, these actions aim at encouraging the participation of social partners in fora at European level and strengthening tripartite dialogue at national level.

The 20th anniversary of the launch of the European social dialogue presented an opportunity to assess its progress, which is characterised by an increased autonomy of European social partners. This Report highlights the importance of tripartite dialogue in meeting the Lisbon objectives. In particular, bilateral dialogue is used for implementing flexicurity and lifelong learning models, as well as the autonomous European framework agreement on teleworking. The multi-annual work programme for European social dialogue (2006-2008) should encourage future progress.

Between 2004 and 2006 Community legislation was developed in different sectors. Directives were adopted in the areas of health and safety at work, regarding the exposure of workers to electromagnetic fields, to carcinogens and mutagens and to artificial optical radiation. The Agreement on mobile workers carrying out cross-border interoperability services was implemented by Directive 2005/47/EC. In 2005 the Commission presented a Communication on employment and restructuring companies. In addition, a new Directive regulates cross-border mergers of companies and employee consultation procedures.

Progress has also been made in tackling discrimination and equal treatment in matters of employment. Provisions relating to mobility, workers’ right to residency and the coordination of social security schemes have been simplified. Since 2006 E-forms have been replaced by the European health insurance card for European Union (EC) and European Economic Area (EEA) citizens.

The labour market of today is moving towards greater flexibility, atypical working conditions and increased diversity in terms of contracts and working hours. Employment flexibility could present a risk to social cohesion. Together with other risk factors, it could result in the creation of vulnerable situations.

Flexibility should be balanced out by different factors such as economic growth, stable job creation, internal flexibility in companies and improving the quality of work. If economic results cannot be directly linked to a social dialogue model, industrial relations systems with strong union representation and where the social partners participate in the political process tend to be more competitive. This is the case when trade unions and employers’ organisations act in a coordinated way.

2008 Report on Industrial Relations in Europe

2008 Report on Industrial Relations in Europe

Outline of the Community (European Union) legislation about 2008 Report on Industrial Relations in Europe

Topics

These categories group together and put in context the legislative and non-legislative initiatives which deal with the same topic.

Employment and social policy > Social dialogue and employee participation

2008 Report on Industrial Relations in Europe

Document or Iniciative

Report of the European Commission Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities – Industrial Relations in Europe 2008 [Not published in the Official Journal].

Summary

The diversity of national social dialogue mechanisms has increased with the enlargement of the European Union (EU). These particularities depend notably on the nature of the social partner organisations, on their autonomy in relation to the State and the role of tripartite agreements.

At European level industrial relations developed in parallel with the emergence of European social policy and through the gradual inclusion of European social partners (ETUC, BUSINESSEUROPE, UEAPME and CEEP) in the legislative process.
Collective bargaining and wage setting remains within national jurisdiction. However, European coordination of non-wage bargaining is on the increase, as is the conclusion of European autonomous agreements and transnational bargaining.

Implementation in European social dialogue is based on agreements reached through the Council Directive or on European autonomous agreements. The growing autonomy of social partners implies their involvement in implementing and monitoring these agreements. Other types of text may serve as frameworks of actions, such as recommendations and guidelines, which are implemented on a voluntary basis.
The participation of social partners in the renewed Lisbon Strategy is essential at all levels of policy decision-making. National social partners are actively involved in concluding pacts with governments and in implementing Community programmes and policies. European social partners support the Lisbon objectives through their 2006-2008 work programme. They have negotiated several European framework agreements, as well as joint opinions and frameworks of action.

The contribution of social partners is essential in implementing the Lisbon Strategy and the principles of flexicurity, considering their capacity for autonomous action and their areas of expertise, such as:

  • active labour market policy and social security reforms;
  • training and employment of young people;
  • lifelong learning and older workers;
  • working hours and flexibility;
  • the reconciliation of work and family;
  • working conditions.

The development of European social dialogue between 2006 and 2008 was based on the results of a joint analysis of the labour market by cross-industry actors. This enabled a consensus to be reached at the European Council in December 2007 on common principles of flexicurity.

Social partners have continued their autonomous actions, most notably with the conclusion of a framework agreement on harassment and violence at work. Other autonomous agreements are currently under negotiation regarding parental leave, inclusion in the labour market and maritime labour standards. Guidelines on promoting gender equality, cross-border mobility and health and safety at work have been adopted under the framework of the sectoral social dialogue. Social partners have also engaged in dialogue in the sectors of professional football and contract catering.

With regard to legislative progress between 2006and 2008, the Council has reached political agreement to revise the Working Time Directive and the Directive on temporary agency work. The Commission presented a Proposal on European Works Councils (EWCs) intended to improve the effectiveness of employees’ transnational information and consultation rights and their legal certainty. The implementation of some legislative provisions was re-examined, such as the posting of workers Directive (followed by recommendations on cooperation between national administrations), the Directives on transfers of undertakings, the Directive on fixed-term work and the Directive on employer’s insolvency. In 2006 discussions were initiated by the Green Paper on Modernisation of Labour Law. In addition, a new 2007-2013 strategy on health and safety at work was launched.

Building social partner capacity is required in order to contribute towards good working conditions, competitiveness and social cohesion. The 2007-2013 European Social Fund (ESF) Programme provides direct financial support for building partner capacity. The fund also supports joint projects developed by social partners in the areas of lifelong learning and labour-market modernisation. Specific effort has been made in the new EU Member States and in the western Balkans.

Social dialogue and employee participation

Social dialogue and employee participation

Outline of the Community (European Union) legislation about Social dialogue and employee participation

Topics

These categories group together and put in context the legislative and non-legislative initiatives which deal with the same topic.

Employment and social policy > Social dialogue and employee participation

Social dialogue and employee participation

Dialogue with the social partners constitutes one of the pillars of the European social model. Firmly anchored in the Treaty establishing the European Community, it embraces discussions, consultations, negotiations and joint actions involving the representative social partner organisations. The European social dialogue, which can be bipartite or tripartite, supplements the national social dialogue arrangements which exist in most Member States. Based on the principles of solidarity, responsibility and participation, it constitutes the main channel through which the social partners contribute to the establishing of European social standards and play a vital role in the governance of the Union.

EUROPEAN SOCIAL DIALOGUE

  • Enhancing the contribution of European social dialogue in an enlarged Europe
  • European social dialogue: a force for innovation and change
  • 2010 Report on industrial relations in Europe
  • 2008 Report on Industrial Relations in Europe
  • 2006 Report on Industrial Relations in Europe

CROSS-INDUSTRY SOCIAL DIALOGUE

  • European cross-industry social dialogue

Framework agreements

  • Parental leave
  • Parental leave and leave for family reasons
  • Part-time working
  • Fixed-term work
  • Equal treatment of temporary workers
  • Teleworking

SECTORAL SOCIAL DIALOGUE

  • European Sectoral Dialogue
  • Reassessing the regulatory social framework for more and better seafaring jobs in the EU
  • Organisation of seafarers’ working time
  • Organisation of working time of mobile workers in civil aviation
  • Working conditions of mobile workers engaged in interoperable cross-border services in the railway sector

FORUM FOR SOCIAL DIALOGUE

  • Tripartite Social Summit for Growth and Employment
  • Employment Committee

INFORMATION, CONSULTATION AND PARTICIPATION OF EMPLOYEES

  • European Works Council (from 2011)
  • European Works Council
  • General framework for informing and consulting employees
  • Framework for promoting employee financial participation
  • Statute for a European Company
  • A European Private Company Statute
  • Statute for a European Cooperative Society

Community Charter of Fundamental Social Rights of Workers

Community Charter of Fundamental Social Rights of Workers

Outline of the Community (European Union) legislation about Community Charter of Fundamental Social Rights of Workers

Topics

These categories group together and put in context the legislative and non-legislative initiatives which deal with the same topic.

Anti-discrimination and relations with civil society

Community Charter of Fundamental Social Rights of Workers

  • free movement of workers;
  • employment and remuneration;
  • improvement of working conditions;
  • social protection;
  • freedom of association and collective bargaining;
  • vocational training;
  • equal treatment for men and women;
  • information, consultation and participation of workers;
  • health protection and safety at the workplace;
  • protection of children, adolescents, elderly persons, and disabled persons.

