Category Archives: Provisions and Instruments of Regional Policy

Cohesion Fund
Cohesion Fund (2007-2013)
Cohesion FundArchives
European Union Solidarity Fund (EUSF)
The European Union Solidarity Fund
Overhaul for EU Solidarity Fund
European Investment Bank (EIB)
The operational priorities of the European Investment
Rural Development and Fisheries

A stronger partnership for the outermost regions

A stronger partnership for the outermost regions

Outline of the Community (European Union) legislation about A stronger partnership for the outermost regions

Topics

These categories group together and put in context the legislative and non-legislative initiatives which deal with the same topic.

Regional policy > Provisions and instruments of regional policy

A stronger partnership for the outermost regions

Document or Iniciative

Commission communication of 26 May 2004. “A stronger partnership for the outermost regions” [COM(2004) 343 final – Not published in the Official Journal].

Summary

Seven of the regions in the European Union are classified as ‘outermost’: the four French overseas departments (Guadeloupe, French Guyana, Martinique and Réunion), the Spanish Autonomous Community of the Canary Islands, and the Portuguese autonomous regions of the Azores and Madeira.

The outermost regions have to cope with specific constraints – remoteness, insularity, small size, difficult topography and climate, as well as economic dependence on a few products – all factors the permanence and combination of which severely restrain their socio-economic development. (Article 299(2) of the EC Treaty).

Priorities for action

The action plan for developing the outermost regions proposed by the Commission will be grouped in three fields of action to take into account their specific needs. The three priorities for action are:

  • promoting accessibility. The proposed measures are designed to reduce the main constraints arising from the isolation of these regions.
  • improving competitiveness. This priority aims to create an economic environment that favours the setting up of businesses. Otherwise, firms remain restricted to a limited local market that is fragmented and remote.
  • prioritising regional intergration. Regional intergration aims to develop trade in goods and services between these regions and neighbouring non-member countries. It is important to encourage their intergration into their surrounding geographical area.

COHESION POLICY REFORM

The strategy comes under the general context of the European Cohesion Policy reform for the period 2007-13. The third report on social and economic cohesion of February 2004 sets out the Commission’s priorities for the cohesion policy after 2006. In the context of the outermost regions, the report states that these regions are eligible for any of the regional policy objectives after 2006: Convergence, Regional Competitiveness and Employment and European Territorial Cooperation.The report also proposes

  • setting up a specific programme to compensate for additional costs;
  • implementing the ‘wider neighbourhood’ action plan.

These elements are the subject of the legislative proposals (proposals for Regulations of 14 July 2004 – general regulation and ERDF Regulation) and non legislative proposals (strategic Community guidelines) by the Commission, in particular within the general context of the reformed European Cohesion Policy.

Additional allocation to compensate for extra costs

For the period 2007-13, the Commission proposes an additional allocation to compensate for the handicaps and constraints of the outermost regions, which cause additional production costs. The program will be financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF).

This allocation aims to reduce the problems set out in the EC Treaty that, along with the factors of competitivity and accessibility, hinder the economy of the outermost regions.

The objectives of the programme are aimed at compensating:

  • difficulties of access due to their great isolation, fragmentation and topography;
  • small regional markets, breaking bulk and no or inadequate economic diversification;
  • environmental and climatic difficulties and the preservation of biodiversity.

The ‘wider neighbourhood’ action plan

A “wider neighbourhood” measure aimed at facilitating cooperation with the neighbouring countries, thereby increasing economic, social and cultural links, trade in goods and services and the movement of people. These regions are very close to the geographical markets of the Caribbean, America and Africa, particularly those of the ACP countries (African, Caribbean and Pacific countries parties to the Cotonou Agreement). This is not a financial instrument, but a Commission initiative in order to coordinate the efforts being made by the Community more efficiently, in all policies concerned.

The reformed European Cohesion Policy’s contribution to this action plan would be included under the new “European territorial cooperation” programme, which is based on two main principles:

  • transnational and cross-border cooperation;
  • trade and customs measures.

The priorities in the context of the European transnational and cross-border cooperation will require the following guidelines to be taken into account:

  • facilitating exchanges as regards transport, services and the information and communications technologies;
  • facilitating exchanges of persons (including the fight against illegal immigration);
  • exchanges of experience as regards regional integration.

The commercial policy’s contribution to this action plan is based on the actions in the field of commercial trade, and customs measures that focus on the need for the outermost regions to be integrated into their regional economy more efficiently. On one hand, the outermost regions must be included in the economic partnership agreements (EPA) between the EU and the ACP countries (ACP-EU) within the general context of the Cotonou Agreement. On the other hand, the outermost regions must be included in the Union’s preferential agreements with other non-member countries. In this context, the customs aspects must be taken into account.

OTHER COMMUNITY POLICIES

As well as the cohesion policy, the instruments used under the other Community policies can also help implement the development strategy for the outermost regions. These instruments come under the context of actions linked to competitiveness, growth and the specific constraints of the outermost regions.

Actions linked to competitiveness and growth

The additional costs impact on most of the sectors of the local economy producing goods and services in the outermost regions. This has resulted in a very poor diversification, an economy that is weak in job-creation and a higher degree of dependency than in the rest of the Union.

To overcome these constraints, this communication proposes the following actions linked to competitivity and growth in the following areas:

  • developing human resources;
  • public services, due to the lack of any real competition between economic operators, whether public or private;
  • innovation, the information society and research and technological development (in conjunction with the objectives of the Lisbon strategy);
  • the environment.

The specific characteristics which affect the situation of the outermost regions must also be taken into account as part of the revision of the guidelines on State aids for regional purposes.

Action on the constraints on the outermost regions

Use of the existing instruments in the fields of air transport and sea transport can reduce the impact of poor access to the outermost regions. The links concerned are those between the outermost regions and mainland Europe (in both directions), between the outermost regions themselves and within those regions.

In addition the Commission proposes several measures in the agriculture sector (regarding the Rural Development Fund, reforming the specific regulations for guidance on the remoteness and insularity (POSEI) or the scheme for the sugar and banana sectors, for example) and in the fisheries sector (under the new European Fisheries Fund, for example), taking into account the fragile production in these sectors.

Context

In order to press ahead with the implementation of Article 299(2) on the EC Treaty of the special status of the outermost regions, the Seville European Council June 2002 invited the Commission to submit a strategy for the outermost regions. The communication of May 2004 following this decision and implements the measures in this communication.

Related Acts

Commission Report, 14 March 2000, on the measures to implement Article 299(2) – the outermost regions of the European Union [COM(2000) 147 final – Not published in the Official Journal].

Commission Report, 19 December 2002, on implementation of Article 299(2) of the EC Treaty: measures to assist the outermost regions [COM(2002) 723 final – Not published in the Official Journal].

Communication from the Commission, 18 February 2004. « A new partnership for Cohesion – Convergence, Competitiveness, Co-operation» Third Report on Economic and Social Coheison [COM(2004) 107 – Not published in the Official Journal].

Proposal for a Council Regulation, 14 July 2004, laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund [COM(2004) 492 final – Not published in the Official Journal].

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council, 14 July 2004, on the European Regional Development Fund [COM(2004) 495 final – Not published in the Official Journal].

Communication from the Commission, 6 August 2004, A stronger partnership for the outermost regions: situation and prospects (COM(2004) 343),

Communication from the Commission, 26 May 2004) [COM(2004) 543 final – Not published in the Official Journal].

Proposal for a Council Regulation establishing a temporary scheme for the restructuring of the sugar industry in the European Community and amending Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 on the financing of the common agricultural policy [COM(2005) 263 final – Not published in the Official Journal].

 

Preparing the future Member States to implement the regional policy in the period 2004-2006

Preparing the future Member States to implement the regional policy in the period 2004-2006

Outline of the Community (European Union) legislation about Preparing the future Member States to implement the regional policy in the period 2004-2006

Topics

These categories group together and put in context the legislative and non-legislative initiatives which deal with the same topic.

Regional policy > Provisions and instruments of regional policy

Preparing the future Member States to implement the regional policy in the period 2004-2006

1) Objective

To assess the progress of the measures taken by the future Member States to manage the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund in the period 2004-2006.

2) Document or Iniciative

Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council of 16 July 2003 on the implementation of the commitments undertaken by the acceding countries in the context of accession negotiations on Chapter 21 – regional policy and coordination of structural instruments [COM(2003) 433 final – Not published in the Official Journal].

3) Summary

During the final accession negotiations with the future Member States, the European Council held in Copenhagen in December 2002 decided to grant the ten countries concerned an overall budget of EUR 21.7 billion for cohesion policy in the period 2004-2006. This amount significantly increases the assistance available to these countries through the pre-accession financial instruments (the Phare, ISPA and SAPARD programmes).

Although their accession is not until 1 May 2004, the future Member States will be eligible for the Structural Funds from 1 January 2004. They must therefore meet the following challenges before the end of 2003:

  • adopt the necessary legislative provisions for transposing the Community acquis on regional policy;
  • introduce administrative structures ensuring the implementation, monitoring and control of the regional development programmes.

The Commission has warned that it cannot approve Community funding until the rules governing the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund are adopted and complied with.

In accordance with its commitment in this regard, the Commission has published a report on the readiness of the future Member States, based on detailed questionnaires addressed to them. Ten essential points need to be urgently resolved:

  • The delay in harmonising and implementing the rules on public procurement, state aids, the environment and equal opportunities is worrying.
    Technical assistance should be used to further strengthen the capacity of the national administrations. Notification of state aid schemes to the Commission must be speeded up. It is necessary to apply the provisions on environmental impact assessment, nature protection and waste management.
  • The future Member States must improve inter-ministerial coordination.
    A full definition of the respective roles of the managing bodies and the intermediate bodies is required. The independence of the certifying role of the paying authority needs to be clarified.
  • Shortcomings have been found in financial management and control.
    A better division of tasks between the management and control bodies is needed. The distinction between the management controls under the responsibility of the managing authority and the independent random sampling controls has to be clarified. Significant work must be done on defining the monitoring indicators and establishing a computerised system to collect and exchange data.
  • Not all the future Member States have yet established adequate accounting systems.
  • The recruitment of additional staff to manage the Structural Funds is behind schedule, particularly in the intermediate bodies and regional administrations.
  • The negotiations on the regional development programmes must be completed between now and the end of 2003.
    Achieving this would enable assistance to begin in January 2004. The future Member States have adopted a simplified programming approach involving a reduced number of operational programmes, priorities and measures, given the short period involved (2 years). Nevertheless, the programmes submitted do not follow a coherent strategy.
  • There are not enough planned measures in the project pipeline.
    The actions planned will not allow the increase in available funding from 2004 to be fully drawn down. Priority should be given to technical assistance measures.
  • Detailed planning of the national matching contribution for the Structural Funds and Cohesion Fund must form part of project preparation.
  • A great effort must be made to ensure implementation of the partnership principle.
  • There are significant delays in introducing monitoring systems.

In November 2003, i.e. six months before accession, the Commission will publish a detailed monitoring report on the extent to which the ten future Member States have fulfilled their commitments in areas governed by the Community acquis. It will pay particular attention to the cohesion policy in the 2004-2006 period.

Once the programmes have been adopted and the provisions for their implementation are definitively in place, the Commission will examine the conformity of the systems.

More information on the launch of programming for the future Member States: Czech Republic, Cyprus, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia.

4) Implementing Measures

5) Follow-Up Work

 

Further indicative guidelines for the future Member States

Further indicative guidelines for the future Member States

Outline of the Community (European Union) legislation about Further indicative guidelines for the future Member States

Topics

These categories group together and put in context the legislative and non-legislative initiatives which deal with the same topic.

Regional policy > Provisions and instruments of regional policy

Further indicative guidelines for the future Member States

1) Objective

To aid the future Member States in the preparation of their programming documents for the period 2004-06.

2) Document or Iniciative

Commission Communication of 12 March 2003 – Further indicative guidelines for the candidate countries [COM(2003) 110 final – Not published in the Official Journal].

