Review procedures: supply, works and service contracts

Review procedures: supply, works and service contracts

Outline of the Community (European Union) legislation about Review procedures: supply, works and service contracts


These categories group together and put in context the legislative and non-legislative initiatives which deal with the same topic.

Internal market > Businesses in the internal market > Public procurement

Review procedures: supply, works and service contracts

Document or Iniciative

Council Directive 89/665/EEC of 21 December 1989 on the coordination of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of review procedures to the award of public supply and public works contracts [See amending acts].


The purpose of this Directive is to ensure the effective application of Directive 2004/18/EC on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts by making it obligatory for the Member States to establish effective and rapid remedies in the event of infringements of these provisions. These procedures are available at least to any person having or having had an interest in obtaining a particular public procurement contract and who has been or is liable to be harmed by an alleged infringement.

Decisions of the contracting authorities which are in breach of the Community law on public procurement contracts must be subject to effective and rapid remedies. In all Member States, such remedies must include, in particular:

  • taking, by way of interlocutory procedures, interim measures (such as suspension of the award procedure in question);
  • setting aside unlawful decisions including discriminatory technical, economic and financial specifications in the invitation to tender;
  • compensating injured parties.

The Member States may provide that where damages are claimed on the grounds that a decision was taken unlawfully, the contested decision must first be set aside by a body having the necessary powers.


To encourage the smooth operation of the review procedure, the Directive sets certain deadlines: Contracts are to be concluded no sooner than 15 days (or ten, if electronic means are used) after they have been awarded. Similarly, national law may provide for a minimum period of 15 days after the contract has been awarded for applying for a review (or ten, if electronic means are used).

If Member States provide for a time limit for applying for a review, it must be a minimum of 30 days after the publication of the contract award notice.

In any event, reviews have to be applied for within six months of the contract being concluded.


Following an independent review, a contract may be considered ineffective. Similarly, contractual obligations may be cancelled retroactively. In addition, Member States may penalise infringements by imposing fines or shortening the duration of the contract.

Corrective mechanism

Where, before a contract is concluded, the Commission considers that a clear and manifest infringement of Community public procurement law has been committed, it may request the Member State concerned to correct it.


The Commission is to examine the implementation of the Directive by no later than 20 December 2012.


Act Entry into force Deadline for transposition in the Member States Official Journal
Directive 89/665/EEC



OJ L 395 of 30.12.1989

Amending act(s) Entry into force Deadline for transposition in the Member States Official Journal
Directive 2007/66/EC



OJ L 335 of 20.12.2007

Related Acts

Communication of 28 May 2003 from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the European Economic and Social Committee on a comprehensive EU policy against corruption [COM(2003) 317 final – Not published in the Official Journal].
This communication looks at what has been accomplished at EU level in tackling corruption, and shows what needs to be improved in order to tackle it more effectively. It is the Commission’s intention to reduce corruption at all levels in a coherent way within the EU institutions, in EU Member States and outside the EU.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *