Tag Archives: Signature of an agreement

Free trade agreement with the Republic of Korea

Free trade agreement with the Republic of Korea

Outline of the Community (European Union) legislation about Free trade agreement with the Republic of Korea

Topics

These categories group together and put in context the legislative and non-legislative initiatives which deal with the same topic.

External relations > Relations with third countries > Asia

Free trade agreement with the Republic of Korea

Document or Iniciative

Free trade agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Korea, of the other part.

Summary

Under this free trade agreement between the European Union (EU) and Korea, the partners will progressively eliminate duties and import quotas applying to imports and exports of industrial and agricultural products. They will also introduce progressive liberalisation of services and investment.

The main objectives of this Agreement are:

  • to eliminate duties for European exporters of industrial and agricultural products;
  • to improve market access for EU service providers;
  • to abolish non-tariff restrictions in the electronics, pharmaceuticals and medical devices sectors;
  • to improve market access for EU car manufacturers;
  • to improve access to government procurement markets;
  • to protect intellectual property rights;
  • to strengthen competition law;
  • to improve transparency;
  • to promote sustainable development;
  • to establish a rapid and effective dispute settlement system.

Elimination of tariff and non-tariff measures

The EU and Korea will progressively abolish customs duties applying to their trade in goods. This liberalisation applies to a list of goods (Annex 2-A).

In addition, the partners may not adopt any other types of import or export restrictions. However, they may provide for sanitary and phytosanitary measures in order to protect human, animal or plant life or health. In accordance with the principles of the World Trade Organization (WTO), the partners shall minimise the effects of these measures on the development of trade.

Trade in services and right of establishment

The partners undertake to liberalise part of their offer of services in accordance with the WTO’s General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS). They have therefore drawn up a list of commitments and limitations (Annex 7-A) concerning the liberalised service sectors.

Similarly, the Agreement defines the rules on the right of establishment for access to the market in services, and on the right of residence for professionals.

Lastly, the liberalisation of financial services may be restricted in order to protect the partners’ financial systems or to protect investors and individuals receiving these services.

Government procurement

The EU and Korea shall grant each other access to their markets in products and services, in compliance with the rules on openness, transparency and non-discrimination in the WTO’s Agreement on Government Procurement.

The rules applying to public works contracts are laid down in Annex 9 to this Agreement.

Dispute settlement

In the event of non-compliance with the provisions of the Agreement, the parties shall have recourse to extrajudicial dispute settlement mechanisms, particularly rapid arbitration and mediation procedures.

Sustainable development

The Agreement includes provisions establishing joint commitments and a framework for cooperation on trade and sustainable development and provides for dialogue and continuous commitment between the EU and South Korea in the areas of environment and employment.

Context

This free trade agreement is the most complete and the most ambitious agreement concluded by the EU with a third country. The strategy for a Global Europe: Competing in the world (BG) (CS) (ET) (GA) (LV) (LT) (HU) (MT) (PL) (RO) (SK) (SL) envisages the development of this type of agreement in order to provide the EU with preferential access to external markets.

According to a recent study , this Agreement should make it possible to double bilateral trade over the next twenty years compared to a situation without an agreement in place.

Economic partnership between Eastern and Southern Africa States

Economic partnership between Eastern and Southern Africa States

Outline of the Community (European Union) legislation about Economic partnership between Eastern and Southern Africa States

Topics

These categories group together and put in context the legislative and non-legislative initiatives which deal with the same topic.

Development > African Caribbean and Pacific states (ACP)

Economic partnership between Eastern and Southern Africa States

Document or Iniciative

Proposal for a Council Decision on the signature and provisional application of the interim agreement establishing a framework for an Economic Partnership Agreement between Eastern and Southern Africa States on the one part and the European Community and its Member States, on the other part.

Summary

The European Union and the Eastern and Southern Africa (ESA) States have agreed on the provisional application of the interim agreement establishing a framework for an Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA).

When the interim agreement enters into force, five of the ESA countries, Comoros, Madagascar, Mauritius, Seychelles and Zimbabwe, will be covered by the guarantee of a harmonised trade regime. They will be listed in Council Regulation 1528/2007 on the application of regimes provided for under Economic Partnership Agreements. However, Zambia did not table a European Union market access offer. This State continues to benefit from the Everything But Arms (EBA) regime, that implies the total suspension of Common Customs Tariff duties for all products, with the exception of arms and munitions.