These social rights represent a foundation of minimum provisions common to all the European Union (EU) Member States. The provisions of the Charter were kept by the Lisbon Treaty (Article 151 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU) and by the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights.

Context

The Charter was adopted in accordance with the preamble of the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, which recognised the need to continually work towards improving the living and working conditions of European citizens.

It was only adopted by the United Kingdom in 1998 as part of the integration of the principles of the Charter into the Amsterdam Treaty.

Teleworking

Teleworking

Outline of the Community (European Union) legislation about Teleworking

Topics

These categories group together and put in context the legislative and non-legislative initiatives which deal with the same topic.

Employment and social policy > Social dialogue and employee participation

Teleworking

The agreement aims at establishing a general framework at European level concerning the employment conditions of teleworkers and at reconciling the needs for flexibility and security shared by employers and workers. It grants teleworkers the same overall level of protection as workers who carry out their activities at the employer’s premises.

The agreement defines telework as a form of organising and/or performing work, using information technology, in the context of an employment contract/relationship, where work, which could also be performed at the employer’s premises, is carried out away from those premises on a regular basis.

Since telework covers a wide and fast evolving spectrum of circumstances, the social partners have chosen a definition of telework that includes various forms of regular telework.

The agreement focuses on several key areas in which the specific nature of telework must be taken into account, viz:

  • voluntary nature of teleworking: telework is voluntary for the worker and the employer concerned. Telework may be required as part of a worker’s initial job description or it may be engaged in as a voluntary arrangement subsequently. In both cases, the employer provides the teleworker with relevant written information in accordance with Directive 91/533/EEC;
  • employment conditions: teleworkers benefit from the same rights as comparable workers at the employer’s premises. These rights are guaranteed by applicable legislation and collective agreements. In order to take into account the particularities of telework, specific agreements may be necessary;
  • data protection: the employer is responsible for taking the appropriate measures to ensure the protection of data used and processed by the teleworker for professional purposes. The employer informs the teleworker in particular of any restrictions on the use of equipment and of sanctions in the case of non-compliance;
  • privacy: the employer respects the teleworker’s privacy. If any kind of monitoring system is put in place, it needs to be proportionate to the objective and introduced in accordance with Directive 90/270 on visual display units;
  • equipment: as a general rule, the employer is responsible for providing, installing and maintaining the equipment necessary for regular telework unless the teleworker uses his/her own equipment. The employer has the liability, in accordance with national legislation and collective agreements, regarding costs for loss and damage to the equipment and data used by the teleworker;
  • health and safety: the employer is responsible for the protection of the occupational health and safety of the teleworker in accordance with Directive 89/391 and relevant daughter directives, national legislation and collective agreements. In order to verify that the applicable health and safety provisions are correctly employed, the employer, workers’ representatives and/or relevant authorities have access to the telework place, within the limits of national legislation and collective agreements. If the teleworker is working at home, such access is subject to prior notification and his/her agreement. The teleworker is entitled to request inspection visits;
  • organisation of work: within the framework of applicable legislation, collective agreements and company rules, the teleworker manages the organisation of his/her working time. The workload and performance standards of the teleworker are equivalent to those of comparable workers at the employer’s premises;
  • training of teleworkers: teleworkers have the same access to training and career development as comparable workers at the employer’s premises and are subject to the same appraisal policies as these are their workers. Teleworkers receive appropriate training targeted at the technical equipment at their disposal and at the characteristics of this form of work organisation;
  • the collective rights of teleworkers: teleworkers have the same collective rights as workers at the employer’s premises. No obstacles are put to communicating with workers’ representatives.

Implementation and follow-up

This European framework agreement will be implemented within three years after the date of signature by the members of UNICE/UEAPME, CEEP and ETUC (and the Liaison Committee EUROCADRES/CEC).

Member organisations will report on the implementation of this agreement to an ad-hoc group set up by the signatory parties, under the responsibility of the Social Dialogue Committee. Within four years after the date of signature of this agreement, this ad-hoc group will prepare a joint report on the implementation measures taken.

The signatory parties will review the agreement five years after the date of signature if requested by one of the signatory parties.

Context

This new agreement directly supports the strategy defined at the Lisbon European Council and the transition to a knowledge-based economy and society, in line with the Lisbon objectives.

In July 1997, the European Commission adopted a raft of policy recommendations on the labour market and the social dimension of the information society. The recommendations included commitments to promote teleworking in Europe and to study teleworking within the Commission.

In 1998 a pilot project was launched by the Directorate General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities and the Directorate-General for the Information Society. It includes three telework types of a part-time nature: working both from home and in the office, working whilst on the move during official missions, and occasional work in another Commission building.

The promotion of telework opportunities is one of the components of the Commission’s proposals for an employment strategy in the information society. The Commission supports the work of the social partners with a view to establishing framework conditions and practical rules so as to allow telework to be introduced on a large scale.

Working conditions of mobile workers engaged in interoperable cross-border services in the railway sector

Working conditions of mobile workers engaged in interoperable cross-border services in the railway sector

Outline of the Community (European Union) legislation about Working conditions of mobile workers engaged in interoperable cross-border services in the railway sector

Topics

These categories group together and put in context the legislative and non-legislative initiatives which deal with the same topic.

Employment and social policy > Social dialogue and employee participation

Working conditions of mobile workers engaged in interoperable cross-border services in the railway sector

Document or Iniciative

Council Directive 2005/47/EC of 18 July 2005 on the Agreement between the Community of European Railways (CER) and the European Transport Workers’ Federation (ETF) on certain aspects of the working conditions of mobile workers engaged in interoperable cross-border services in the railway sector [Official Journal L 195 of 27.07.2005].

Summary

The aim of the Directive is to give effect to the Agreement on certain aspects of the working conditions of mobile workers assigned to interoperable cross-border services concluded between the social partners in the railways sector, namely the Community of European Railways (CER) and the European Transport Workers’ Federation (ETF).

The Agreement strikes a balance between the need to ensure adequate protection of the health and safety of mobile workers in interoperable cross-border services and the need for flexibility in running rail transport enterprises in an integrated European railway network.

The Agreement grants workers a daily rest period of 12 consecutive hours and breaks of between 30 and 45 minutes. It limits daily driving time to 9 hours on a day shift and 8 hours on a night shift.

The Agreement also gives employers greater flexibility because, under exceptional circumstances, they can shorten the daily rest periods to 9 hours instead of to 11 as provided for in the Working Hours Directive.

The Member States may keep or introduce more favourable provisions than those laid down in this Directive. Furthermore, this Directive may not be used to justify a lower level of protection for workers where better protection is afforded under existing national legislation.

Background

This Directive is part of the overall framework for interoperability in the European rail system. A better-integrated rail network will enable the European Union to cut down on road transport and reduce its harmful side-effects. Involving social partners will ensure satisfactory working conditions for workers in interoperable rail services.

References

Act Entry into force Deadline for transposition in the Member States Official Journal
Directive 2005/47/EC

18.7.2005

27.7.2008

OJ L 195 of 27.7.2005

Related Acts

Communication of 15 December 2008 from the Commission to the Council – Economic and social impact of the Agreement appended to Directive 2005/47/EC concluded on 27 January 2004 between the social partners on certain aspects of the working conditions of mobile workers engaged in interoperable cross-border services in the railway sector [COM(2008) 855 final – Not published in the Official Journal].
Following the adoption of Directive 2005/47/EC, the Commission presents a socio-economic analysis of the development of working conditions in the railway sector. Developing cross-border links have a positive economic impact, and employment in the railway sector should increase in the coming years. Favourable social conditions should be guaranteed for mobile workers, while taking account of the needs of railway undertakings.

The Commission favours an integrated approach to ensure that working time is organised in accordance with the obligation to protect the health and safety of workers. Member States should also guarantee a balance between work and family life, especially by reaching a consensus with the social partners on the question of rest days at home.

Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time [Official Journal L 299 of 18.11.2003].
This Directive lays down the minimum general obligations in terms of health and safety at work.

Communication of 26 June 2002 from the Commission “The European social dialogue, a force for innovation and change” [

COM(2002) 341 final

– Not published in the Official Journal].
The social dialogue at Community level is an essential element of the adoption of the social and economic reforms. It is part of the reinforcement of good governance and the transparency of the European decision-making process.