Tag Archives: Malta

Enlargement 2004 and 2007

Enlargement 2004 and 2007

Outline of the Community (European Union) legislation about Enlargement 2004 and 2007

Topics

These categories group together and put in context the legislative and non-legislative initiatives which deal with the same topic.

Enlargement > Enlargement 2004 and 2007

Enlargement 2004 and 2007

The fifth enlargement is historic and unprecedented in the history of the European Union. The ten Central and Eastern European countries, together with Cyprus and Malta, joined the EU in two successive waves in 2004 and 2007. In this context, the EU paved the way for the current enlargement process by establishing suitable instruments to be able to respond not only to the needs of the candidate countries, but also to the specific needs of the EU to receive them.

  • Bulgaria – adoption of the community acquis
  • Romania – adoption of the community acquis
  • Cyprus – adoption of the community acquis
  • Estonia – adoption of the community acquis
  • Hungary – adoption of the community acquis
  • Latvia – adoption of the community acquis
  • Lithuania – adoption of the community acquis
  • Malta – adoption of the community acquis
  • Poland – adoption of the community acquis
  • Czech republic – adoption of the community acquis
  • Slovakia – adoption of the community acquis
  • Slovenia – adoption of the community acquis
  • Partnership for the accession of Cyprus
  • Partnership for the accession of Estonia
  • Partnership for the accession of Hungary
  • Partnership for the accession of Latvia
  • Partnership for the accession of Lithuania
  • Partnership for the accession of Malta
  • Partnership for the accession of Poland
  • Partnership for the accession of the Czech Republic
  • Partnership for the accession of Slovakia
  • Partnership for the accession of Slovenia

HISTORY OF EASTERN ENLARGEMENT

General Provisions

  • The 2004 enlargement: the challenge of a 25-member EU
  • Enlargement, two years after – an economic success
  • The communication strategy on enlargement
  • Participation of the Central and Eastern European candidate countries in Community programmes
  • The challenge of enlargement
  • Agenda 2000: for a stronger and wider Union

Sectoral approach

  • Enlargement of the euro area after 1 May 2004
  • Joint assessments of employment policies in the candidate countries
  • Community response to the flooding in central Europe
  • Strengthening administrative and judicial capacity
  • Nuclear safety in the Newly Independent States and Central and Eastern Europe
  • Accession strategies for the environment
  • Community action for regions bordering the candidate countries

PRE-ACCESSION INSTRUMENTS 2000-2006

  • Phare Programme
  • Pre-accession agricultural instrument (SAPARD)
  • Instrument for structural policy for pre-accession
  • Cross-border cooperation programme
  • Coordination instrument

ENLARGEMENT 2007

  • Roadmaps for Bulgaria and Romania

Bulgaria

  • Partnership for the accession of Bulgaria

Romania

  • The Accession Partnership with Romania

ENLARGEMENT 2004

Cyprus

  • Partnership for the accession of Cyprus

Estonia

  • Partnership for the accession of Estonia

Hungary

  • Partnership for the accession of Hungary

Latvia

  • Partnership for the accession of Latvia

Lithuania

  • Partnership for the accession of Lithuania

Malta

  • Partnership for the accession of Malta

Poland

  • Partnership for the accession of Poland

Czech Republic

  • Partnership for the accession of the Czech Republic

Slovakia

  • Partnership for the accession of Slovakia

Slovenia

  • Partnership for the accession of Slovenia

Mediterranean partner countries

Mediterranean partner countries

Outline of the Community (European Union) legislation about Mediterranean partner countries

Topics

These categories group together and put in context the legislative and non-legislative initiatives which deal with the same topic.

