Category Archives: Single Market for Services

Services account for more than 70 % of the economic activity of the Member States and a similar proportion of employment. The freedom to provide services and freedom of establishment, as set out in Articles 49 and 56 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), are therefore essential to the smooth operation of the internal market. In this way, economic operators can pursue a stable, continuous activity in one or more Member States and/or offer temporary services in another Member State without having to be established there. The European Union is therefore working towards providing frameworks for these two principles in order to guarantee the smooth functioning of the single market for services, and especially cross-border services. The EU has achieved significant progress in the area of certain services. Moreover, in 2006 it adopted the “Services” Directive which aims at removing barriers to trade and services, and at facilitating cross-border operations.

Internal Market

Internal Market

Internal Market Contents

  • Internal market: general framework
  • Living and working in the internal market: Free movement of people, asylum and immigration, free movement of workers
  • Single Market for Goods: Free movement of goods, technical harmonisation, product labelling and packaging, consumer safety, pharmaceutical and cosmetic products, chemical products, motor vehicles, construction, external dimension
  • Single market for services: Free movement of services, professional occupations, services of general interest, transport, Information Society, postal services, financial services, banks, insurance, securities markets
  • Single market for capital: Free movement of capital, economic and monetary union, economic and private stakeholders, fiscal aspects, combating fraud, external relations
  • Businesses in the internal market: Company law, public procurement, intellectual property

See also

Living and working in the internal market.
Overviews of European Union: Internal market.
Further information: the Internal Market and Services Directorate-General of the European Commission.

Single Market for Services

Single Market for Services

Outline of the Community (European Union) legislation about Single market for services

Topics

These categories group together and put in context the legislative and non-legislative initiatives which deal with the same topic.

Internal market > Single market for services

Single market for services

Services account for more than 70 % of the economic activity of the Member States and a similar proportion of employment. The freedom to provide services and freedom of establishment, as set out in Articles 49 and 56 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), are therefore essential to the smooth operation of the internal market. In this way, economic operators can pursue a stable, continuous activity in one or more Member States and/or offer temporary services in another Member State without having to be established there.

The European Union is therefore working towards providing frameworks for these two principles in order to guarantee the smooth functioning of the single market for services, and especially cross-border services. The EU has achieved significant progress in the area of certain services. Moreover, in 2006 it adopted the “Services” Directive which aims at removing barriers to trade and services, and at facilitating cross-border operations.

Single market for services Contents

  • Financial services: general framework
  • Financial services: banking
  • Financial services: insurance
  • Financial services: transactions in securities

GENERAL POLICIES

  • ‘Services’ Directive
  • Posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services
  • The principle of equal treatment for men and women outside the labour market
  • The competitiveness of business-related services
  • System for the recognition of professional qualifications

SECTORAL PROVISIONS

Liberal professions

  • Competition in professional services

Services of general interest

  • Reform of the EU State aid rules on Services of General Economic Interest
  • New European commitment for services of general interest
  • White Paper on services of general interest
  • Social services of general interest

Road transport

  • Common rules for access to the international road haulage market
  • Common rules for access to the international market for coach and bus services
  • Goods: Non-resident carriers in the national market

Marine transport

  • Freedom to supply services, competition, unfair pricing practices and free access to ocean trade
  • Freedom to provide services within the Member States (ocean trade)
  • Freedom to provide maritime transport services
  • Inland navigation: non-resident carriers
  • Inland navigation: transport of goods or passengers by inland waterway between Member States

Air transport

  • Air service agreements between Member States and third countries

Information society

  • Legal aspects of electronic commerce (“Directive on electronic commerce”)
  • A new framework for electronic communications services
  • Regulatory framework for electronic communications
  • Authorisation of electronic communications networks and services
  • Universal service and users’ rights
  • Access to electronic communications networks
  • Data protection in the electronic communications sector
  • Online gambling (Green Paper)

Postal services

  • The Establishment of an Internal Postal Market

The Establishment of an Internal Postal Market

The Establishment of an Internal Postal Market

Outline of the Community (European Union) legislation about The Establishment of an Internal Postal Market

Topics

These categories group together and put in context the legislative and non-legislative initiatives which deal with the same topic.

Internal market > Single market for services

The Establishment of an Internal Postal Market

Document or Iniciative

Directive 2008/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 Februray 2008 amending Directive 97/67/EC with regard to the full accomplishment of the internal market of Community postal services [See amending acts].

Summary

Background

The Community framework for EU postal services is set out in Directive 97/67/EC, as amended by Directive 2002/39/EC and by Directive 2008/6/EC, which provide the final step in the EU postal reform, which was initiated in 1992 by a green paper. Directive 97/67/EC initiated the liberalisation process which was deepened with Directive 2002/39/EC and further gradual market opening.

This directive established a timetable for progressive liberalisation in two stages: 1 January 2003 for letters weighing less than 100 g (or for which the postage cost is over three times that of a standard letter), and 1 January 2006 for letters weighing less than 50 g (or for which the postage cost is over two and a half times that of a standard letter).

Directive 2008/6/EC sets a deadline for the full market opening by 31 December 2010 for the majority of Member States (95 % of the EU postal market in terms of volume) and by 31 December 2012 for the remaining Member States.

Universal service obligation

Member States must ensure that users enjoy the right to a universal service involving the permanent provision of a postal service of specified quality at all points in their territory at affordable prices for all users.
To this end, Member States must ensure that the density of the points of contact and of the access points takes account of the needs of users, and that the universal service is guaranteed at least five working days a week, at least one clearance and one delivery to home or business premises. (Article 3).

Each Member State must guarantee the provision of the universal service and shall notify the Commission of the steps it has taken to fulfil this obligation. Member States may designate one or more undertakings as universal service providers to cover the entire national territory, subject to a periodic review (Article 4). . Each Member State shall determine and publish the rights and obligations assigned to the universal service provider(s) in accordance with Community law and shall disclose the identity of the universal service provider(s) to the European Commission.

Each Member State must ensure that universal service provision meets the following requirements (Article 5):

  • it shall offer a service guaranteeing compliance with the essential requirement;
  • it shall offer an identical service to users under comparable condition;
  • it shall be made available without any form of discrimination whatsoever, especially without discrimination arising from political, religious or ideological consideration;
  • it shall not be interrupted or stopped except in cases of force majeur;
  • it shall evolve in response to the technical, economic and social developments and to the needs of users.

Each Member State must ensure that users and postal service providers are regularly given sufficiently detailed and up-to-date information by the universal service provider(s) regarding the particular features of the universal services offered (Article 6).

Safeguarding the provision of universal postal service

Directive 2008/6/EC provides the last legislative step in the gradual market opening by making it compulsory for Member States not to grant or maintain in force any exclusive or special rights for the establishment and provision of postal services.

If universal provider(s) claim and prove that the provision of universal postal service entails an unfair financial burden, Directive 2008/6/EC envisages compensation from Member States such as public procurement procedures, public funding or a shared mechanism between providers of services and/or users or any other means compatible with the Treaty.

Any claimed unfair financial burden needs to be assessed and approved by the independent national regulatory authority (Article 7).

Provision of postal services and licensing regimes

For postal services which are within the scope of the universal service, Member States may introduce authorisation procedures, including individual licences, in order to guarantee compliance with the essential requirements and to ensure the provision of the universal service.

For postal services which are outside the scope of the universal service, Member States may introduce general authorisations to guarantee compliance with the essential requirements.

All licensing procedures, obligations and requirements relating to postal services providers shall be transparent, accessible, non-discriminatory, proportionate, precise and unambiguous, made public in advance and based on objective criteria (Article 9).

Fees and transparency of accounts

Member States ensure that the fees for each of the services forming part of the provision of the universal service comply with the following principles:

  • prices shall be affordable and must be such that all users, independent of geographical location, and, in the light of specific national conditions, have access to the service;
  • prices shall be cost-oriented and give incentives for an efficient universal service provision;
  • the application of a uniform fee shall not exclude the right of the universal service provider(s) to conclude individual price agreements with user;
  • fees shall be transparent and non-discriminator;
  • whenever universal service providers apply special fees, they shall apply the prinicples of transparency and non-discrimination with regard to both the fees and the associated conditions (Article 12).

In order to ensure the cross-border provision of the universal service, Member States must encourage their universal service providers to observe the following principles in their agreements on terminal dues for intra-Community cross-border mail:

  • terminal dues must be fixed in relation to the costs of processing and delivering incoming cross-border mail;
  • levels of remuneration must be related to the quality of service;
  • terminal dues must be transparent and non-discriminatory (Article 13).

The universal service provider(s) shall keep separate accounts within their internal accounting systems in order to clearly distinguish between each of the services and products which are part of the universal service and those which are not. Such internal accounting systems shall operate on the basis of consistently applied and objectively justifiable cost accounting principles.

National regulatory authorities shall ensure that the cost-accounting system used is verified by a competent, independent body (Article 14).