3) Summary

In 1999 the Commission published indicative guidelines for the programmes for the period 2000-06 pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999. The aim of this document was to help the national and regional authorities of the Member States draw up their programming documents. This communication does not replace the one issued in 1999, which remains the reference document, but supplements it by providing specific guidelines for the future Member States which take account of the institutional framework of enlargement and the special features of each of them.

The 10 future Member States (Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia) will join the European Union on 1 May 2004. There are at present three financial instruments which are helping them prepare for accession:

  • ISPA, the forerunner of the Cohesion Fund (transport and the environment);
  • SAPARD (adjustment of the agricultural sector and rural areas);
  • the Phare programme (economic and social cohesion, cross-border cooperation).

The European Union is also providing assistance through loans from the European Investment Bank, technical assistance and improved administrative cooperation (twinning). To prepare for the management of the Structural Funds, a road map has identified three successive stages:

  • the designation of the authorities to implement the future programmes by the end of 2001;
  • the submission by the future Member States of development plans and draft programming documents at the time of signing the Treaty of Accession in April 2003;
  • use of the current interval to ratify the Treaties prior to accession to begin negotiations on the programming documents.

The first programming period for the future Member States

The first programming period for the future Member States will be very short (3 years), covering the period from 1 January 2004 to 31 December 2006. In addition, these countries’ administrative capacities will still be limited and in almost all their regions development is lagging behind. That means that Community assistance must be concentrated on the most urgent needs.

The approach adopted limits the number of items of Community assistance:

  • the programming documents;
  • transport:
  • environment: 
  • energy: 
  • fisheries: 
  • agriculture and rural development: 
  • employment and human resources: 
  • research and development: 
  • the business and innovation culture: 
  • the information society: 
    There are considerable disparities in the future Member States as regards telecommunications infrastructures. Progress has been made, particularly as regards broad-band access.
    Most countries need to make substantial investments to meet the Community acquis, which requires basic services (fixed lines, fax and Internet access) to be available everywhere at a reasonable price.
    Structural measures will help implement national and regional strategies for the information society through the eEurope action plan for 2005.

For further information, consult the following summary releases:

  • the challenge of enlargement;
  • the second progress report on economic and social cohesion,
  • the preparation of the future Member States to implement regional policy in 2004-06.

See also the press releases on the beginning of programming in the future Member States: (Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia).

As well as those on adopting programmes in the new Member States: Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia.

4) Implementing Measures

5) Follow-Up Work

 

Provisions and instruments of regional policy

Provisions and instruments of regional policy

Outline of the Community (European Union) legislation about Provisions and instruments of regional policy

Topics

These categories group together and put in context the legislative and non-legislative initiatives which deal with the same topic.

Regional policy > Provisions and instruments of regional policy

Provisions and instruments of regional policy

2007-2013: General Framework

  • General provisions ERDF – ESF – Cohesion Fund (2007-2013)
  • European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) (2007-2013)
  • The European Social Fund (2007-2013)
  • European grouping of territorial cooperation (EGTC)
  • Interinstitutional Agreement on cooperation in budgetary matters

2007-2013: Rural Development and Fisheries

  • European Union strategic guidelines for rural development
  • Financing the common agricultural policy
  • European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD)
  • Specific measures for the outermost regions
  • Specific measures in favour of the smaller Aegean islands
  • Access for rural areas to ICTs
  • European Fisheries Fund
  • Detailed rules for the implementation of the EFF Regulation

2000-2006: General Framework

  • Structural policy reform
  • Guidelines for programmes in 2000-2006
  • Revised guidelines for 2000-2006 programmes
  • Further indicative guidelines for the future Member States
  • Preparing the future Member States to implement the regional policy in the period 2004-2006

2000-2006: 3 Priority Objectives

  • Objective 1
  • Objective 2
  • Objective 3

2000-2006: 4 Community Initiatives

  • INTERREG III (2000-2006)
  • INTERREG III C
  • EQUAL
  • LEADER+
  • URBAN II

2000-2006: Specific Areas

  • 2000-06: support for rural development within the framework of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF)
  • Community action for regions bordering the candidate countries
  • Development and integrated management of coastal zones
  • A stronger partnership for the outermost regions
  • Northern Ireland: PEACE II programme (2000-2006)

2000-2006: Structural Funds

  • General provisions on the Structural Funds
  • ERDF: European Regional Development Fund
  • Innovative actions under the ERDF: 2000-06
  • The financing of the common agricultural policy (CAP)
  • ESF: European Social Fund.
  • FIFG: Financial Instrument for Fisheries Guidance

Cohesion Fund

  • Cohesion Fund (2007-2013)
  • Cohesion Fund

European Union Solidarity Fund (EUSF)

  • The European Union Solidarity Fund
  • Overhaul for EU Solidarity Fund

European Investment Bank (EIB)

  • The operational priorities of the European Investment Bank

Financing the common agricultural policy

Financing the common agricultural policy

Outline of the Community (European Union) legislation about Financing the common agricultural policy

Topics

These categories group together and put in context the legislative and non-legislative initiatives which deal with the same topic.

Agriculture > General framework

Financing the common agricultural policy

Document or Iniciative

Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 of 21 June 2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy [See amending acts].

Summary

This Regulation establishes a single legal framework for financing CAP spending, creating two new funds: the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD). Although operating in a similar fashion, each has certain specific features. Since some of the measures financed by these funds are those managed jointly with Member States, the Regulation sets out conditions under which the Commission may exercise its responsibilities for implementing the general budget and clarifies the areas in which Member States are obliged to cooperate.

The Regulation lays down the conditions under which Member States can accredit and withdraw accreditation from paying agencies and coordinating bodies. The agencies are responsible for making payments, whilst the bodies monitor the accounting carried out by the paying agencies. It also provides for the creation of certification bodies, public or private legal bodies appointed by the Member States which are responsible for certifying the management, monitoring and control systems implemented by the accredited paying agencies and the agencies’ annual accounts. The Member States are asked to take all necessary steps to effectively protect the financial interests of the Community. In addition, only expenditure incurred by accredited paying agencies will be financed by the Community and payments will be made in full to the beneficiaries.

EAGF

As regards expenditure managed jointly by the Member States and the Commission, the EAGF finances:

  • refunds for exporting farm produce to non-EU countries;
  • intervention measures to regulate agricultural markets;
  • direct payments to farmers under the CAP;
  • certain informational and promotional measures for farm produce implemented by Member States both on the internal EU market and outside it;
  • expenditure on restructuring measures in the sugar industry under Council Regulation (EC) No 320/2006;
  • programmes promoting the consumption of fruit in schools.

As regards expenditure managed centrally by the Commission, EAGF financing covers:

  • the Community’s financial contribution for specific veterinary measures, veterinary inspection and inspections of foodstuffs and animal feed, animal disease eradication and control programmes and plant-health measures;
  • promotion of farm produce, either directly by the Commission or via international organisations;
  • measures required by Community legislation to conserve, characterise, collect and use genetic resources in farming;
  • setting up and running farm accounting information systems;
  • farm survey systems;
  • expenditure relating to fisheries markets.

The monies to cover expenditure financed by the EAGF are paid by the Commission to the Member States in the form of monthly reimbursements. These are made on the basis of a declaration of expenditure and other information provided by the Member States. If funds are committed without following the Community rules, the Commission may decide to reduce or suspend payments.

The Commission sets the net balance available for EAGF spending and will put in place a monthly early-warning and monitoring system for such spending. Every month, it will present the Parliament and Council with a report examining spending trends in relation to the profiles set at the beginning of the financial year and assessing how these are likely to develop in the current year.

Any amounts recovered as a result of irregularities or negligence are paid to the paying agencies, which must book them in the month they are actually received as revenue earmarked for EAGF spending only.

EAFRD

The EAFRD finances rural development programmes implemented in accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 solely where expenditure is jointly managed.

The budget commitments for this purpose will be made annually in the form of prefinancing, interim payments and payment of the final balance. Interim payments will be made for each rural development programme subject to the budget funding available within the ceiling limits established by Community legislation and the increased amounts laid down by the Commission in applying provisions laid down for direct payments to farmers and for the wine market. These payments will be made subject to certain conditions: for example, the Commission must be sent a declaration of expenditure and a payment claim certified by the accredited paying agency. If this declaration does not comply with the Community standards, the Commission may reduce or suspend payments.

In the event of any irregularities, Community financing will be totally or partially cancelled or, if the monies in question have already been paid to the beneficiary, they will be recovered by the accredited paying agency. The cancelled or recovered amounts may be used by the Member State for a different operation planned under the same rural development programme.

As regards payment of the balance, this is not made until the Commission has received the final implementing report on the implementation of a rural development programme and the corresponding clearance decision. If the necessary documents are not sent to the Commission, the balance will be automatically decommitted.

Commission controls

The Commission will ensure that the financial management of the Community Funds is sound, mainly through a two-stage clearance procedure: clearance of accounts and conformity clearance. The Member States must keep for the Commission all the information needed for the smooth running of the Funds. To supplement checks made by the Member States under national legislation, the Commission may organise on-site audits of its own. Payments made to a Member State under the EAGF and EAFRD may be reduced or suspended where certain serious and persistent deficiencies are detected.

The names of the beneficiaries of the Agricultural Funds, and the amounts they have received, must be made public after payment has been made.

References

Act Entry into force Deadline for transposition in the Member States Official Journal
Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005

18.8.2005

OJ L 209 of 11.8.2005
Amending act(s) Entry into force Deadline for transposition in the Member States Official Journal
Regulation (EC) No 320/2006

3.3.2006

OJ L 58 of 28.2.2006

Regulation (EC) No 378/2007

12.4.2007

OJ L 95 of 5.4.2007

Regulation (EC) No 1437/2007

15.12.2007

OJ L 322 of 7.12.2007

Regulaton (EC) No 479/2008

13.6.2008

OJ L 148 of 6.6.2008

Regulation (EC) No 13/2009

16.1.2009

OJ L 5 of 9.1.2009

Regulation (EC) No 73/2009

1.2.2009

OJ L 30 of 31.1.2009

Regulation (EC) No 473/2009

9.6.2009

OJ L 144 of 9.6.2009

Successive amendments and corrections to Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 have been incorporated into the basic text. This consolidated versionis for reference only.

RELATED ACTS

Available amounts and excluded expenditure

Decision 2008/321/EC [Official Journal L 109 of 19.4.2008].

This Decision contains a list of expenditure items excluded from Community financing because they do not comply with the CAP financing rules. The exclusion of such expenditure items, incurred by the paying agencies of certain Member States between 2002 and 2007, is a consequence of verifications, bilateral discussions and conciliation procedures and entails the deduction of the amounts concerned.

Decision 2009/379/EC [Official Journal L 117 of 12.5.2009].

The Decision lays down the amounts made available to the EAFRD and EAGF for the period 2007-2013.

Detailed rules for application

Regulation (EC) No 883/2006 [Official Journal L 171 of 23.6.2006].

This Regulation lays down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 as regards the keeping of accounts by the paying agencies, declarations of expenditure and revenue and the conditions for reimbursing expenditure under the EAGF and the EAFRD.
See consolidated version .

Regulation (EC) No 884/2006[Official Journal L 171 of 23.6.2006].

This Regulation lays down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 as regards the financing by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) of intervention measures in the form of public storage operations and the accounting of public storage operations by the paying agencies of the Member States.
See consolidated version .

Regulation (EC) No 885/2006 [Official Journal L 171 of 23.6.2006].

This Regulation lays down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 as regards the accreditation of paying agencies and other bodies and the clearance of the accounts of the EAGF and of the EAFRD.
See consolidated version .

Regulation (EC) No 259/2008 [Official Journal L 76 of 19.3.2008].

This Regulation lays down detailed rules for the application of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 as regards the publication of information on the beneficiaries of funds deriving from the EAGF and the EAFRD. This information must be published on a single website by 30 April of each year and must include beneficiaries’ personal details and the amounts received.

Clearance of accounts

Regulation (EC) No 941/2008 [Official Journal L 258 of 9.10.2009].

This Regulation lays down the form and content of the accounting information to be submitted to the Commission for the purpose of the clearance of the accounts of the EAGF and EAFRD, as well as for monitoring and forecasting purposes.

Decision 2009/373/EC [Official Journal L 116 of 9.5.2009].

This Decision presents the clearance of the accounts of the paying agencies of Member States concerning expenditure financed by the EAFRD for the 2008 financial year.

Decision 2009/367/EC [Official Journal L111 of 5.5.2009].

This Decision presents the clearance of the accounts of the paying agencies of Member States concerning expenditure financed by the EAGF for the 2008 financial year.

Irregularities, fraud and recovery

Regulation (EC) No 1848/2006 [Official Journal L 355 of 15.12.2006].

This act sets out information and investigation measures to be taken by the Member States in cases of fraud in connection with the financing of the CAP and sets up an information system in this field.

Surveys

Regulation (EC) No 78/2008 [Official Journal L 25 of 30.1.2008].

This act relates to the measures to be undertaken by the Commission in 2008-2013 making use of the remote-sensing applications developed within the framework of the common agricultural policy.


Another Normative about Financing the common agricultural policy

Topics

These categories group together and put in context the legislative and non-legislative initiatives which deal with the same topic

Regional policy > Provisions and instruments of regional policy

Financing the common agricultural policy

Document or Iniciative

Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 of 21 June 2005 on the financing of the common agricultural policy [See amending acts].

Summary

This Regulation establishes a single legal framework for financing CAP spending, creating two new funds: the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD). Although operating in a similar fashion, each has certain specific features. Since some of the measures financed by these funds are those managed jointly with Member States, the Regulation sets out conditions under which the Commission may exercise its responsibilities for implementing the general budget and clarifies the areas in which Member States are obliged to cooperate.

The Regulation lays down the conditions under which Member States can accredit and withdraw accreditation from paying agencies and coordinating bodies. The agencies are responsible for making payments, whilst the bodies monitor the accounting carried out by the paying agencies. It also provides for the creation of certification bodies, public or private legal bodies appointed by the Member States which are responsible for certifying the management, monitoring and control systems implemented by the accredited paying agencies and the agencies’ annual accounts. The Member States are asked to take all necessary steps to effectively protect the financial interests of the Community. In addition, only expenditure incurred by accredited paying agencies will be financed by the Community and payments will be made in full to the beneficiaries.

EAGF

As regards expenditure managed jointly by the Member States and the Commission, the EAGF finances:

  • refunds for exporting farm produce to non-EU countries;
  • intervention measures to regulate agricultural markets;
  • direct payments to farmers under the CAP;
  • certain informational and promotional measures for farm produce implemented by Member States both on the internal EU market and outside it;
  • expenditure on restructuring measures in the sugar industry under Council Regulation (EC) No 320/2006;
  • programmes promoting the consumption of fruit in schools.

As regards expenditure managed centrally by the Commission, EAGF financing covers:

  • the Community’s financial contribution for specific veterinary measures, veterinary inspection and inspections of foodstuffs and animal feed, animal disease eradication and control programmes and plant-health measures;
  • promotion of farm produce, either directly by the Commission or via international organisations;
  • measures required by Community legislation to conserve, characterise, collect and use genetic resources in farming;
  • setting up and running farm accounting information systems;
  • farm survey systems;
  • expenditure relating to fisheries markets.

The monies to cover expenditure financed by the EAGF are paid by the Commission to the Member States in the form of monthly reimbursements. These are made on the basis of a declaration of expenditure and other information provided by the Member States. If funds are committed without following the Community rules, the Commission may decide to reduce or suspend payments.

The Commission sets the net balance available for EAGF spending and will put in place a monthly early-warning and monitoring system for such spending. Every month, it will present the Parliament and Council with a report examining spending trends in relation to the profiles set at the beginning of the financial year and assessing how these are likely to develop in the current year.

Any amounts recovered as a result of irregularities or negligence are paid to the paying agencies, which must book them in the month they are actually received as revenue earmarked for EAGF spending only.

EAFRD

The EAFRD finances rural development programmes implemented in accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 solely where expenditure is jointly managed.

The budget commitments for this purpose will be made annually in the form of prefinancing, interim payments and payment of the final balance. Interim payments will be made for each rural development programme subject to the budget funding available within the ceiling limits established by Community legislation and the increased amounts laid down by the Commission in applying provisions laid down for direct payments to farmers and for the wine market. These payments will be made subject to certain conditions: for example, the Commission must be sent a declaration of expenditure and a payment claim certified by the accredited paying agency. If this declaration does not comply with the Community standards, the Commission may reduce or suspend payments.

In the event of any irregularities, Community financing will be totally or partially cancelled or, if the monies in question have already been paid to the beneficiary, they will be recovered by the accredited paying agency. The cancelled or recovered amounts may be used by the Member State for a different operation planned under the same rural development programme.

As regards payment of the balance, this is not made until the Commission has received the final implementing report on the implementation of a rural development programme and the corresponding clearance decision. If the necessary documents are not sent to the Commission, the balance will be automatically decommitted.

Commission controls

The Commission will ensure that the financial management of the Community Funds is sound, mainly through a two-stage clearance procedure: clearance of accounts and conformity clearance. The Member States must keep for the Commission all the information needed for the smooth running of the Funds. To supplement checks made by the Member States under national legislation, the Commission may organise on-site audits of its own. Payments made to a Member State under the EAGF and EAFRD may be reduced or suspended where certain serious and persistent deficiencies are detected.

The names of the beneficiaries of the Agricultural Funds, and the amounts they have received, must be made public after payment has been made.

References

Act Entry into force Deadline for transposition in the Member States Official Journal
Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005

18.8.2005

OJ L 209 of 11.8.2005

Amending act(s)
Entry into force Deadline for transposition in the Member States Official Journal
Regulation (EC) No 320/2006

3.3.2006

OJ L 58 of 28.2.2006

Regulation (EC) No 378/2007

12.4.2007

OJ L 95 of 5.4.2007

Regulation (EC) No 1437/2007

15.12.2007

OJ L 322 of 7.12.2007

Regulaton (EC) No 479/2008

13.6.2008

OJ L 148 of 6.6.2008

Regulation (EC) No 13/2009

16.1.2009

OJ L 5 of 9.1.2009

Regulation (EC) No 73/2009

1.2.2009

OJ L 30 of 31.1.2009

Regulation (EC) No 473/2009

9.6.2009

OJ L 144 of 9.6.2009

Successive amendments and corrections to Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 have been incorporated into the basic text. This consolidated versionis for reference only.

RELATED ACTS

Available amounts and excluded expenditure

Decision 2008/321/EC [Official Journal L 109 of 19.4.2008].

This Decision contains a list of expenditure items excluded from Community financing because they do not comply with the CAP financing rules. The exclusion of such expenditure items, incurred by the paying agencies of certain Member States between 2002 and 2007, is a consequence of verifications, bilateral discussions and conciliation procedures and entails the deduction of the amounts concerned.

Decision 2009/379/EC [Official Journal L 117 of 12.5.2009].

The Decision lays down the amounts made available to the EAFRD and EAGF for the period 2007-2013.

Detailed rules for application

Regulation (EC) No 883/2006 [Official Journal L 171 of 23.6.2006].

This Regulation lays down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 as regards the keeping of accounts by the paying agencies, declarations of expenditure and revenue and the conditions for reimbursing expenditure under the EAGF and the EAFRD.
See consolidated version .

Regulation (EC) No 884/2006[Official Journal L 171 of 23.6.2006].

This Regulation lays down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 as regards the financing by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) of intervention measures in the form of public storage operations and the accounting of public storage operations by the paying agencies of the Member States.
See consolidated version .

Regulation (EC) No 885/2006 [Official Journal L 171 of 23.6.2006].

This Regulation lays down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 as regards the accreditation of paying agencies and other bodies and the clearance of the accounts of the EAGF and of the EAFRD.
See consolidated version .

Regulation (EC) No 259/2008 [Official Journal L 76 of 19.3.2008].

This Regulation lays down detailed rules for the application of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 as regards the publication of information on the beneficiaries of funds deriving from the EAGF and the EAFRD. This information must be published on a single website by 30 April of each year and must include beneficiaries’ personal details and the amounts received.

Clearance of accounts

Regulation (EC) No 941/2008 [Official Journal L 258 of 9.10.2009].

This Regulation lays down the form and content of the accounting information to be submitted to the Commission for the purpose of the clearance of the accounts of the EAGF and EAFRD, as well as for monitoring and forecasting purposes.

Decision 2009/373/EC [Official Journal L 116 of 9.5.2009].

This Decision presents the clearance of the accounts of the paying agencies of Member States concerning expenditure financed by the EAFRD for the 2008 financial year.

Decision 2009/367/EC [Official Journal L111 of 5.5.2009].

This Decision presents the clearance of the accounts of the paying agencies of Member States concerning expenditure financed by the EAGF for the 2008 financial year.

Irregularities, fraud and recovery

Regulation (EC) No 1848/2006 [Official Journal L 355 of 15.12.2006].

This act sets out information and investigation measures to be taken by the Member States in cases of fraud in connection with the financing of the CAP and sets up an information system in this field.

Surveys

Regulation (EC) No 78/2008 [Official Journal L 25 of 30.1.2008].

This act relates to the measures to be undertaken by the Commission in 2008-2013 making use of the remote-sensing applications developed within the framework of the common agricultural policy.

INTERREG III C

INTERREG III C

Outline of the Community (European Union) legislation about INTERREG III C

Topics

These categories group together and put in context the legislative and non-legislative initiatives which deal with the same topic.

Regional policy > Provisions and instruments of regional policy

INTERREG III C

This communication explains the method for implementing interregional cooperation activities under strand C of the INTERREG III Community Initiative for 2000-06 (INTERREG III C).

Document or Iniciative

Commission Communication to the Member States of 7 May 2001 – “Interregional cooperation” – Strand C of the INTERREG III Community initiative [C(2001) 1188 final – Official Journal of 15.5.2001].

Summary

The regions have shown a growing interest in interregional cooperation, not only in the context of INTERREG II, but also through the innovative actions of the Structural Funds (RIS/RITTS, RISI, TERRA, RECITE; ECOS-Ouverture, Urban Development) and the Promotion of Innovation and Encouragement of SMEs Participation Programme (1998-2002) of the Fifth RTD Framework Programme.

Interregional cooperation brings a further dimension into cross-border cooperation (Strand A) and transnational cooperation (Strand B) under INTERREG III. It allows regions which are not necessarily direct neighbours to enter into contact and to build up relationships, leading to exchanges of experience and networking which will assist the balanced, harmonious and sustainable development of the European Union and third countries.

The general provisions on the Structural Funds and the INTERREG III guidelines lay down the general framework for Strand C of the Community Initiative. This Communication gives details on how the method is to be implemented.

GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF INTERREGIONAL COOPERATION

The objective of interregional cooperation is to improve the effectiveness of policies and instruments for regional development and cohesion. By encouraging a more strategic approach by programme, the Commission proposes that INTERREG III C should operate as a general framework for promoting exchanges of experience. In the long term, collaboration between authorities and public bodies, whether or not they are eligible for assistance from the Structural Funds, should bring about stable and consistent cooperation.

The total budget for INTERREG III during the period 2000 to 2006 is EUR 4 875 million, broken down into allocations adopted by the Commission for each Member State. 6 % of those allocations are earmarked for Strand C.

Eligible areas and participation of non-Community countries

The entire territory of the European Community is eligible for part-financing by the ERDF under INTERREG III C.

Participation by non-Member countries, in particular the candidate countries, islands and outermost regions, will receive special attention during the selection process. As with Interreg III as a whole, financing for non-Community countries to participate in Strand C may be provided from their own resources or, where appropriate, through the relevant Community funding for foreign policy (Phare, Tacis, CARDS, Meda, EDF). Travel and subsistence expenses of partners from outside the Community can be eligible for part-financing where the operation in which they are taking part takes place in the European Union.