External relations > Mediterranean partner countries

Mediterranean partner countries

GENERAL FRAMEWORK

Framework for relations

  • Partnership for democracy and prosperity with the Southern Mediterranean
  • Barcelona Process: Union for the Mediterranean
  • Euro-Mediterranean Association Agreements
  • Pan-Euro-Mediterranean system of cumulation of origin

Barcelona Process: Euro-Mediterranean Partnership

  • Tenth anniversary of the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership
  • The Valencia Ministerial Conference and its Action Plan
  • Reinvigorating the Barcelona process
  • Barcelona Declaration and Euro-Mediterranean partnership
  • EU Common Strategy for the Mediterranean

European Neighbourhood Policy

  • New neighbourhood policy strategy
  • Taking stock of the European Neighbourhood Policy
  • Neighbourhood policy: participation in European Union Agencies and programmes
  • Neighbourhood Policy – Strategy paper
  • Neighbourhood Policy: 2008 Report
  • Implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy in 2007
  • European Neighbourhood Policy: recommendations for Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia and for Egypt and Lebanon

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

  • European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument (2007 – 2013)
  • Euro-Mediterranean Regional Strategy and Indicative Programme 2007-2013
  • Inter-regional programme: Strategy paper 2007-2013 and indicative programme 2007-2010
  • Cross-border cooperation (CBC) 2007-2013
  • Common framework for joint multiannual programming
  • MEDA programme
  • Financial and technical cooperation with the West Bank and the Gaza Strip

SECTORAL COOPERATION

  • Human rights and relations in the Mediterranean
  • Environment strategy for the Mediterranean
  • Euro-African Partnership for infrastructure
  • Cooperation with Non-EU Member Countries on nuclear safety
  • European Training Foundation (ETF)
  • Combating HIV/AIDS in the European Union and neighbouring countries (2009-2013)
  • Action on HIV/AIDS in the European Union and neighbouring countries 2006 – 2009

Malta – adoption of the community acquis

Malta – adoption of the community acquis

Outline of the Community (European Union) legislation about Malta – adoption of the community acquis

Topics

These categories group together and put in context the legislative and non-legislative initiatives which deal with the same topic.

Enlargement > Enlargement 2004 and 2007 > Malta – adoption of the community acquis

Malta – adoption of the community acquis

src=”../../../images/icons/picto_18_heading.jpg” alt=”Enlargement” >

  • Malta
  • Malta
  • Malta
  • Malta
  • Malta
  • Malta
  • Malta
  • Malta
  • Malta
  • Malta
  • Malta
  • Malta
  • Malta
  • Malta
  • Malta

Accession of Cyprus and Malta to euro area

Accession of Cyprus and Malta to euro area

Outline of the Community (European Union) legislation about Accession of Cyprus and Malta to euro area

Topics

These categories group together and put in context the legislative and non-legislative initiatives which deal with the same topic.

Economic and monetary affairs > Institutional and economic framework of the euro

Accession of Cyprus and Malta to euro area (2008)

Acts

Council Decision 2007/503/EC of 10 July 2007 in accordance with Article 122(2) of the Treaty on the adoption by Cyprus of the single currency on 1 January 2008.

Council Decision 2007/504/EC of 10 July 2007 in accordance with Article 122(2) of the Treaty on the adoption by Malta of the single currency on 1 January 2008.

Summary

In these two Decisions, the Council states that Cyprus and Malta satisfy all the conditions required to adopt the euro:

  • Cyprus and Malta satisfy the requirements established by the convergence criteria: price stability, the government budgetary position, participation in the exchange mechanism of the European monetary system, the existence of a satisfactory long-term interest rate;
  • Cyprus and Malta have national legislation which is compatible with the introduction of the euro.

Consequently, the Council chose the date of 1 January 2008 for these two Member States to adopt the euro.

Procedure

During its meeting of 10 July 2007, the Economic and Monetary Affairs Council gave the go-ahead for the introduction of the euro in Cyprus and Malta. Prior to that, the European Commission had established in the convergence reports that both States fulfilled the membership criteria for the Economic and Monetary Union.

These Decisions are addressed to the Member States. They stipulate that Cyprus and Malta fulfil the necessary conditions for the adoption of the single currency. They repeal the derogations in favour of the two countries referred to in Article 4 of the 2003 Act of Accession.

The Council decides which Member States fulfil the necessary conditions for the adoption of the euro, i.e. compatibility of their national legislation with the Community acquis and the convergence criteria set out in Article 140 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU (formerly Article 121 of the EC Treaty). The two proposals presented by the Commission on 16 May 2007 (Cyprus: CNS/2007/0090 and Malta: CNS/2007/0092) resulted in the present Decisions.