Quality of service

Member States shall ensure that service standards in relation to universal service are set and published in order to guarantee a postal service of good quality.


In particular, quality standards shall focus, on routing times and on the regularity and reliability of services (Article 16).

Quality standards for intra-Community cross-border services (laid down in the Annex II to the directive) must be as follows: D + 3 for 85 % of postal items of the fastest standard category, and D + 5 for 97 % of these items. D represents the date of deposit and n the number of working days between the posting and the delivery.


Member States must lay down quality standards for national mail and must ensure that they are compatible with those laid down for intra-Community cross-border services.
Member States must notify their quality standards for national services to the Commission, which will publish them in the same manner as the standards for intra-Community cross-border services (Articles 17 and 18).

Member States shall ensure that transparent, simple and inexpensive complaint procedures are put in place by all postal service providers.

Member States shall ensure that these procedures enable disputes to be settled fairly and promptly. Member States shall also encourage the development of independent out-of-court schemes for the resolution of disputes between postal service providers and users (Article 19).

The harmonisation of technical standards must be continued, taking into account in particular the interests of users. The European Committee for Standardisation will be entrusted with drawing up technical standards applicable in the postal sector on the basis of remits to it pursuant to Directive 83/189/EEC laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations (Article 20).

The European Commission and national regulatory authorities

The Commission will be assisted by a committee (Article 21).

Each Member State must designate one or more national regulatory authorities for the postal sector that are legally separate from and operationally independent of the postal operators. Member States that retain ownership or control of postal service providers shall ensure effective structural separation of the regulatory functions from activities associated with ownership of control.

Member States must inform the Commission which national regulatory authorities they have designated to carry out the tasks arising from this directive (Article 22).

Provision of information

Member States shall ensure that postal service providers provide all the financial information and information concerning the provision of the universal service necessary for: national regulatory authorities to ensure conformity with the provision of, or decisions made in accordance with this Directive; clearly defined statistical purposes (Article 22a).

Reporting on developments in the internal postal market

Every four years, no later than 31 December 2013, the Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the application of this directive.

Implementation date

Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this directive by 31 December 2010 at the latest.

By derogation to the abovementioned obligation, the following Member States decided to invoke the right to postpone the implementation of Directive 2008/6/EC until 31 December 2012 at the latest.

REFERENCES

Act Entry into force Deadline for transposition in the Member States Official Journal
Directive 97/67/EC [adoption: codecision COD/1995/0221]

10.2.1998

9.2.1999

OJ L 15 of 21.1.1998

Amending act(s) Entry into force Deadline for transposition in the Member States Official Journal

Directive 2002/39/EC

5.7.2002

31.12.2002

OJ L 15 of 5.7.2002

Directive 2008/6/EC

27.2.2008

31.12.2010/31.12.2012

OJ L 52 of 28.2.2008

Regulation (EC) No 1882/2003

20.11.2003

OJ L 284 of 31.10.2003

RELATED ACTS

Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council of 22 December 2008 on the application of the Postal Directive (Directive 97/67/EC as amended by Directive 2002/39/EC) [COM(2008) 884 final – not published in the OJ].
The fourth application report provides a comprehensive assessment of the overall transposition of the postal directive in Member States, including the application of key elements and regulatory developments as well as detailed market trends (including economic, technical, social, employment and quality of service aspects). The report describes the main developments since the previous application report adopted in October 2006 and covers the reporting period 2006 – 2008.

The following main regulatory developments can be observed during the reporting period:

  • Germany fully opened its postal market as of 1 January 2008.
  • The Netherlands, where full market opening had been envisaged, has now postponed liberalisation without setting any concrete date for full market opening.
  • As regards the development of competition in the postal sector, there is now a trend towards (mandatory or negotiated) access to the delivery network by competitors.
  • Progress towards reducing legal barriers to entry and levelling the playing field has been mixed. The distortive effect of the VAT postal exemptions on competition has largely remained, even though the Commission proposed a relevant amendment of the 6th VAT directive in 2003. The lack of access to letterboxes by competitor postal operators is still a crucial issue in some Member States. Authorisation and licensing procedures and related conditions are not always conducive to the development of competition.

Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council of 18 October 2006 on the application of the Postal Directive (Directive 97/67/EC as amended by Directive 2002/39/EC) [COM(2006) 595 final – not published in the OJ].
The third report accompanied the proposal of thethird postal directive and was based on the conclusion that postal services are an important element of the internal market for services, which are included in the framework of the Lisbon Strategy as a source for economic growth and job creation.

The third report concluded that all the intermediate policy results of the postal directive have been achieved in the reporting period (2005-2006): firstly, monopolies have been progressively reduced by either implementing the gradual market opening calendar enshrined in the postal directive (e.g. reduction of the reserved area to 50g on 1 January 2006) or by additionally opening important segments (such as direct mail) or fully opening the postal market (UK, SE, FI). Secondly, competition has grown and in the most advanced Member States the market shares of the incumbents have been reduced to around 90 % and the perceived degree of competition has generally grown between 2000 and 2005. Thirdly, universal service providers have restructured and successfully adapted to the regulatory and market developments. This is underpinned by the generally positive trend as regards overall revenue and profitability growth. Fourthly, the quality of service has improved, consumer satisfaction is high and the universal service has been maintained.

Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council of 23 March 2005 on the application of the Postal Directive (Directive 97/67/EC as amended by Directive 2002/39/EC) [COM(2005) 102 final – Official Journal C 123 of 21.5.2005].
This second report confirms that, overall, postal sector reform in the EU has made considerable progress. Although not yet completed, it has already resulted in a number of significant improvements, particularly concerning quality of service, improved business efficiency and the separation of regulators from operators. Nevertheless, the practical implementation of some of the more complex regulatory requirements of the postal directive (tariff control, transparency of accounts, authorisation and licensing) still requires further efforts. Moreover, as far as the market in postal services is concerned, the Commission has found that competition is not yet in place and that regulatory action is needed to counter the continued existence of inequalities between Member States, particularly in the area of tax liabilities. The perspectives for the future include a clear challenge for operators to seize all the opportunities available in order to pursue further modernisation in the sector. There is a need to respect the timetable set in the directive, for careful monitoring of regulatory developments, for intensified cooperation between the Member States and the Commission and for an in-depth debate on future postal policy.

Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of the Postal Directive (Directive 97/67/EC) [COM(2002) 632 final – not published in the Official Journal].
In 2000, postal services in the EU generated revenues of approximately 85 billion euros and directly employed over 1.6 million people. The postal directive has had major repercussions on the development of the postal services market. In establishing a minimum universal postal service, it guarantees the maintenance of a service that is of public interest, in the framework of the future development of the market. Furthermore, the postal directive has contributed to improving the quality of service and reducing the impact of border effects. It has achieved this by encouraging the adoption of common European standards and increased the quality of service, thanks to measures such as the definition of service objectives (note, for example, that in 2001, 92.3 % of EU cross-border priority mail was delivered within three days of posting). Even if some compliance problems persist as regards the independence of national regulatory authorities, the postal directive has also succeeded in establishing a minimum level of harmonisation in the market. The postal directive has paved the way for a larger opening up of the market and this prospect has helped speed up the rhythm of postal reforms at national level and the restructuring of the postal service, in the interests of greater efficiency and profitability.

Council resolution of 7 February 1994 on the development of Community postal services [Official Journal C 48 of 16.02.1994].

A new framework for electronic communications services

A new framework for electronic communications services

Outline of the Community (European Union) legislation about A new framework for electronic communications services

Topics

These categories group together and put in context the legislative and non-legislative initiatives which deal with the same topic.

Internal market > Single market for services

A new framework for electronic communications services

To review European Union regulation in the telecommunications sector and propose the main elements of a new framework for communications infrastructure and associated services.

2) Document or Iniciative

Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions of 10 November 1999. Towards a new framework for Electronic Communications infrastructure and associated services – The 1999 Communications Review [COM(1999) 539 final, 10.11.1999 – Not published in the Official Journal].

3) Summary

The liberalisation of Europe’s telecommunications market reached its peak on 1 January 1998 with the complete liberalisation of all telecommunications networks and services in virtually all Member States. The developments in technology, innovation in the services being offered, price reductions and improvements in quality brought about by the introduction of competition provided the basis for Europe’s transition to the Information Society. The convergence of the telecommunications, broadcasting and IT sectors is reshaping the communications market; in particular the convergence of fixed, mobile, terrestrial and satellite communications, and communication and positioning/location systems. From the point of view of communications infrastructure and related services, convergence makes the traditional separation of regulatory functions between these sectors increasingly inappropriate and calls for a coherent regulatory regime.

In this context, this Communication presents a review of the current regulatory framework for communications and responds to the need for a more horizontal approach to regulation of communications infrastructure revealed in the course of the consultation on convergence. It also takes account of the key ideas in, for example, the consultation on the Radio Spectrum Green Paper, the report on the development of the market for digital television in the European Union and the fifth report on the implementation of the telecommunications regulatory package.