Topics for cooperation

INTERREG III C has the following five priority topics:

Exchange of information and experience on the types of project assisted underand of the Structural Funds.

  • Exchange of experience and networking among border areas and among transnational areas on the implementation of INTERREG programmes.
    This topic is limited to public authorities (or equivalent bodies) involved in current or previous INTERREG programmes.
  • Dissemination of urban development practices through concrete exchange of experience.
    This topic is open to all cities and urban areas, with priority to proposals containing at least one city or urban area receiving funding from Structural Fund programmes.
  • Interregional cooperation linking regions involved in one or more of the themes of the regional innovative actions for 2000-06, namely: (a) regional economy based on knowledge and technological innovation, (b) e-EuropeRegio: the information society and regional development, and (c) regional identity and sustainable development.
    The strategy contained in the regional innovative actions programme may be based on one of the three priorities or a combination, but may not involve setting up networks.
  • Other subjects appropriate to cooperation: spatial planning, maritime cooperation, insular and ultraperipheral issues, natural and man-made catastrophes, low population density or mountainous conditions.
    Other more general topics may also be treated: research and technological development, information society, tourism, culture, employment, enterprise and the environment.

Programming

The four programming zones are set out in Annex A to the Communication (south, north-west, north-east and east). The Member States allocate a proportion of their financial allocation for INTERREG III C to the programmes in which they are taking part, in proportion to the population living in each area. Although projects may be included only in the programme for the zone in which the lead partner is located, cooperation between partners from different zones is encouraged. Thus, at least 75 % of the ERDF allocation must involve operations with at least one partner located outside the zone covered by the programme.

The content of operational programmes under Community initiatives is similar to that of single programming documents (SDPs) provided for in the general Regulation on the Structural Funds and must comply with other Community policies as set out in the Commission’s general guidelines for 2000-06 programmes. They contain all the topics for cooperation explained above and the three types of operations presented below.

Taking due account of the particularities of Strand C, programmes operate under the same rules and conditions as those laid down for Strands A and B in the general guidelines for Interreg III and the general regulation on the Structural Funds. They all include a detailed description of the financial management arrangements and the procedures for monitoring, checks and evaluation, clearly indicating the responsibilities of all those involved. The competent authorities must set up monitoring and control indicators.

Types of operation

Three types of operations are eligible for part-financing under INTERREG III C:

  • Regional framework operations aimed at exchanging the experience gained by a group of regions on methodology and project management, with the aim of developing a clear strategic approach based on a limited number of projects.
    These regional framework operations are a new type of operation and cover all five priority topics for cooperation. They may receive between EUR 500 000 and EUR 5 million from the ERDF and should account for between 50 % and 80 % of the funding for each INTERREG III C programme.
    They include an interregional cooperation strategy, the partners, the objectives and the expected results, the distribution of the funding among the partners (no more than 40 % for the lead partner), the work plan and a detailed timetable, descriptions of a limited number of projects and indicative selection criteria, an assessment of the operation’s potential impact on other Structural Fund programmes and the main target groups.
    These operations are intended for a group of regional authorities (or equivalent regional bodies) in at least three countries, two of which should be Member States. No region may participate in more than two operations.
  • Individual interregional cooperation projects are aimed at exchanging experience on methodology and project management. In addition to the transfer of knowledge, the aim is to establish genuine cooperation with a view to transplanting project results from one region into another with a clear impact in the recipient region.
    These projects cover all five priority topics for cooperation and involve partners from least three countries, two of which should be Member States. They should account for between 10 and 30 % of the funding for each INTERREG III C programme and receive ERDF funding of between EUR 200 000 and EUR 1 million.
  • Networks aiming to link the various regions inside and outside the European Union on project implementation methods and development.
    The work programmes of networks cover the five priority topics for cooperation, except for those dealt with by the regional innovative actions for 2000-2006, and may include the following measures: seminars, conferences, Internet sites, data bases, study trips and exchange of staff.
    Networks should account for between 10 % and 20 % of the funding for each INTERREG III C programme and receive ERDF funding of between EUR 200 000 and EUR 1 million.

The lead partner presents the operation to the management authority for the programme covering the zone in which it is located. The Commission encourages the lead partner to conclude cooperation agreements with the other partners defining all the legal and financial responsibilities.

The financial flows between the lead partner, the other partners and the paying body differ depending on the type of operation concerned. In the case of regional framework operations, the choice of whether the financial flows should be centralised or decentralised falls to the parties involved in the operation. Flows are always centralised to the lead partner in the case of individual interregional projects and networks.

Related Acts

Proposal of 14 July 2004 for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a European grouping of cross-border cooperation (EGCC) [COM(2004) 496 final].

Proposal of 14 July 2004 for a Council Regulation laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund [COM(2004) 492 final].

Proposal of 14 July 2004 for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Regional Development Fund [COM(2004) 495 final].

Objective 2

Objective 2

Outline of the Community (European Union) legislation about Objective 2

Topics

These categories group together and put in context the legislative and non-legislative initiatives which deal with the same topic.

Regional policy > Provisions and instruments of regional policy

Objective 2

The main goal of regional policy in the European Union is economic and social cohesion. This is based on financial solidarity, whereby more than 35 % of the Union’s budget is transferred to the less-favoured regions (EUR 213 billion in 2000-06 plus EUR 21.74 billion approved for the ten new Member States). Those regions in the Union lagging behind in their development, undergoing restructuring or facing specific geographical, economic or social problems are to be put in a better position to cope with their difficulties and to benefit fully from the opportunities offered by the single market.

The amount of support that regions receive through the EU’s regional policy depends on their level of development and the type of difficulties they are facing. The Structural Fund regulations for 2000-06 provide, in particular, for three priority objectives:

  • : to promote the development and structural adjustment of regions whose development is lagging behind;
  • Objective 2: to support the economic and social conversion of areas experiencing structural difficulties;
  • : to support the adaptation and modernisation of education, training and employment policies and systems in regions not eligible under Objective 1.

This information sheet concerns Objective 2 only. The other Objectives are the subject of separate sheets.

GEOGRAPHICAL ELIGIBILITY

The reform of the Structural Funds under Agenda 2000 recommends concentrating structural assistance on the most pressing development problems. The new Objective 2 of the Structural Funds for 2000-06 brings together the former Objectives 2 (conversion of declining industrial regions) and 5(b) (development of rural areas) from 1994-99.

Like Objective 1, Objective 2 is “regionalised”, meaning that it applies to areas defined according to specific statistical and socio-economic criteria. Since the regions covered by this Objective are facing structural difficulties, the Community assistance they receive is intended to support their economic and social conversion. Eligibility depends on a population ceiling, and on criteria specific to each area. An exhaustive list is then drawn up of the eligible regions.

Population ceiling

The population of all the areas eligible for Objective 2 of the Structural Funds may not be more than 18 % of the total population of the Community, i.e. no less than two thirds of the population previously covered by Objectives 2 and 5(b). Following enlargement, for the ten new Member States the ceiling is 31 % of the population of all the NUTS II regions covered by Objective 2 in each of those countries. Decision 1999/503/EC [Official Journal L 194 of 27.7.1999] of 1 July 1999 requires the Commission to set a ceiling in each Member State on the population eligible for Objective 2 in 2000-06. These ceilings are as follows:

Member State Population
(million inhabitants)
% of the national population
Germany 10.30 13
Austria 1.99 25
Belgium 1.27 12
Denmark 0.54 10
Spain 8.81 22
Finland 1.58 31
France 18.77 31
Italy 7.4 13
Luxembourg 0.11 28
Netherlands 2.33 15
United Kingdom 13.84 24
Sweden 1.22 14
European Union 68.17 18

The Act concerning the conditions of accession to the European Union of the ten new Member States [OJ L 236, 23.9.2003] contains the ceilings for those countries for the period 1 May 2004 to 31 December 2006. Only three of those countries have population ceilings for obtaining aid under Objective 2. They are:

  • the Czech Republic: 0.37 million inhabitants
  • Slovakia: 0.19 million inhabitants
  • Cyprus: 0.21 million inhabitants

Criteria specific to each type of area

The areas eligible under Objective 2 are those undergoing socio-economic change in the industrial and service sectors, declining rural areas, urban areas in difficulty and depressed areas dependent on fisheries. The criteria for defining them are as follows.

Areas undergoing socio-economic change in the industrial and service sectors:

  • These areas must correspond to a NUTS level III territorial unit in the nomenclature developed by Eurostat.
  • Their average unemployment rate recorded over the three years before 1999 must have been higher than the Community average.
  • They must have a percentage share of industrial employment in total employment equal to or greater than the Community average in any reference year from 1985 onwards.
  • Industrial employment must have been falling constantly for several years.

Geographical areas whose population or area is significant, which meet the above criteria and are adjacent to an industrial area are also eligible.

These areas undergoing socio-economic change in the industrial and service sectors continue to suffer job losses, not only in the traditional industries (textiles, cars, coal and steel) but also in services. The development of new activities and retraining of workers are strongly encouraged.

Declining rural areas:

  • These areas must correspond to a NUTS level III territorial unit in the nomenclature developed by Eurostat.
  • They must have either a population density of less than 100 people per km², or a percentage share of agricultural employment in total employment which is at least double the Community average in any reference year from 1985 onwards.
  • They must have either an average unemployment rate recorded over the three years before 1999 that is above the Community average, or a decline in population since 1985.

Rural areas with serious socio-economic problems arising from the ageing of or decline in the agricultural working population may also be eligible.

Rural areas are undergoing radical change. Farming is no longer a major source of employment but continues to occupy most rural land. Revitalising these areas and maintaining the population there requires new competitive activities and closer links with urban centres.

Urban areas in difficulty are densely populated areas that meet at least one of the following criteria:

  • a rate of long-term unemployment higher than the Community average;
  • a high level of poverty, including poor housing conditions;
  • a particularly damaged environment;
  • a high rate of crime and antisocial behaviour;
  • low educational standards among the population.

The urban issue is at the heart of economic, social and territorial change. Towns and cities have a high degree of development potential and cooperate among themselves in networks. But they are also home to many disparities in development, as witnessed by the existence of depressed districts where social exclusion and poverty are rife. However, although our towns and cities exert high pressure on the environment, they nevertheless play a role as vectors of development for surrounding rural areas.

Depressed areas dependent on fisheries are coastal areas with a significant number of jobs in the fisheries industry as a percentage of total employment. They are also facing structural socio-economic problems relating to the restructuring of the fisheries sector, which has resulted in a significant reduction in the number of jobs in that sector.

Objective 2, therefore, concerns four types of geographical area. Areas facing or threatened by serious structural problems or a high level of unemployment arising from an ongoing or planned restructuring in agriculture, industry or the services sector are also eligible. Where there is a serious crisis in a region, the Commission may act on a proposal from a Member State to amend the list of areas during 2003, provided this does not increase the population covered within each region.

List of eligible regions

As a first step, each Member State draws up its own indicative list of significant areas, which it submits to the Commission together with the statistics and other information, at the most appropriate geographical level, needed to evaluate the proposals. The Commission, in close consultation with the Member States, then draws up the definitive list of areas eligible under Objective 2 for 2000-06 for each Member State of the European Union. The decisions containing these lists are available on the Inforegio website of the Directorate-General for regional policy:

Member State Decision Official Journal
Germany Decision 2000/201/EC OJ L66 of 14.3.2000
Austria Decision 2000/289/EC

(amended by Decision 2000/607/EC)
OJ L99 of 19.04.2000
(Official Journal L 258 of 12.10.2000)
Belgium Decision 2000/119/EC OJ L39 of 14.02.2000
Denmark Decision 2000/121/EC OJ L39 of 14.02.2000
Spain Decision 2000/264/EC OJ L84 of 05.04.2000
Finland Decision 2000/120/EC OJ L39 of 14.02.2000
France Decision 2000/339/EC

(amended by Decision 2000/607/EC)

(amended by Decision 2003/679/EC)
OJ L123 of 24.05.2000
(OJ L258 of 12.10.2000)
(Official Journal L 249 of 01.10.2003)
Italy Decision 2000/530/EC

(amended by Decision 2001/363/EC)
OJ L223 of 04.09.2000
(OJ L129, 11.05.2001)
Luxembourg Decision 2000/277/EC OJ L87 of 08.04.2000
Netherlands Decision 2000/118/EC OJ L39 of 14.02.2000
United Kingdom Decision 2000/290/EC

(amended by Decision 2001/201/EC)
OJ L99 of 19.04.2000
(OJ L78, 16.03.2001)
Sweden Decision 2000/220/EC OJ L69 of 17.03.2000

Greece, Ireland and Portugal are not concerned by Objective 2, since their entire territory is covered by Objective 1. Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta and Slovenia are in the same situation.