The signature of an EPA was made necessary by the expiry in 2007 of the regime provided for by the Cotonou Agreement, on the safeguard clauses relating to trade measures, as well as the World Trade Organisation (WTO) waiver covering that regime. The EPA covers many areas targeted by the Cotonou Agreement. It generates stability for trade until a comprehensive EPA has been concluded.

This agreement provides the measures necessary to establish a Free Trade Area compatible with WTO requirements. Several products have been excluded from this liberalisation in order to protect the most sensitive sectors or emerging industries in these States.

These provisions concern in particular:

  • rules of origin;
  • non-tariff measures;
  • trade defence measures;
  • trade dispute avoidance and settlement;
  • fisheries and development;
  • administrative and institutional cooperation.

The agreement is to be implemented in line with ESA development strategies, and the partners undertake to cooperate to strengthen the regional integration process of African countries. The scope of the interim agreement will be extended according to the results of negotiations concerning the comprehensive EPA.

An EPA committee made up of party representatives should be established and will be responsible for monitoring the matters covered by the agreement.

Context

The conclusion of this interim agreement took place in several stages. Agreements were signed on 28 November 2007 with Seychelles, Zambia and Zimbabwe, on 4 December 2007 with Mauritius and on 11 December 2007 with Comoros and Madagascar. This agreement is open to participation from all other States in the Eastern and Southern Africa region.

Negotiations with a view to concluding a comprehensive agreement have been continuing since 7 February 2004 with the ESA States, in line with the Directives adopted by the Council on 12 June 2002. Ministers from the Eastern and Southern Africa (ESA) region and representatives of the Commission of the European Union, meeting in Brussels on 28 February 2007, gave joint conclusionson the state of these negotiations.

References And Procedure

Proposal

Official Journal

Procedure

COM(2008) 863 final

Related Act

Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament of 23 October 2007 on Economic Partnership Agreements [COM(2007) 635 final – Not published in the Official Journal].

Further information can be obtained from the website of the European Commission’s Directorate-General for External Trade.

Agreement with Japan on mutual legal assistance

Agreement with Japan on mutual legal assistance

Outline of the Community (European Union) legislation about Agreement with Japan on mutual legal assistance

Topics

These categories group together and put in context the legislative and non-legislative initiatives which deal with the same topic.

External relations > Relations with third countries > Asia

Agreement with Japan on mutual legal assistance

Document or Iniciative

Council Decision 2010/616/EU of 7 October 2010 on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Japan on mutual legal assistance in criminal matters.

Summary

The European Union (EU) and Japan negotiated an agreement on mutual legal assistance in criminal matters with a view to establishing more effective cooperation in this field. The agreement, which entered into force on 2 January 2011, is the first “self-standing” mutual legal assistance agreement between the EU and a non-EU country. So far, no individual EU country has concluded such an agreement with Japan.

The agreement applies to the requesting and provision of mutual legal assistance in relation to investigations, prosecutions and other proceedings in criminal matters. It does not apply to extradition, transfer of proceedings in criminal matters and enforcement of sentences, apart from confiscation.

The legal assistance consists of:

  • taking testimonies, including by videoconference;
  • searching and seizing items;
  • obtaining information on bank accounts;
  • examining and locating or identifying persons, items or places;
  • providing items held by the authorities;
  • serving documents;
  • transferring persons in custody for the purpose of testimony;
  • freezing or seizing and confiscating proceeds.

Each EU country and Japan must designate a central authority with responsibility for sending, receiving and responding to requests for assistance. These authorities are also responsible for executing the requests or for transmitting the requests to the authorities with jurisdiction to execute them.

Requests for assistance

The country making a request for assistance must do so in writing. In urgent cases, the request may be made by other reliable means of communication. Requests for assistance must contain certain specific information as set out in the agreement. The requested country may ask for additional information if necessary for executing the request for assistance. The request, together with any other documents, must be accompanied by a translation in the official language of the requested country or in another language as agreed by that country.

Execution of requests

The requested country must execute the request for assistance as swiftly as possible and in accordance with its national law. It may postpone the execution of a request, or make execution subject to specific conditions, if it could interfere with an ongoing investigation, prosecution or other proceeding. The requested country must transmit the result of the execution, together with any testimonies or items obtained, to the requesting country. If it cannot execute a request in whole or in part, it must provide the requesting country with the reasons thereof. Under certain conditions, the requested country may refuse to provide assistance, for example if the request concerns an offence that is punishable by death under the law of the requesting country. When refusing assistance, the requested country must provide the reasons thereof.

Testimonies and statements

The requesting country may only use testimonies, statements, items or information in the investigations, prosecutions or other proceedings for which they were requested. The requested country may impose provisions of confidentiality or other conditions to the use of these data. It may also impose conditions to the transport, maintenance and return of items requested.

To take testimonies or statements, the requested country may use coercive measures if necessary and provided that this is justifiable under its national law. In cases where the person concerned is to be heard as a witness in proceedings of the requesting country, the requested country may allow its competent authorities to take the testimony or statement by videoconference.

Persons, items and places

If necessary and justifiable under its national law, the requested country may use coercive measures to obtain items and to examine persons, items or places.

The requested country must provide the requesting country with records, documents or reports related to the bank accounts of the person under investigation, to the extent that the bank in question possesses the information.

The requested country must provide the requesting country with any publicly available items that its legislative, administrative or judicial authorities possess. It should also provide any non-public items, such as criminal records, that these authorities possess, to the extent and under the same conditions as they are available to its investigative and prosecuting authorities.

The requested country must serve documents and summons to persons requested to appear before the competent authorities of the requesting country. If the presence of a person in custody is requested for testimony, the requested country may temporarily transfer that person to the requesting country. However, the person to be transferred must first give his/her consent and the transfer must be permitted under the law of the requested country.

Confiscation of proceeds

The requested country should assist the requesting country in proceedings related to the freezing or seizure and confiscation of proceeds of crime, as far as it is permitted by its national law. The requesting country must provide the decision of a court or other judicial authority that imposes the confiscation together with its request. If the proceeds are in the custody of the requested country, it may transfer them in whole or in part to the requesting country.

References

Act Entry into force Deadline for transposition in the Member States Official Journal
Decision 2010/616/EU

7.10.2010

OJ L 271 of 15.10.2010

Convention on Choice of Court Agreements

Convention on Choice of Court Agreements

Outline of the Community (European Union) legislation about Convention on Choice of Court Agreements

Topics

These categories group together and put in context the legislative and non-legislative initiatives which deal with the same topic.

Justice freedom and security > Judicial cooperation in civil matters

Convention on Choice of Court Agreements

Document or Iniciative

Council Decision 2009/397/EC of 26 February 2009 on the signing on behalf of the European Community of the Convention on Choice of Court Agreements.

Summary

The Convention on Choice of Court Agreements was concluded under The Hague Conference on Private International Law on 30 June 2005. This decision provides for the signing of that convention on behalf of the European Community.

The convention applies in international cases to exclusive choice of court agreements concluded in civil or commercial matters. Its scope excludes both consumer and employment contracts. Neither does the convention apply to a number of other matters, such as the legal capacity of natural persons, maintenance obligations and other family law matters, the carriage of passengers or goods, marine pollution, competition matters, the validity of legal persons, the validity of intellectual property rights, etc. Furthermore, it does not apply to arbitration and related proceedings.

An exclusive choice of court agreement may be concluded by two or more parties to designate the courts (or one or more specific courts) of one contracting state as having jurisdiction in disputes relating to a particular legal relationship. Such an agreement is considered to be exclusive, unless otherwise specified by the parties to the agreement. The agreement must be made in writing or by other means that allow the information to be accessed subsequently.

Jurisdiction

The designated court has jurisdiction to decide a dispute to which the agreement applies, except when its national law does not recognise the agreement as valid. Any other court of a contracting state must suspend or dismiss the related proceedings, except in cases where the agreement is null and void under the law of the state of the chosen court, the party lacked the capacity to conclude the agreement under the national law of the court seised, implementation of the agreement contravenes the public policy of the state of the court seised, the agreement cannot be performed or the chosen court decides against hearing the case.

Recognition and enforcement

The other contracting states must recognise and enforce a judgement given by the court designated in the exclusive choice of court agreement. However, the judgement must first be enforceable in the state of origin. The postponement or refusal of recognition or enforcement is possible when the judgement is under review in the state of origin or when the deadline for seeking ordinary review has not yet expired.

Recognition or enforcement of a judgement may also be refused when:

  • the agreement is null and void in the state of the chosen court;
  • a party lacked the capacity to conclude the agreement under the law of the requested state;
  • the document instituting the proceedings was not presented in sufficient time to the defendant;
  • the manner in which the document instituting the proceedings was presented to the defendant is in conflict with the fundamental principles on serving documents;
  • the judgement was obtained through a fraudulent procedure;
  • recognition or enforcement is manifestly incompatible with the public policy of the requested state;
  • the judgement is not consistent with an earlier one given by the requested state in a dispute between the same parties;
  • the judgement is not consistent with an earlier one given by another state in a dispute between the same parties and for the same action.

When requesting the recognition or enforcement of a judgement, the party needs to produce the following documents:

  • a copy of the judgement;
  • a copy of the exclusive choice of court agreement;
  • in case the judgement was given by default, a document indicating that the defaulting party was notified of the institution of the proceedings;
  • a document indicating that the judgement is enforceable in the state of origin;
  • in the case of a judicial settlement, a certificate of a court indicating that the settlement is equally enforceable in the state of origin.

An application may also be made for the partial recognition or enforcement of a judgement.

The law governing the procedure for recognition, declaration for enforceability or registration for enforcement and the enforcement of the judgement is that of the requested state.

Declarations limiting jurisdiction, recognition or enforcement

A state may at any time make a declaration whereby its courts refuse to exercise their jurisdiction in determining disputes if there is no connection between the parties to the dispute and that state. Similarly, a state may make a declaration whereby its courts refuse to recognise or enforce a judgement if the parties to the dispute are resident in that state and the relationship of the parties as well as all other elements relating to the dispute are connected only with it. A state may also make a declaration whereby it will not apply this convention to a specific matter. In addition, a state may make a declaration whereby it recognises and enforces judgments given by courts of other contracting states designated in a non-exclusive choice of court agreement.

REFERENCES

Act Entry into force Deadline for transposition in the Member States Official Journal
Decision 2009/397/EC

26.2.2009

OJ L 133 of 29.5.2009

Scientific and technological cooperation with Jordan

Scientific and technological cooperation with Jordan

Outline of the Community (European Union) legislation about Scientific and technological cooperation with Jordan

Topics

These categories group together and put in context the legislative and non-legislative initiatives which deal with the same topic.

Research and innovation > Research and innovation: international dimension and enlargement

Scientific and technological cooperation with Jordan

Document or Iniciative

Council Decision 2011/348/EC of 10 November 2009 on the signing, on behalf of the Community, and provisional application of the Agreement between the European Community and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan on Scientific and Technological Cooperation.

Agreement between the European Community and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan on Scientific and Technological Cooperation.

Summary

The European Union (EU) and Jordan undertake to develop their cooperation in the field of science and technology.

Their cooperation is based, in particular, on the principles of mutual benefit and promotion of knowledge as a factor in economic and social development.

The implementation of the Agreement is managed by a joint cooperation committee.

Functioning of the cooperation

Cooperation activities may be undertaken by natural or legal persons. In this respect, the EU and Jordan must facilitate the free movement and residence of research workers in their respective territories, and the movement of goods intended for use in cooperation.

Participants established in Jordan may participate in indirect actions under the EU’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities. The European authorities are authorised to perform controls and audits on contracts and grant agreements awarded to Jordanian participants, with the support of the country’s authorities.

Participants established in the EU may participate in research, development and demonstration programmes and projects in Jordan. They shall carry out their actions with due regard to national rules and be treated equitably compared with Jordanian participants.

Cooperation activities may take the following forms in particular:

  • regular political dialogue in the area of research;
  • exchanges of scientific and technological information;
  • exchanges of research workers, engineers and technicians;
  • exchanges of equipment, materials and testing services;
  • research and technological development training.

In addition, the Jordanian authorities and the Commission shall exchange information on current programmes and on new cooperation opportunities.

Intellectual property rights

Rules concerning the protection of intellectual property rights and the dissemination of knowledge are laid down in Annex II to the Agreement. These rules are compatible with national and international regulations. They apply to knowledge generated in the course of cooperation activities, to scientific literary works and to confidential information.

Agreement between the European Union and the United States on the transfer of financial messaging data

Agreement between the European Union and the United States on the transfer of financial messaging data

Outline of the Community (European Union) legislation about Agreement between the European Union and the United States on the transfer of financial messaging data

Topics

These categories group together and put in context the legislative and non-legislative initiatives which deal with the same topic.