Five principles will underpin the new regulatory framework and govern regulatory action at Community and national level. They are that the future regulation should:

  • be based on clearly defined policy objectives,
  • be the minimum necessary to meet those objectives (for example by introducing mechanisms to reduce regulation further where policy objectives are achieved by competition),
  • further enhance legal certainty in a dynamic market,
  • aim to be technologically neutral (not to impose, nor discriminate in favour of the use of a particular type of technology, but ensure that the same service is regulated in an equivalent manner, irrespective of the means by which it is delivered),
  • be enforced as closely as possible to the activities being regulated (whether regulation has been agreed globally, regionally or nationally).

Taking into account the five principles, the Commission sees the new regulatory framework structured along the following lines:

  • Community sector-specific legislation. This will consist of a Framework Directive identifying general and specific policy objectives, and four specific directives on licensing, access and interconnection, universal service, privacy and data protection. (This represents a substantial simplification of the current framework, reducing the number of legal measures from twenty to six).
  • Non-binding accompanying measures.
  • Competition rules: greater reliance on the general competition rules of the Treaty, allowing much of the sectoral regulation to be replaced as competition becomes effective.

In parallel, the Directives based on Article 86 of the Treaty will be simplified and codified into one legal measure.

Starting from these general principles, this Communication sets out the Commission’s provisional positions on each area of its regulatory policy, and seeks the views of all interested parties on its proposals by 15 February 2000. In the light of the comments received, the Commission will produce proposals to amend the current framework in the first half of 2000.

With regard to binding, sector-specific legislation, the future regulatory framework provides for the elaboration of a new Framework Directive which will, inter alia:

  • identify specific policy objectives for Member States,
  • guarantee specific consumer rights (for example dispute resolution procedures, emergency call numbers, increased transparency and access to information, etc.),
  • ensure an appropriate level of interoperability for communications services and equipment,
  • set out the rights, responsibilities, decision making powers and procedures of NRAs (National Regulatory Authorities),
  • establish and lay down rules for the new Communications Committee and High Level Communications Group.

The Framework Directive will be accompanied by four specific directives based on Article 95 of the Treaty:

  • Directive on authorisations and licensing (including rules for the effective management of, and access to, scarce resources),
  • Directive on the provision of universal service, incorporating elements of the current Voice Telephony Directive and Interconnection Directive,
  • Directive on access and interconnection (based on the current Interconnection Directive and the TV Standards Directive),
  • Directive on data processing and protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (directive updated and clarified to take account of technological developments.

Competition Law will become increasingly important in this sector and replace much of the sectoral regulation once competition becomes established on the market.

This Communication also proposes substantial amendments to existing legislation designed to deal with problems relevant to the new regulatory framework.
These changes concern the following aspects:

Licences and authorisations

The Commission stresses the need to reduce administrative barriers to market entry with a view to promoting a competitive European market for telecommunications services. In particular, it proposes:

  • using general authorisations as the basis for licensing communication networks and services, with specific authorisations reserved for the assignment of radio spectrum and numbers,
  • applying a complete and coherent policy framework to communications infrastructure, including broadcasting networks,
  • ensuring that the fees for authorisations cover only justifiable and relevant administrative costs,
  • continuing to authorise the communications services provided via the Internet in an equivalent manner to other communications services (i.e. no specific regulation for the Internet).

Access and interconnection

In Community legislation, “access” is a generic concept covering all forms of access to publicly available networks and services, whereas “interconnection” refers to the physical and logical linking of networks. Rules for access and interconnection ensure interoperability and are essential to allow competition to become established. The Commission recognises the fundamental importance of the provision of access and interconnection services, and therefore proposes:

  • maintaining specific Community measures which cover both access and interconnection, building on the principles set out in the Interconnection Directive and the TV Standards Directive,
  • in the case of access to network infrastructure, placing responsibility on National Regulatory Authorities (NRAs) to deal with specific access issues; requiring infrastructure owners with significant market power to negotiate on commercial terms in respect of requests for access; maintaining the possibility of NRA intervention to resolve disputes,
  • in the case of interconnection, maintaining the requirement for cost-orientated interconnection in directives (hard law) but interpreting this concept through Commission recommendations,
  • drawing up Recommendations on access, where appropriate, in particular a Recommendation to Member States on the technical and economic aspects of local loop unbundling (local loops are the links connecting customers’ premises to a telecommunications network). The Commission takes the view that the availability of unbundled access to local loops would strengthen competition and could also speed up the introduction of Internet access services. In this context, it adopted a Recommendation on the interconnection of leased lines on 24 November which, inter alia, encourages Member States to take measures (such as unbundling the local loop and licensing wireless local loops) to increase competition for access to the local network,
  • extending the current standardisation framework for telecoms to cover all communications infrastructure and associated services,
  • making carrier selection (a form of network access mandatory for fixed networks under the current regulatory framework for interconnection) available to mobile users by placing obligations on mobile operators with significant market power.