Transitional support is also available for EU 15 regions which were eligible for the former Objectives 2 and 5(b) in 1994-99 but which do not qualify for Objective 2 in 2000-06. This transitional support, which decreases over time, is granted to prevent a sudden interruption in financial assistance from the Structural Funds and consolidate the progress achieved during the previous programming period. It is granted for six years, from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2005. The transitional support for these areas is provided by the ERDF. They may also receive assistance from the EAGGF Guarantee Section for rural development, from the FIFG under the common fisheries policy, or from the European Social Fund (ESF) under Objective 3 for structural conversion.

PROGRAMMING DOCUMENTS

Programming is an essential part of implementing EU regional policy. The first stage is for the Member States to present regional development plans. These include a precise description of the economic and social situation of the country by region, a description of the most appropriate strategy for achieving the stated development objectives and indications on the use and form of the financial contribution from the Structural Funds.

The Member States then submit programming documents to the Commission, following its general guidelines. In the case of Objective 2, these programming documents take the form of single programming documents (SPDs).

. The Objective 2 SPDs coordinate all Community structural assistance, including rural development measures but not including assistance for human resources granted under Objective 3. These documents describe the strategy and priorities selected and provide a short description of the proposed measures and an indicative financing plan showing the eligible public/private financing. They also lay down the arrangements for financial management, monitoring, evaluation and control. In all, 96 regional programmes are being implemented in the 12 Member States covered by Objective 2. You can consult summaries of the SPDs on the Inforegio website of the Directorate-General for regional policy.

FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

Funding

For 2000-06, the allocation to the Structural Funds is EUR 195 billion, to which must be added EUR 14.1559 billion for the ten new Member States for the period from accession to 31 December 2006. The allocation for Objective 2 is EUR 22.5 billion over seven years (11.5 % of the total) for the old Member States and EUR 0.12 billion over two and a half years for the new Member States (0.86 % of the total allocated to those countries), shared between the ERDF and the ESF, with EUR 2.721 billion earmarked for transitional support.

The Cohesion Fund grants assistance only to Greece, Portugal, Ireland and Spain, i.e. the countries whose gross domestic product (GDP) is less than 90 % of the Community average. It finances operations in the fields of environment and transport. Since the whole of Greece, Portugal and Ireland are eligible under Objective 1, only certain regions of Spain eligible under Objective 2 (Aragon, the Balearic Islands, Catalonia, Rioja, Madrid, Navarre and the Basque Country) also receive assistance from the Cohesion Fund.

Commission Decision 1999/504/EC of 1 July 1999 [Official Journal L 194 of 27.7.1999] fixes an indicative allocation by Member State of the commitment appropriations for Objective 2 of the Structural Funds for 2000-06 as shown below:

Member State Objective 2
(million)
Transitional support
(million)
Germany 2 984 526
Austria 578 102
Belgium 368 65
Denmark 156 27
Spain 2 553 98
Finland 459 30
France 5 437 613
Italy 2 145 377
Luxembourg 34 6
Netherlands 676 119
United Kingdom 3 989 706
Sweden 354 52
European Union 19 733 2 721

For the new Member States, the allocation for Objective 2 represents 0.86 % of the resources of the Structural Funds. The indicative allocation of commitment appropriations is the following:

  • Czech Republic: EUR 63.3 million
  • Slovakia: EUR 33 million
  • Cyprus: EUR 24. billion

Contribution of the Funds

As a general rule, the contribution of the Structural Funds under Objective 2 is subject to the following ceilings: no more than 50 % of the total eligible volume and at least 25 % of eligible public expenditure.

In the case of investment in firms, the contribution of the Funds is subject to the ceilings on the rate of aid and on combinations of aid laid down in the field of state aids.

In cases where assistance involves financing investments that will generate income (such as bridges or toll motorways), the expected revenue is taken into account when determining the contribution of the Funds. Under Objective 2, the contribution of the Funds is subject to the following ceilings:

  • In the case of investments in infrastructure generating substantial income, assistance may not exceed 25 % of the eligible total volume. These rates can be supplemented by forms of financing other than direct aid for up to 10 % of the total eligible total.
  • Contributions to investments in businesses may not exceed 15 % of the total eligible volume. In the case of investments in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), these rates can be increased by up to 10 % of the eligible total volume for indirect forms of financing.

Objective 3

Objective 3

Outline of the Community (European Union) legislation about Objective 3

Topics

These categories group together and put in context the legislative and non-legislative initiatives which deal with the same topic.

Regional policy > Provisions and instruments of regional policy

Objective 3

The main goal of regional policy in the European Union is economic and social cohesion. This is based on financial solidarity, whereby more than 35% of the Union’s budget is transferred to the less-favoured regions (EUR 213 billion in 2000-06 plus EUR 21.74 billion for the ten new Member States). Those regions in the Union lagging behind in their development, undergoing restructuring or facing specific geographical, economic or social problems are to be put in a better position to cope with their difficulties and to benefit fully from the opportunities offered by the single market.

The amount of support that regions receive through the EU’s regional policy depends on their level of development and the type of difficulties they are facing. The Structural Fund regulations for 2000-06 provide, in particular, for three priority objectives:

  • : to promote the development and structural adjustment of regions whose development is lagging behind;
  • : to support the economic and social conversion of areas experiencing structural difficulties;
  • Objective 3: to support the adaptation and modernisation of education, training and employment policies and systems in regions not eligible under Objective 1.

This information sheet concerns Objective 3 only. The other Objectives are the subject of separate sheets.

GEOGRAPHICAL ELIGIBILITY

The reform of the Structural Funds under Agenda 2000 concentrates structural assistance on the most pressing development problems. The new Objective 3 of the Structural Funds for 2000-06 thus brings together the former Objectives 3 (combating long-term unemployment, integration of young people into working life, integration of those threatened with exclusion from the labour market) and Objective 4 (adapting the workforce to changes in production). It is the reference framework for all the measures taken under the new Title on employment inserted in the EC Treaty by the Treaty of Amsterdam and under the European employment strategy.

Objective 3 covers all activities relating to the development of human resources. Its goal is to modernise education and training policy and systems and promote employment.

All regions not covered by Objective 1 are eligible under Objective 3. Training and employment measures in Objective 1 regions are already included in programmes receiving assistance from the European Social Fund (ESF) to that end.

PROGRAMMING DOCUMENTS

Programming is an essential part of implementing EU regional policy. As a first step, the Member States submit development plans to the Commission. These include a precise description of the economic and social situation of the country by region, a description of the most appropriate strategy for achieving the stated development objectives and indications on the use and form of the financial contribution from the Structural Funds.

The plans submitted for financing under Objective 3 cover those parts a Member State not covered by Objective 1. They provide a framework for developing human resources throughout the country’s territory.

Next, the Member States submit their programming documents to the Commission. These documents cover the entire programming period (2000-06) and follow the Commission’s general guidelines. They can take the form of:

  • Community support frameworks (CSF) translated into Operational Programmes (OPs). Member States may use this formula for Objective 3 if they consider it necessary. CSFs and OPs describe the socio-economic context of the country and set out development priorities and goals to be achieved. They also lay down the arrangements for financial management, monitoring, evaluation and control. The OPs detail the various priorities of the CSF as they apply to a specific region or development priority. In the case of Objective 3, these priorities can relate to education and training, integration into working life, the spirit of enterprise, the health services and social exclusion.
    You can consult these documents on the Internet site of the Directorate-General for Employment and Social Affairs.
  • Single programming documents (SPDs). For Objective 3, the Commission recommends that the Member States draw up SPDs. These are single documents gathering together the data contained in a Community support framework and operational programme: the programme’s priorities, a short description of the proposed measures and an indicative financing plan.
    You can consult these single programming documents on the Internet site of the Directorate-General for Employment and Social Affairs.

In addition, in the context of the European employment strategy, the Member States also adopt annual employment guidelines setting out clear priorities and objectives for their employment policy in the coming year. Each Member State applies the guidelines through its national employment policy by means of national action plans (NAP). These national policies are the subject of ex-post checks and an annual evaluation by the Commission and the Member States.

FINANCIAL PROVISIONS

Funding

EUR 195 billion (commitments at 1999 prices) is allocated to the Structural Funds for 2000-06; in addition, EUR 14.15 billion is earmarked for the ten new Member States. The allocation for Objective 3 is EUR 24.05 billion over the seven years of the programming period (12.3% of the total) for the EU-15 plus EUR 110 million for the period from 1 May 2004 to 31 December 2006 for the new Member States (0.79% of the total) and is the sole responsibility of the ESF.

Commission Decision 1999/505/EC [C(1999) 1774: Official Journal L 194 of 27.7.1999] and the act concerning the conditions of accession to the EU of the ten new Member States fix an indicative allocation by Member State of the commitment appropriations for Objective 3 of the Structural Funds for 2000-06 as shown below.

Member State Objective 3
(million)
Germany 4 581
Austria 528
Belgium 737
Denmark 365
Spain 2 140
Finland 403
France 4 540
Italy 3 744
Luxembourg 38
Netherlands 1 686
United Kingdom 4 568
Sweden 720
EU-15 24 050
Czech Republic 52 2
Cyprus 19 5
Slovakia 39 9

Since their entire territory is covered by Objective 1, the other Member States are not concerned by Objective 3.

Contribution of the Funds

As a general rule, the contribution of the Structural Funds under Objective 3 is subject to the following ceilings: no more than 50% of the total eligible volume and at least 25% of eligible public expenditure. As only the ESF contributes to financing Objective 3, its contribution rates may be higher inside Objective 2 areas than outside them.

LEADER+

LEADER+

Outline of the Community (European Union) legislation about LEADER+

Topics

These categories group together and put in context the legislative and non-legislative initiatives which deal with the same topic.

Regional policy > Provisions and instruments of regional policy

LEADER+

The Community Initiative Leader+ is part of the Community’s rural development policy, the second pillar of the common agricultural policy (CAP). In the period 2000-06, it is geared to the diversification of economic activity in rural areas by applying innovative, integrated and participative territorial development strategies. This communication defines the Commission’s guidelines for Leader+, focusing on cooperation between territories and networking.

Document or Iniciative

Commission Communication of 14 April 2000 to the Member States laying down guidelines for the Community Initiative for Rural Development (Leader+) [See amending acts].

Summary

Changes in the agricultural sector as a result of the reform of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and the increasing demands of consumers, environmental pressure, the rapid spread of new technology, the ageing population and rural depopulation are all factors affecting the countryside today. Under the Community’s innovative rural development policy, rural areas have embarked on a debate on their socio-economic role and are making structural adjustments in order to meet these important challenges effectively.

As the second pillar of the CAP and a major factor in economic and social cohesion, the Community’s rural development policy is not restricted to boosting the competitiveness of agriculture. It also encourages the development of new activities and sources of employment. The Community Initiatives Leader I (1991-94) and Leader II (1994-99) also played an experimental role, which has made it possible to define and implement innovative, integrated and participative local schemes.

All those participating in the experiment had such a positive overall view of it that the Commission wished to proceed further along this road. It therefore included Leader+, the new Community Initiative for rural development, in the general rules on the Structural Funds for the 2000-06 programming period.