External relations > Industrialised countries

Agreement between the European Union and the United States on the transfer of financial messaging data

Document or Iniciative

Council Decision 2010/412/EU of 13 July 2010 on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the United States of America on the processing and transfer of Financial Messaging Data from the European Union to the United States for the purposes of the Terrorist Finance Tracking Program.

Summary

For the purpose of preventing, investigating, detecting or prosecuting terrorism or terrorist financing, this agreement between the European Union (EU) and the United States of America (U.S.) provides for the transfer of:

  • financial payment messages that refer to financial transfers and related data, which are stored in the EU by international financial payment messaging service providers (designated providers), to the U.S. Treasury Department;
  • relevant information acquired from the U.S. Treasury Department’s Terrorist Finance Tracking Program (TFTP) to EU countries’ law enforcement, public security or counter terrorism authorities, or to Europol or Eurojust.

To obtain the necessary data stored in the EU, the U.S. Treasury Department makes a request, and sends any supplemental documents, to a designated provider on U.S. territory. At the same time, it provides a copy of these documents to Europol, which verifies the compliance of the request with the requirements of the agreement and notifies the designated provider accordingly. Once the compliance of the request is confirmed, it will have binding legal effect and the designated provider is required to transfer the requested data to the U.S. Treasury Department.

The U.S. Treasury Department must ensure that certain safeguards, particularly in relation to the protection of personal data, are applied when the provided data is processed. The data may only be processed for the purpose of preventing, investigating, detecting or prosecuting terrorism or terrorist financing. It must be secured from unauthorised access, disclosure and loss, as well as from any unauthorised form of processing. A search of the provided data may only be initiated where there is pre-existing information or evidence indicating that the subject of the search might be connected to terrorism or its financing. All searches and the reasons thereof must be recorded.

The U.S. Treasury Department must delete non-extracted data:

  • no longer necessary for the fight against terrorism, based on (at least) an annual evaluation;
  • transmitted without having been requested;
  • by 20 July 2012 at the latest, if it was received before 20 July 2007;
  • no later than five years after receipt, if it was received after 20 July 2007.

Extracted data may be retained for only as long as is necessary to fulfil the purpose for which it was requested. The agreement also defines safeguards to limit the onward transfers of extracted data.

The U.S. Treasury Department must make information obtained through the TFTP that may contribute to the EU’s actions against terrorism available to the relevant authorities of the EU countries concerned and, as appropriate, to Europol and Eurojust. If any follow-on information is deemed as necessary to the U.S.’s fight against terrorism, it must be similarly conveyed back. To facilitate these exchanges of information, a Europol liaison officer may be delegated to the U.S. Treasury Department.

A relevant EU country authority, Europol or Eurojust may provide the U.S. Treasury Department with a request to search data acquired through the TFTP and to transfer relevant information if there is reason to believe that a person or entity is connected to terrorism or its financing as defined by the framework decision on combating terrorism and the directive on the prevention of the use of the financial system for money laundering.

During the term of the agreement, the Commission will examine the options available for establishing an EU system equivalent to the U.S. TFTP. Once the European system is established, there will be the need to review and possibly modify this agreement and ensure the complementariness of the two systems.

Independent overseers will monitor compliance with the limitations and safeguards of the agreement. They have the authority to review, query and block searches of provided data, as well as to request for additional justifications on the connection to terrorism. One of these overseers will be appointed by the Commission.

Via the national data protection authority, a person has the right to request confirmation that his/her personal data has been processed in compliance with data protection rights. Disclosure of this information may be refused or restricted if necessary for the fight against terrorism or the protection of public or national security. In such cases, a written explanation will be given to the person, together with information on the possibility to seek administrative and judicial redress in the U.S. A person also has the right to request the rectification, erasure or blocking of inaccurate or wrongly processed personal data. To maintain the accuracy of information received or transmitted under this agreement, the data may be supplemented, deleted or corrected by each party. The U.S. Treasury Department provides information on the TFTP on a public website, including on the right of redress.

This agreement enters into force on 1 August 2010 and will remain in force for a period of five years. Afterwards, it will be automatically extended for subsequent periods of one year, unless one of the parties notifies of its intention not to extend it.

References

Act Entry into force Deadline for transposition in the Member States Official Journal

Decision 2010/412/EU

13.7.2010

OJ L 195, 27.7.2010