REFERENCES

Act Entry into force Deadline for transposition in the Member States Official Journal
Decision 2007/503/EC

Date of notification

OJ L 186 of 18.7.2007

Decision 2007/504/EC

Date of notification

OJ L 186 of 18.7.2007

RELATED ACTS

Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions and the European Central Bank of 18 April 2008 on the introduction of the euro in Cyprus and Malta [COM(2008) 204 final – Not published in the Official Journal].

The Commission presents the results of the introduction of the single currency in Cyprus and Malta. It draws lessons from these for future changeovers to the euro (link to new summary EC000) in European Union Member States.

Malta

Malta

Outline of the Community (European Union) legislation about Malta

Topics

These categories group together and put in context the legislative and non-legislative initiatives which deal with the same topic.

Competition > Competition: international dimension and enlargement

Malta

1) References

Commission Report [COM(1999) 69 final – Not published in the Official Journal]
Commission Report [COM(1999) 508 final – Not published in the Official Journal]
Commission Report [COM(2000) 708 final – Not published in the Official Journal]
Commission Report [COM(2001) 700 final – SEC(2001) 1751 – Not published in the Official Journal]
Commission Report [COM(2002) 700 final – SEC(2002) 1407 – Not published in the Official Journal]
Commission Report [COM(2003) 675 final – SEC(2003) 1206 – Not published in the Official Journal]
Treaty of Accession to the European Union [Official Journal L 236 of 23.09.2003]

2) Summary

The February 1999 Report finds that, since the 1993 Opinion, progress has been made in the anti-trust field with the adoption of the “Competition Act” in 1995. In other areas such as merger control, state aid, public companies and state monopolies, adoption of the acquis is a priority. On the institutional front, the existing organisations and procedures must be improved and a state aid monitoring system must be put in place.

In its October 1999 Report the Commission considered that no substantial progress had been made in 1999. No specific system of state aid and merger control existed as yet in Malta. Malta also should ensure full transparency by presenting annual state aid report and by setting up a state aid monitoring authority. Lastly, measures should be taken to apply the competition rules to state monopolies, public undertakings and private undertakings having special rights.

The Report for 2000 felt that Malta had made little progress in the area, while acknowledging that the setting up of the State aid monitoring Council was a step in the right direction.

The Report for 2001 stated that some progress has been made. With regard to restrictive agreements, the Competition Act has been amended, and in the field of State aid, a new law on the promotion of firms has come into force.

The Report for 2002 stated that Malta had made progress in the area. It needed, however, to make an effort to improve results in the field of application and implementation of legislation on State aid.

The 2003 Report indicates that Maltese law is generally in line with the accession commitments made in the antitrust and State aid fields. However, it notes a worrying delay in implementing the restructuring plan of the shiprepair/shipbuilding industry.
The Treaty of Accession was signed on 16 April 2003 and accession took place on 1 May 2004.

COMMUNITY ACQUIS

The competition rules of the European Community derive from Article 3(g) of the EC Treaty, which provides that the activities of the Community are to include “a system ensuring that competition in the internal market is not distorted”. The main areas of application are agreements between undertakings, abuses of dominant positions and State aid, dealt with under Articles 81, 82 and 87 (ex-Articles 85, 86 and 92) of the EC Treaty.

Malta is therefore called upon to apply progressively the provisions of the Merger Control Regulations (4064/89) and Articles 31 (ex-Article 37) and 86 (ex-Article 90) concerning monopolies and special rights of the EC Treaty.

EVALUATION

Overall, Maltese legislation in the field of competition is largely in line with the acquis, apart from exemption for public undertakings, and Malta has achieved reasonable results on implementation.

From 2002 onwards exemption of certain firms from the Competition Act will be justifiable only in the defence of public interest.

In administrative terms, the Office for Fair Competition, the body responsible for seeing that the anti-trust legislation is observed, and the Council in monitoring state aid, have produced positive results.

With regard to State aid, Malta has adopted the system in force in the EC. However, further efforts must be made to ensure that Community State aid rules are implemented effectively. In addition, Malta benefits from transitional arrangements until 2008 for the granting of State aid for shiprepair/shipbuilding. However, the Commission has serious concerns regarding the correct implementation of these arrangements and has called for remedial action to be taken as a matter of urgency to bring Malta into line with Community law and to ensure that it complies with the conditions laid down for accession.

Negotiations on this chapter are still under way. Malta must make additional efforts to ensure that the State aid rules are properly applied and implemented.

This summary is for information only and is not designed to interpret or replace the reference document.

 


Another Normative about Malta

Topics

These categories group together and put in context the legislative and non-legislative initiatives which deal with the same topic

Taxation

Malta

1) References

Commission Report COM(1999) 69 final [Not published in the Official Journal]
Commission Report COM(1999) 508 final [Not published in the Official Journal]
Commission Report COM(2000) 708 final [Not published in the Official Journal]
Commission Report COM(2001) 700 final – SEC(2001) 1751 [Not published in the Official Journal]
Commission Report COM(2002) 700 final – SEC(2002)1407 [Not published in the Official Journal]
Commission Report COM(2003) 675 final – SEC(2003) 1206 [Not published in the Official Journal]
Treaty of Accession to the European Union [Official Journal L 236 of 23.09.2003]

2) Summary

The current VAT system in Malta is based on the main principles of the VAT legislation of the Community. However, some additional adjustments would be required to bring the VAT legislation completely into line with the requirements of the Community acquis.

The second 1998 Report stated that Malta should continue to make significant efforts to align VAT. In the field of excise duties, there were significant discrepancies between the Maltese regime and Community requirements, and considerable effort was therefore required to bring it into line with the Community acquis. It should be possible for Malta to participate in the mutual assistance arrangements.

The October 1999 Report stated that no progress had been made on excise duties and that Malta needed to prepare a structured targeted pre-accession strategy.

The November 2000 Report considered that Malta had made particular progress in the area of VAT.

The November 2001 Report noted that Malta had made significant progress, particularly as regards excise duties. In fact, Malta had amended its legislation on mineral oils, tobacco products and alcoholic drinks. Moreover, hydrocarbons and methane were now subject to tax. In the field of VAT, the laws had also been changed so as to apply the flat rate to the provision of foodstuffs in business and school canteens, whilst the provision of education, health and social assistance services had been exempted. In relation to direct taxation, there had been no harmonisation since the previous report. Administrative capacity had been strengthened through the creation of a department responsible for pre-accession issues. The number of tax inspectors had increased and computer programs for the management of tax debt had been installed.

The October 2002 Report highlighted the progress made in this area, particularly as regards indirect taxation and VAT. However, no notable developments could be reported in the areas of direct taxation and administrative cooperation and mutual assistance.

The 2003 Report finds that Malta has met its commitments under the accession negotiations in the fields of excise duty, VAT and administrative cooperation and mutual assistance. It is therefore expected to be in a position to implement these aspects of the acquis by accession. As it only partly meets requirements regarding indirect taxation, it must continue to transpose the relevant legislation. Urgent attention must be given to eliminating the preferential treatment given to international trading companies for non-residents and to foreign income, and introducing appropriate anti-abuse measures in relation to profit distributions from foreign shareholdings.

During the accession negotiations Malta was granted a transitional period allowing it to continue applying a zero rate on foodstuffs for human consumption and pharmaceutical products until 1 January 2010. It obtained derogations for VAT exemption of international and inland passenger transport and domestic inter-island sea passenger transport and VAT exemption without input VAT credit on water supplied by public authorities and on buildings and building land. Lastly, it was granted a derogation concerning VAT exemption and registration thresholds – EUR 37 000, EUR 24 300 and EUR 14 600 – for particular categories of small and medium-sized businesses (SMEs).
The Treaty of Accession was signed on 16 April 2003 and accession took place on 1 May 2004.

COMMUNITY ACQUIS

With regard to direct taxation, Malta has abolished the tax on capital and its legislation should now be fully in line with the requirements of the acquis.

With regard to indirect taxation, the last report noted that the greatest efforts were being made in relation to the taxation of automotive fuel and cable telephony, which are now taxed at a standard rate of 15%. The result of these measures has been a variation in the deduction entitlement of VAT on fuel used by commercial vehicles. Furthermore, the tax net has been cast wider so that public enterprises of the energy sector are now considered to be taxable persons.