GENERAL PROVISIONS

Objectives

Drawing on the specific resources of rural areas as part of a development strategy which is relevant and tailored to the local circumstances seems increasingly to be the only way of adapting them to an ever-changing socio-economic context.

Leader I and II taught the following lessons:

  • Strengths: the mobilising of local actors to take control of the future of their area; decentralised, integrated and bottom-up approach to territorial development; the exchange and transfer of experience through the creation of networks; the ability to include small-scale projects and support small-scale promoters.
  • Weaknesses: delays in the selection of beneficiaries in some Member States, and consequently in the launching of programmes; fragile partnerships; the accumulation of disparate procedures and the dispersal of financial resources.

The Leader+ Initiative continues its role as a laboratory, which can encourage the emergence of new approaches to integrated and sustainable rural development. These approaches will complement national and European rural development policy in the context of the “mainstream” programmes, in particular under Objective 1, Objective 2 and Objective 3 of the Structural Funds.

The aim of Leader+ is thus to encourage rural actors to think about the longer-term potential of their area. The local actors implement the original strategy that they themselves have designed, experimenting with new ways of:

  • enhancing natural and cultural heritage,
  • reinforcing the economic environment in order to create jobs,
  • improving the organisational capabilities of their community.

Cooperation is a key component of Leader+, be it between different areas in the same Member State, between rural areas in several Member States and even beyond if necessary. Relevant new rural development models will be exploited and disseminated through a major networking exercise.

Financial provisions

The Community budget for Leader+ for 2000-06 is 2 020 million at 1999 prices under the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) Guidance Section.

Leader+ supports all measures eligible for financing by the EAGGF Guidance Section, the ERDF and the European Social Fund. All expenditure related to participating in the networks and running them, providing information, and managing, monitoring and evaluating the programme is eligible for part-financing. With the exception of small-scale projects, investments in infrastructure and productive investments of a unit cost higher than a certain ceiling are not eligible.

The rules on the rates of Community contribution laid down in the general Regulation of the Structural Funds apply. In particular, the maximum EAGGF Guidance Section contribution is 75% of the total eligible volume in the regions covered by Objective 1 and 50% in other areas.

SCOPE

Unlike Leader I and II, all rural areas are eligible under Leader+, in particular those which did not take part in the earlier Community Initiatives. In order to concentrate Community resources on the most promising proposals, Community funding under actions 1 and 2 is granted to a limited number of rural territories only. Accordingly, the national authorities must set up an open and rigorous procedure for selecting which rural areas may benefit under Leader+ through one (or more) national call(s) for proposals. Selection is based on general criteria laid down in the Commission’s guidelines and specific criteria taking account of both the specific situation of the rural areas concerned and the objectives that the Member States are seeking to attain through Leader+.

The rural areas designated do not necessarily coincide with national administrative boundaries or with zones established for the purpose of eligibility under Objectives 1 and 2 of the Structural Funds. These are small rural territories which form a homogeneous unit in geographical, economic and social terms and which have the resources needed to implement a development strategy. As a general rule, the population of the territories selected should not number less than 10 000 inhabitants, and not more than 100 000 in the most densely populated areas (around 120 inhabitants/km²). However, in some areas of northern Europe, properly justified exceptions to these criteria may be accepted.

BENEFICIARIES

The final beneficiaries of assistance under Leader+ are the local action groups (LAGs). These groups draw up the development strategy for their territory and are responsible for implementing it on the basis of a specific development plan.

The LAGs create an open local partnership which clearly allocates the powers and responsibilities to the different partners. They are made up of a balanced and representative selection of partners drawn from the different socio-economic sectors in the local area. The economic and social partners and non-profit (voluntary) associations must make up at least 50% of the local partnership.

The members of the LAGs must be locally based. They either select an administrative and financial head qualified to administer public funds, or come together in a legally-constituted common structure which fulfils the same function.

ACTIONS

Leader+ is structured around three actions:

  • Action 1: Support for integrated territorial rural development strategies of a pilot nature based on the bottom-up approach and horizontal partnerships;
  • Action 2: Support for inter-territorial and transnational cooperation;
  • Action 3: the networking of all rural areas in the Community, whether or not they are beneficiaries under Leader+, and all rural development actors.

Action 1: Integrated territorial rural development strategies of a pilot nature

This action provides support for rural areas which devise and implement an integrated and sustainable pilot development strategy. These territories present the national authorities with a development plan based on a representative partnership and structured around a strong theme typical of the identity of the territory concerned.

The development plans drawn up by the LAGs must take into account the following:

  • The strategy must encourage interaction between actors, sectors and projects built around a strong theme typical of the identity and/or resources and/or specific know-how of the area.
    The priority themes are: the use of new know-how and new technologies, improving the quality of life, making the best use of natural and cultural resources, including enhancing the value of sites of Community interest selected under ” Natura 2000 ” and, lastly, adding value to local products, in particular by facilitating access to markets for small production units via collective actions. Lastly, enhancing job opportunities and/or activities for women and young people is a Community priority.
  • The development strategy must demonstrate its roots in and relevance to the area, particularly in terms of socio-economic viability and sustainability.
  • The strategy must be demonstrably innovative and a pilot scheme.

    Original and ambitious approaches to rural development intended to take further the experiment started under Leader I and II. Strategies should explore innovative approaches to development which are new to the areas concerned and not yet attempted under the Leader method.
    The “pilot” nature of a strategy can be assessed in a variety of ways: the emergence of new products and services; the adoption of innovative methods for managing available resources; interaction between economic sectors which have traditionally been separate; development of original forms of organisation and involvement of the local population.
  • Strategies must complement the operations under the mainstream programmes.

Action 2: Support for cooperation between rural territories

Only the areas selected for Action 1 of Leader+ are eligible for Action 2, which supports cooperation between rural territories. Under Action 2, financial assistance covers both upstream expenditure on technical assistance to set up cooperation and the joint project proper.

Cooperation often enables rural territories to achieve the critical mass necessary for a joint project to be viable and encourage complementary actions between partners. It involves pooling know-how and/or human and financial resources which are usually dispersed across the territories. Two types of cooperation are possible:

  • Inter-territorial cooperation within the same Member State.
    While the cooperating territories are not necessarily beneficiaries under Leader+, the cooperation themes are primarily those defined in the development plans of the eligible territories.
  • Transnational cooperation between territories in several Member States.
    In addition to territories selected under Leader+, transnational cooperation is also open to territories that took part in Leader I and II or other rural territories organised in line with the Leader approach. While only Leader+ territories are eligible for Community part-financing, promotion expenditure is eligible for all the territories involved. Where a Leader+ territory develops a transnational cooperation project with a territory which is outside the European Union but is organised in line with the Leader approach, the relevant expenditure by that territory is also eligible.

Action 3: Networking

Exchanging know-how, experience and information on rural development successes is a priority of Leader+. Active participation in the network is therefore mandatory for beneficiaries under the Initiative.

The networking of all rural areas in the European Union, whether or not they are beneficiaries under Leader+, and all rural development actors, such as the rural information and promotion carrefours, which act as relays for information about the European Union located in rural areas, stimulates cooperation and the exchange of expertise.

Each Member State lays down the rules needed to set up a network organisation unit at national level. The job of this unit is to coordinate the network, identify, analyse and disseminate good practice, organise exchanges of experience and know-how for the benefit of less-advanced territories and provide technical assistance for local and transnational cooperation.

The Commission is setting up an Observatory of rural areas at European level, which may not cost more than 2% of the total budget for Leader+. The Observatory will be responsible for organising the network of rural territories at Community level, for the purpose of:

  • gathering and disseminating information on Community rural development measures and trends in rural areas throughout Europe,
  • collecting, consolidating and disseminating good practice in rural development at Community level,
  • organising meetings at Community level for beneficiaries under Leader+ and stimulating transnational cooperation,
  • assisting the national authorities in their coordinating role and facilitating cooperation,
  • drafting reports on the implementation of and lessons learned from Leader+.

IMPLEMENTATION

Leader+ Community Initiative programmes

The Commission makes an indicative financial allocation to each Member State (see the table at the end of this sheet). On this basis, the Member States consult the most representative partners at all the appropriate levels. The Member States then have six months following the publication of the Commission’s guidelines in the Official Journal in which to submit their Leader+ Community Initiative Programme (CIP) to the Commission. The Commission must approve these programmes within five months of receiving them, whereupon it adopts the contribution of the EAGGF Guidance Section. 56 programmes were approved in 2001, of which 11 were at national level and 45 regional. The 17 remaining programmes will be adopted during the first quarter of 2002 (see the summary table at the end of this sheet).

The Member States all opted to draw up Operational Programmes accompanied by a programming complement. In line with the results of the ex ante evaluation, all the CIPs deal with:

  • the strengths, weaknesses and potential of the territory;
  • the objectives sought and the strategy to attain them;
  • the criteria, procedure and timetable for selecting the LAGs.
    Member States must inform the Commission of the number of LAGs they intend to select by means of one or more calls for tender no later than two years after their programme is approved;
  • the method chosen for selecting transnational and inter-territorial cooperation projects;
  • a financing plan for each priority by year and by source of funding;
  • the provisions needed for implementation, economic and financial management, monitoring and checking operations on the ground and evaluation;
  • arrangements for informing the end beneficiaries and the general public;
  • the coherency and value-added of the proposed measures and the expected impact on the territories concerned.

Management, control, monitoring and evaluation

The parts of the general Regulation on the Structural Funds dealing with the management, control, monitoring and evaluation of assistance apply to the Leader+ Initiative.

In terms of financial management, programmes must clearly describe the management arrangements and the procedures for the mobilisation and circulation of financial flows, in particular of Community funds. Moreover, the procedures set up must ensure effective control of expenditure.

At the level of the LAGs, a monitoring committee monitors the operations using financial and structural indicators to analyse financial execution, the actual implementation of operations and their impact on the territory. The results are then transmitted to the European Observatory for processing and dissemination. At regional and national level, a steering committee must meet at least once a year to analyse the progress on implementing Leader+.

To find out about the Community Initiative Programmes at the relevant level in each Member State, please consult the pages on Leader+ on the Directorate-General for Agriculture’s website.

References

Act Entry into force Deadline for transposition in the Member States Official Journal
Commission communication of 14 April 2000 C 139 of 18.5.2000
Amending act(s) Entry into force Deadline for transposition in the Member States Official Journal
Commission communication C 262 of 31.10.2003
Commission communication C 294 of 4.12.2003

Related Acts

Commission Decision C (2000) 1220 of 12 May 2000 fixing an indicative allocation by Member State of the commitment appropriations under the Community Initiative Leader+ for the period 2000-06. The allocation is as follows:

Member State Amounts
(in million)
Belgium 15
Denmark 16
Germany 247
Greece 172
Spain 467
France 252
Ireland 45
Italy 267
Luxembourg 2
Netherlands 78
Austria 71
Portugal 152
Finland 52
Sweden 38
United Kingdom 106
European network 40
Total 2020

Commission Decisions approving the national/regional Community Initiative Programmes for Leader+:

Member State Decision
SPAIN 18 programmes
Andalusia C(2001) 2158 of 5.9.2001
Aragon C(2001) 2067 of 31.7.2001
Asturias C(2001) 2857 of 18.10.2001
Balearic Islands C(2001) 4206 of 17.12.2001
Catalonia C(2001) 2128 of 27.8.2001
Castile-León, C(2001) 2176 of 20.8.2001
Castile-La Mancha C(2001) 2066 of 31.7.2001
Canary Islands C(2001) 2177 of 20.8.2001
Cantabria C(2001) 2065 of 31.7.2001
Extremadura C(2001) 2159 of 5.9.2001
Galicia C(2001) 2179 of 20.8.2001
Madrid C(2001) 2068 of 31.7.2001
Murcia C(2001) 2183 of 23.8.2001
Navarre C(2001) 2184 of 23.8.2001
Basque Country C(2002) 210 of 8.2.2002
Rioja C(2001) 2178 of 20.8.2001
Valencia C(2001) 2761 of 1.10.2001
Network C(2001) 1245 of 18.5.2001
FRANCE 1 national programme: C(2001) 2094 of 7.8.2001
NETHERLANDS 4 programmes
North C(2001) 1298 of 31.7.2001
East C(2001) 1299 of 30.7.2001
West C(2001) 1297 of 30.7.2001
South C(2001) 1300 of 31.7.2001
ITALY 22 programmes
Abruzzo C(2001) 4207 of 17.12.2001
Basilicata C(2002)247 of 19.2.2002
Bolzano C(2001) 2743 of 25.09.2001
Calabria C(2002) 246 of 19.2.2002
Campania C(2002) 168 of 29.1.2002
Emilia-Romagna C(2001) 3561 of 19.11.2001
Friuli-Venezia Giulia C(2001) 3563 of 19.11.2001
Lazio C(2001) 3626 of 26.11.2001
Liguria C(2001) 3559 of 19.11.2001
Lombardy C(2001) 3560 of 19.11.2001
Marche C(2001) 4144 of 13.12.2001
Molise C(2002) 250 of 19.2.2002
Piedmont C(2001) 3558 of 19.11.2001
Apulia C(2002) 171 of 29.1.2002
Sardinia C(2002) 248 of 19.2.2002
Sicily C(2002) 249 of 19.2.2001
Tuscany C(2001) 4012 of 3.12.2001
Trentino C(2001) 3490 of 7.11.2001
Umbria C(2001) 3489 of 7.11.2001
Valle d’Aosta C(2001) 2744 of 25.09.2001
Veneto C(2001) 3564 of 19.11.2001
Network C(2002) 251 of 19.2.2002
GERMANY 14 programmes
Baden-Württemberg C(2002) 110 of 12.3.2002
Bavaria C(2001) 1314 of 17.12.2001
Brandenburg C(2002) 1308 of 9.1.2002
Hessen C(2002) 108 of 22.3.2002
Mecklenburg-Vorpommern C(2002) 109 of 13.2.2002
Lower Saxony C(2001) 1312 of 17.12.2001
North Rhine -Westphalia C(2001) 1305 of 22.11.2001
Rhineland-Palatinate C(2002) 107 of 30.1.2002
Saxony C(2002) 106 of 29.1.2002
Schleswing-Holstein C(2001) 1306 of 29.11.2001
Saarland C(2002) 4699 of 19.12.2002
Saxony-Anhalt C(2001) 1303 of 3.12.2001
Thuringia C(2001) 1311 of 17.12.2001
Network C(2001) 1304 of 22.11.2001
DENMARK 1 programme
C(2001) 2129 of 27.08.2001
UNITED KINGDOM 4 programmes
England C(2001) 2100 of 9.8.2001
Wales C(2001) 1379 of 2.7.2001
Northern Ireland C(2001) 2741 of 21.9.2001
Scotland C(2002) 37 of 8.1.2002
BELGIUM 2 programmes
Flanders C(2001) 4738 of 20.12.2001
Wallonia C(2001) 4202 of 17.12.2001
LUXEMBOURG 1 programme
C(2001) 1315 of 13.12.2001
FINLAND 1 programme
C(2001) 785 of 22.3.2001
SWEDEN 1 programme
C(2001) 1383 of 3.7.2001
PORTUGAL 1 programme
C(2001) 3148 of 25.7.2001
GREECE 1 programme
C(2001) 3562 of 19.11.2001
IRELAND 1 programme
C(2001) 1296 of 3.7.2001

URBAN II

URBAN II

Outline of the Community (European Union) legislation about URBAN II

Topics

These categories group together and put in context the legislative and non-legislative initiatives which deal with the same topic.

Employment and social policy > Social inclusion and the fight against poverty

URBAN II

1) Objective

To lay down Commission guidelines on the economic and social regeneration of cities and neighbourhoods in crisis in order to promote sustainable urban development.

2) Document or Iniciative

Commission Communication of 28 April 2000 to the Member States laying down guidelines for a Community initiative concerning economic and social regeneration of cities and of neighbourhoods in crisis in order to promote sustainable urban development Urban II [C(2000) 1100 – Official Journal C 141 of 19.05.2000].

3) Summary

Almost 80 % of the European Community’s citizens today live in cities. As centres of cultural, political, social and economic exchange and development, towns and cities play a crucial role in Europe. Accordingly, urban issues are at the heart of the Community’s policies. This can be clearly seen in the Commission’s guidelines on the programming of mainstream Structural Fund assistance (Objective 1, Objective 2, Objective 3)

The Urban Community Initiative, first launched in 1994, encourages urban areas and neighbourhoods in crisis to design innovative, integrated urban development measures. The fruits of these measures are now beginning to be seen in the areas concerned: the quality of life is improving and local stakeholders agree on the importance of the integrated Urban approach. Thus, during the 1994-99 programming period, the Urban Community Initiative provided funding for 118 urban areas, amounting to EUR 900 million and directly benefiting 3.2 million people.

Between 1989 and 1999, the innovative actions of the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) encouraged urban development and experimentation with new forms of economic, social and environmental development, with encouraging results. EUR 164 million funded 59 urban pilot projects (UPP).

Encouraged by these positive experiences, the Commission decided to continue this approach. Broadly speaking, it wished to see greater account taken of urban issues in all the Community’s policies. In particular, it introduced Urban II, the new Community initiative for sustainable urban development, in the general regulation on the Structural Funds.

Urban II is jointly financed by the Commission and the Member States. For 2000-06, the Community’s contribution to the initiative amounts to EUR 730 million, exclusively from the ERDF, for a total investment of EUR 1.6 billion, covering a population of some 2.2 million. Community financing can fund up to 75 % of the total eligible cost in urban areas covered by Objective 1 and 50 % elsewhere.

Objectives

The Urban II Community initiative offers added value to mainstream programmes. It is important to stress the innovative nature of the operations involved, which start life as demonstrative, flagship actions before gradually being incorporated into the mainstream programmes.

The objectives of the new Community initiative are:

  • to formulate and implement innovative strategies for sustainable economic and social regeneration of small and medium-sized towns and cites or of distressed urban neighbourhoods in larger cities;
  • to enhance and exchange knowledge and experience in relation to sustainable urban regeneration and development in the areas concerned.

In order to fulfil these objectives, the urban regeneration strategies must adhere to the following principles:

  • sufficient critical mass of population and associated support structures to facilitate the formulation and implementation of innovative urban development programmes;
  • strong local partnership to define challenges, strategy and priorities, allocate resources and monitor and evaluate the strategy. Partnerships are wide and include economic and social partners, non-governmental organisations and residents’ groupings;
  • an integrated territorial approach linked to development strategies for the wider urban area or region;
  • integration of the economic, social and environmental, security and transport aspects, including equality of access to education and training opportunities;
  • promotion of equal opportunities between men and women;
  • complementarity with the main forms of assistance under the Structural Funds and other Community initiatives (Interreg III, Leader+, Equal).

Eligible areas

Urban II is providing support for 70 urban areas. The population in each area should be around 20 000 people, but may be as few as 10 000 in some cases.

To be eligible, each city, town or urban neighbourhood must be a coherent geographical or socio-economic entity. These areas are in a situation of urban crisis or in need of economic and social regeneration. Located either within or outside areas eligible for support under Objectives 1 and 2 of the Structural Funds, they must meet at least three of the following conditions:

  • a low level of economic activity and a specific need for conversion due to local economic and social difficulties;
  • a high level of long-term unemployment, poverty and exclusion;
  • a low level of education, significant skills deficiencies and high drop-out-rates from school;
  • a high number of immigrants, ethnic and minority groups, or refugees;
  • a high level of criminality and delinquency;
  • precarious demographic trends;
  • a particularly degraded environment.

On the basis of indicative financial allocations, and an indicative number of urban areas per Member State and a minimum level of expenditure (EUR 500 per inhabitant), the Member States identify the urban areas wishing to participate in Urban II. Each area selected defines a development strategy which it works out in a Community Initiative Programme (CIP). This document becomes the basis for negotiating financial assistance from the Commission and serves to implement the innovative urban development strategy on the ground.

Priority activities

The strategies develop high impact operations which must maximise the visibility of the selected areas both within Member States and at Community level. They also show commitment to organisational change in urban governance by means of increased delegation of powers and participation by all stakeholders. Strategies also have the following priorities:

  • mixed use redevelopment of brownfield sites: protection and restoration of buildings and public spaces, reclamation of derelict sites and contaminated land; preservation and enhancement of historic, cultural and environmental heritage; creation of lasting jobs; integration of local communities and ethnic minorities; reintegration of excluded persons; improved security and prevention of delinquency; improved street lighting, closed circuit TV surveillance; reduced pressures on greenfield sites.
    The ERDF cannot finance housing. However, the CIPs can still help, with support from national and/or local authorities for housing improvement when housing is part of the urban crisis;
  • entrepreneurship, employment pacts and local employment initiatives: support and services for small and medium-sized enterprises, commerce, cooperatives and mutual associations; creation of business centres, technology transfer facilities; training for new technologies; encouraging entrepreneurship; environmental protection; provision of cultural, leisure and sports amenities; nursery and crèche facilities; alternative care facilities and other services namely for elderly people and children; promotion of equal opportunities between men and women;
  • the development of an anti-exclusion and anti-discrimination strategy through actions furthering equal opportunities and targeting notably women, immigrants and refugees: counselling, training schemes and language training oriented to the specific needs of minorities and disadvantaged and marginalised people; mobile units for employment and training advice; improved health services and drug rehabilitation centres; investment in education and health facilities;
  • development of more effective, economically efficient and environmentally friendly integrated public transport systems: safer, more integrated and more intelligent public transport; public transport links to concentrations of activity and jobs; telematic services for travel information, reservation and payment; clean and energy-efficient vehicles; provision for cycling and walking; training for transport staff;
  • environmental measures: minimising and treatment of waste, total recycling, selective collecting and treatment; air quality analysis; efficient water management; noise reduction; reduction in consumption of fossil fuels through use of renewable energy sources; training in environmental management and protection;
  • development of the potential of information society technologies targeting small and medium-sized enterprises and citizens: better access to services of public interest, education, culture and other telematic neighbourhood services; training and installation of facilities to allow teleworking; information systems for the management of human resources and health services; assistance to adapt to the labour market; supporting local authorities for the transfer of know-how and technology;
  • promoting the notion of “urban governance”: studies and expertise on the reorganisation and improvement of public services; design and introduction of new urban management structures; introduction of indicators for evaluating the sustainability of local management; information campaigns and improved access to information for citizens; measures to involve citizens in the political decision-making process; exchanges of experiences and good practice; development of the European Union database on good practice in urban management.

Exchanging experience and good practice with regard to urban development and the economic and social regeneration of urban areas is a key component of the Urban II Community Initiative. This exchange of information will be facilitated by developing methods for quantification and appropriate performance indicators, which could be inspired by the Urban Audit. A maximum amount of EUR 15 million is earmarked for developing networks to this end. Other technical assistance measures can be planned at the initiative of the Commission or the Member States. The funds committed for exchange of experience and good practice and technical assistance may amount to no more than 2 % of the total ERDF contribution.

Community Initiative programmes

The local authorities of the eligible areas, where necessary in collaboration with the regional and national authorities, draw up a Community Initiative programme (CIP) to implement an innovative urban development strategy. Each programme concerns a coherent geographical and socio-economic urban area. In some cases, it may even concern several urban areas, each of which covers at least 10 000 hectares and belongs to the same territorial context.

All the general rules laid down in the general Regulation on the Structural Funds apply to CIPs. Their content is similar to that of the single programming documents (SPDs) and includes:

  • an ex ante evaluation analysing the strengths and weaknesses of the area concerned;
  • a description of the programming process and the arrangements made to consult the partners;
  • a statement of the strategy and priorities for the development of the urban area in accordance with the general Community guidelines;
  • a summary description of the measures planned to implement the priorities and required to prepare, monitor and evaluate the CIP;
  • an indicative financing plan for each priority and each year;
  • the provisions for implementing the CIP: the authorities and structures set up (managing authority, monitoring committee and, where applicable, paying authority and steering committee); arrangements for managing the CIP (calls for proposals, selection of operations); arrangements for financial control, monitoring, checks and evaluation.

The selected authorities must present their Community Initiative programmes to the Commission within six months following the publication of the Communication. Within three months of the approval of the programmes, a programming complement must be sent to the Commission, unless the Member State opts to apply for a global Community grant.

Monitoring, implementation and evaluation of interventions

The managing authority is responsible for organising the preparation of decisions to be taken by the monitoring committee and, where the steering committee. In particular, it accepts, considers and gives a preliminary assessment of operations proposed for financing or coordinates such tasks.

The monitoring committee, which meets at least once each year, is made up of representatives of the local, and possibly also the national and regional, authorities, the economic and social partners and non-governmental organisations. The committee is responsible, in particular, for monitoring and evaluating the programme and making changes to it.

For more information, please see the specific page dedicated to the Urban II Community Initiative on the Internet site of the Directorate-General for Regional Policy.

4) Implementing Measures

Initially, the Commission had planned to support some 50 urban areas, but in the end 70 were selected. For more information, please see the press releases covering the approvals of all the programmes.

5) Follow-Up Work

Commission Communication of 14.06.2002 to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on “The programming of the Structural Funds 2000-2006: An initial assessment of the Urban Initiative” [COM(2002)308 final – Not published in the Official Journal].

Urban issues are assuming increasing political importance in the European Union. The Urban approach teaches a number of lessons for the future of European policy: an integrated approach, focusing on relatively small areas, with some flexibility in the selection of areas according to national requirements and priorities, with simplified and flexible administration and local partnership.


Another Normative about URBAN II

Topics

These categories group together and put in context the legislative and non-legislative initiatives which deal with the same topic

Regional policy > Provisions and instruments of regional policy

URBAN II

1) Objective

To lay down Commission guidelines on the economic and social regeneration of cities and neighbourhoods in crisis in order to promote sustainable urban development.

2) Document or Iniciative

Commission Communication of 28 April 2000 to the Member States laying down guidelines for a Community initiative concerning economic and social regeneration of cities and of neighbourhoods in crisis in order to promote sustainable urban development Urban II [C(2000) 1100 – Official Journal C 141 of 19.05.2000].

3) Summary

Almost 80 % of the European Community’s citizens today live in cities. As centres of cultural, political, social and economic exchange and development, towns and cities play a crucial role in Europe. Accordingly, urban issues are at the heart of the Community’s policies. This can be clearly seen in the Commission’s guidelines on the programming of mainstream Structural Fund assistance (Objective 1, Objective 2, Objective 3)

The Urban Community Initiative, first launched in 1994, encourages urban areas and neighbourhoods in crisis to design innovative, integrated urban development measures. The fruits of these measures are now beginning to be seen in the areas concerned: the quality of life is improving and local stakeholders agree on the importance of the integrated Urban approach. Thus, during the 1994-99 programming period, the Urban Community Initiative provided funding for 118 urban areas, amounting to EUR 900 million and directly benefiting 3.2 million people.

Between 1989 and 1999, the innovative actions of the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) encouraged urban development and experimentation with new forms of economic, social and environmental development, with encouraging results. EUR 164 million funded 59 urban pilot projects (UPP).

Encouraged by these positive experiences, the Commission decided to continue this approach. Broadly speaking, it wished to see greater account taken of urban issues in all the Community’s policies. In particular, it introduced Urban II, the new Community initiative for sustainable urban development, in the general regulation on the Structural Funds.

Urban II is jointly financed by the Commission and the Member States. For 2000-06, the Community’s contribution to the initiative amounts to EUR 730 million, exclusively from the ERDF, for a total investment of EUR 1.6 billion, covering a population of some 2.2 million. Community financing can fund up to 75 % of the total eligible cost in urban areas covered by Objective 1 and 50 % elsewhere.

Objectives

The Urban II Community initiative offers added value to mainstream programmes. It is important to stress the innovative nature of the operations involved, which start life as demonstrative, flagship actions before gradually being incorporated into the mainstream programmes.

The objectives of the new Community initiative are:

  • to formulate and implement innovative strategies for sustainable economic and social regeneration of small and medium-sized towns and cites or of distressed urban neighbourhoods in larger cities;
  • to enhance and exchange knowledge and experience in relation to sustainable urban regeneration and development in the areas concerned.

In order to fulfil these objectives, the urban regeneration strategies must adhere to the following principles:

  • sufficient critical mass of population and associated support structures to facilitate the formulation and implementation of innovative urban development programmes;
  • strong local partnership to define challenges, strategy and priorities, allocate resources and monitor and evaluate the strategy. Partnerships are wide and include economic and social partners, non-governmental organisations and residents’ groupings;
  • an integrated territorial approach linked to development strategies for the wider urban area or region;
  • integration of the economic, social and environmental, security and transport aspects, including equality of access to education and training opportunities;
  • promotion of equal opportunities between men and women;
  • complementarity with the main forms of assistance under the Structural Funds and other Community initiatives (Interreg III, Leader+, Equal).

Eligible areas

Urban II is providing support for 70 urban areas. The population in each area should be around 20 000 people, but may be as few as 10 000 in some cases.

To be eligible, each city, town or urban neighbourhood must be a coherent geographical or socio-economic entity. These areas are in a situation of urban crisis or in need of economic and social regeneration. Located either within or outside areas eligible for support under Objectives 1 and 2 of the Structural Funds, they must meet at least three of the following conditions:

  • a low level of economic activity and a specific need for conversion due to local economic and social difficulties;
  • a high level of long-term unemployment, poverty and exclusion;
  • a low level of education, significant skills deficiencies and high drop-out-rates from school;
  • a high number of immigrants, ethnic and minority groups, or refugees;
  • a high level of criminality and delinquency;
  • precarious demographic trends;
  • a particularly degraded environment.

On the basis of indicative financial allocations, and an indicative number of urban areas per Member State and a minimum level of expenditure (EUR 500 per inhabitant), the Member States identify the urban areas wishing to participate in Urban II. Each area selected defines a development strategy which it works out in a Community Initiative Programme (CIP). This document becomes the basis for negotiating financial assistance from the Commission and serves to implement the innovative urban development strategy on the ground.

Priority activities

The strategies develop high impact operations which must maximise the visibility of the selected areas both within Member States and at Community level. They also show commitment to organisational change in urban governance by means of increased delegation of powers and participation by all stakeholders. Strategies also have the following priorities:

  • mixed use redevelopment of brownfield sites: protection and restoration of buildings and public spaces, reclamation of derelict sites and contaminated land; preservation and enhancement of historic, cultural and environmental heritage; creation of lasting jobs; integration of local communities and ethnic minorities; reintegration of excluded persons; improved security and prevention of delinquency; improved street lighting, closed circuit TV surveillance; reduced pressures on greenfield sites.
    The ERDF cannot finance housing. However, the CIPs can still help, with support from national and/or local authorities for housing improvement when housing is part of the urban crisis;
  • entrepreneurship, employment pacts and local employment initiatives: support and services for small and medium-sized enterprises, commerce, cooperatives and mutual associations; creation of business centres, technology transfer facilities; training for new technologies; encouraging entrepreneurship; environmental protection; provision of cultural, leisure and sports amenities; nursery and crèche facilities; alternative care facilities and other services namely for elderly people and children; promotion of equal opportunities between men and women;
  • the development of an anti-exclusion and anti-discrimination strategy through actions furthering equal opportunities and targeting notably women, immigrants and refugees: counselling, training schemes and language training oriented to the specific needs of minorities and disadvantaged and marginalised people; mobile units for employment and training advice; improved health services and drug rehabilitation centres; investment in education and health facilities;
  • development of more effective, economically efficient and environmentally friendly integrated public transport systems: safer, more integrated and more intelligent public transport; public transport links to concentrations of activity and jobs; telematic services for travel information, reservation and payment; clean and energy-efficient vehicles; provision for cycling and walking; training for transport staff;
  • environmental measures: minimising and treatment of waste, total recycling, selective collecting and treatment; air quality analysis; efficient water management; noise reduction; reduction in consumption of fossil fuels through use of renewable energy sources; training in environmental management and protection;
  • development of the potential of information society technologies targeting small and medium-sized enterprises and citizens: better access to services of public interest, education, culture and other telematic neighbourhood services; training and installation of facilities to allow teleworking; information systems for the management of human resources and health services; assistance to adapt to the labour market; supporting local authorities for the transfer of know-how and technology;
  • promoting the notion of “urban governance”: studies and expertise on the reorganisation and improvement of public services; design and introduction of new urban management structures; introduction of indicators for evaluating the sustainability of local management; information campaigns and improved access to information for citizens; measures to involve citizens in the political decision-making process; exchanges of experiences and good practice; development of the European Union database on good practice in urban management.

Exchanging experience and good practice with regard to urban development and the economic and social regeneration of urban areas is a key component of the Urban II Community Initiative. This exchange of information will be facilitated by developing methods for quantification and appropriate performance indicators, which could be inspired by the Urban Audit. A maximum amount of EUR 15 million is earmarked for developing networks to this end. Other technical assistance measures can be planned at the initiative of the Commission or the Member States. The funds committed for exchange of experience and good practice and technical assistance may amount to no more than 2 % of the total ERDF contribution.

Community Initiative programmes

The local authorities of the eligible areas, where necessary in collaboration with the regional and national authorities, draw up a Community Initiative programme (CIP) to implement an innovative urban development strategy. Each programme concerns a coherent geographical and socio-economic urban area. In some cases, it may even concern several urban areas, each of which covers at least 10 000 hectares and belongs to the same territorial context.

All the general rules laid down in the general Regulation on the Structural Funds apply to CIPs. Their content is similar to that of the single programming documents (SPDs) and includes:

  • an ex ante evaluation analysing the strengths and weaknesses of the area concerned;
  • a description of the programming process and the arrangements made to consult the partners;
  • a statement of the strategy and priorities for the development of the urban area in accordance with the general Community guidelines;
  • a summary description of the measures planned to implement the priorities and required to prepare, monitor and evaluate the CIP;
  • an indicative financing plan for each priority and each year;
  • the provisions for implementing the CIP: the authorities and structures set up (managing authority, monitoring committee and, where applicable, paying authority and steering committee); arrangements for managing the CIP (calls for proposals, selection of operations); arrangements for financial control, monitoring, checks and evaluation.

The selected authorities must present their Community Initiative programmes to the Commission within six months following the publication of the Communication. Within three months of the approval of the programmes, a programming complement must be sent to the Commission, unless the Member State opts to apply for a global Community grant.

Monitoring, implementation and evaluation of interventions

The managing authority is responsible for organising the preparation of decisions to be taken by the monitoring committee and, where the steering committee. In particular, it accepts, considers and gives a preliminary assessment of operations proposed for financing or coordinates such tasks.

The monitoring committee, which meets at least once each year, is made up of representatives of the local, and possibly also the national and regional, authorities, the economic and social partners and non-governmental organisations. The committee is responsible, in particular, for monitoring and evaluating the programme and making changes to it.

For more information, please see the specific page dedicated to the Urban II Community Initiative on the Internet site of the Directorate-General for Regional Policy.

4) Implementing Measures

Initially, the Commission had planned to support some 50 urban areas, but in the end 70 were selected. For more information, please see the press releases covering the approvals of all the programmes.

5) Follow-Up Work

Commission Communication of 14.06.2002 to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on “The programming of the Structural Funds 2000-2006: An initial assessment of the Urban Initiative” [COM(2002)308 final – Not published in the Official Journal].

Urban issues are assuming increasing political importance in the European Union. The Urban approach teaches a number of lessons for the future of European policy: an integrated approach, focusing on relatively small areas, with some flexibility in the selection of areas according to national requirements and priorities, with simplified and flexible administration and local partnership.