With regard to excise duties, the main area of progress is the increase in the rate of duty on certain cigarettes, thus satisfying the EU’s minimum criterion. The calculation of duties on mineral oils is now in compliance with the requirements of the acquis.

With regard to administrative capacity, the unit in charge of VAT has been strengthened and special units with responsibility for improving the quality of public services have been set up. A director has been appointed to the customs and excise duties unit to apply the customs component of the commercial strategy in view of accession and to successfully implement the companies reform plan for the customs and taxation units.

EVALUATION

In general, Malta is aligning itself on the acquis to a reasonable extent, but it must still make some serious efforts.

Value added tax

VAT was reintroduced in January 1999. It constitutes the necessary framework for the transposition of the acquis, but a lot of alignment work needs to be done. The main deviations still concern the level of the rates applied and the number of exempt transactions, and also the overuse of zero-rating. It is therefore important that Malta define a structured pre-accession strategy in this area. In 2001, although some progress has been made, there are still differences between Malta’s legislation and that of the Community in relation to rates and the list of exempt transactions.

In October 2001, the supply of gold by the Central Bank, which was previously taxed at zero-rate, became taxable at the standard VAT rate. The scope of the special VAT scheme for second-hand goods was broadened to include works of art, collector’s items and antiques. Further alignment with the special VAT scheme for travel agents was also carried out.

In the field of VAT substantial legislative alignment is still required. This concerns in particular the taxable scope, the distinction between supplies of goods and services, the definition of imports, VAT exemptions without credit for input tax and intra-Community transactions.

At the end of 2003, Malta still needed to complete its transposition of the rules on the reduced rate of VAT for electricity and define the scope of the reduced and zero rates more precisely. It also needed to address taxable transactions by public authorities (electricity and steam) and to fully ensure equal treatment irrespective of origin of certain goods in some fields.

Excise Duties

With regard to excise duties, Malta’s legislation conforms with that of the acquis in 2001. Certain provisions were introduced in February 2002 in respect of the general arrangements on holding, movement and monitoring of products subject to excise duties.

Malta needed to address the issue of reduced excise duty rate on beer produced by small breweries, which should only be applied to small independent breweries, and not those operating under licence.

At the end of 2003 further alignment was still required, in particular on the taxable amount and the definition of some products, on the rates applied to some products, and on certain exemptions, some of which, granted on an ad-hoc basis, needed to be eliminated. It also needed to extend its suspension arrangements to include intra-Community transactions, and to ensure that they were implemented without discrimination, irrespective of origin.

Direct taxation

As regards direct taxation, there was no alignment in 2001, so Malta needed to tackle this section of the tax acquis in 2002 in order to comply with the code of conduct for business taxation.

At the end of 2003, Malta needed to complete transposition of the acquis in terms of the taxation of capital raising and mergers, and to transpose the acquis on interest and royalties and taxation of savings income.

Administrative cooperation and mutual assistance

In the area of administrative cooperation and mutual assistance, Malta has yet to introduce the VAT information exchange system.

No progress was made in this area in 2002.

At the end of 2003 the Central Liaison Office and Excise Liaison Office had not yet been established. Preparations for setting up the VAT Information Exchange System (VIES), VAT on e-services, and the excise database (SEED) were ongoing.

Administrative capacity

With regard to administrative capacity, the main structures required for applying the acquis are in place but the implications of adopting the acquis and computerisation remain a challenge for Malta. In 2001, Malta needed to ensure that it fully implemented its plan to reform the management of the tax administration. In 2002, the modernisation of the tax administration needed to be continued and stepped up, particularly in the field of excise duty. The Commission report noted that there was an urgent need to plan and address the changes that accession would entail in this area, as well as the necessary reallocation and training of staff.

At the end of 2003 the capacity of the tax administration in the area of VAT was adequate. The necessary administrative structures for excise duty still needed to be further strengthened. Malta needed to give priority to improving the efficiency of excise duty collection and to introducing risk analysis and auditing techniques. The capacity of the tax administration in the area of direct taxation was adequate and qualified staff were gradually being recruited. Methods for the verification of transfer pricing needed to be established.

This summary is for information only and is not designed to interpret or replace the reference document.