Management of radio spectrum

Given the considerable demand for the use of the radio spectrum in a number of sectors such as telecommunications, but also transport, public safety, broadcasting and R&D, the current methods of allocating frequencies and licences are proving inefficient. In the light of the importance of the radio spectrum for the development of communications services, and its limited availability, the Commission takes the view that

  • administrative pricing and auctioning of radio spectrum can be a means of ensuring an efficient use of the spectrum,
  • the provisions of the current Licensing Directive should be amended to permit Member States to make provision for radio spectrum secondary trading to encourage the efficient use of radio spectrum.

Universal service

The current regulatory framework requires NRAs to place obligations on network operators to ensure that a defined minimum set of services of a specified quality are available to all, independent of their geographical location, at an affordable price. Universal service, as currently defined in Community legislation, includes the provision of voice telephony, fax and voice band data transmission via modems (i.e. access to the Internet).

The Commission recognises the importance of universal service and proposes:

  • maintaining the current definition and scope of universal service at this stage (but proposes to define criteria for its possible extension, as well as mechanisms for periodic review),
  • developing pricing principles at EU level to ensure the affordability of universal service.

The interests of users and consumers

The current regulatory framework contains a number of provisions which aim to protect the interests of users and consumers in general. There are also a number of horizontal consumer protection directives at European level which apply to all sectors, including telecommunications. In this sector, the Commission proposes:

  • updating and clarifying the Telecoms Data Protection Directive to take account of technological developments
  • making the extension of the European emergency call number 112 obligatory,
  • maintaining and consolidating existing obligations with regard to complaint handling and dispute settlement procedures,
  • increasing the transparency of information (particularly on tariffs) for consumers,
  • requiring suppliers to publish information on quality of service,
  • repealing the Leased Lines Directive 92/44/EC once there is adequate choice of leased lines for all users and leased line prices are competitive.

Numbering, naming and addressing

Current Community legislation identifies elements of a harmonised approach to numbering, naming and addressing, and stresses the importance of guaranteeing Europe-wide end-to-end interconnection of users and interoperability of services. In this connection, the Commission proposes:

  • not to pursue specific regulatory measures at this stage, with respect to Internet naming and addressing,
  • extending the availability of operator number portability to mobile users, but not to require operator number portability between fixed and mobile networks at this stage.

Specific competition issues

Sector-specific rules, in conjunction with the application of competition rules, facilitate market entry where the incumbent operators continue to have strong positions, and serve to ensure that new entrants can compete effectively. The key issue is therefore to establish the right balance between sector-specific regulation and the competition rules. In particular, it will be appropriate for sector-specific regulation to make more use of competition law concepts like dominant position, under Article 82 of the Treaty, for example in the case of cost-orientation and non-discrimination obligations.

Institutional issues

The regulatory model outlined in this Communication implies increased delegation of decision-making to NRAs with a view to ensuring the implementation of the framework as close as possible to the market in the Member States. The model thus requires a balancing mechanism in the form of greater coordination of the decisions and views of NRAs at European Union level.

In this context, the Commission proposes:

  • replacing the existing two telecommunications committees with a new Communications Committee, drawing on the expertise of a new High Level Communications Group involving the Commission and NRAs to help improve the consistent application of Community legislation and maximise the uniform application of national measures;
  • reviewing existing legal provisions with a view to strengthening the independence of NRAs, ensuring an effective division of responsibilities between the different institutions at national level, improving cooperation between sector-specific and general competition authorities, requiring transparent decision-making procedures at national level.

4) Implementing Measures

Communication – COM(2000) 239 final
Commission communication on the results of the public consultation on the 1999 communications review and orientations for the new regulatory framework

The consultation highlighted broad agreement in respect of some policy proposals and differing views in respect of others. A large majority of interested parties are in favour of the following proposals:

  • maintaining sector specific regulation in parallel with competition policy and abolishing it once objectives have been met;
  • guiding NRAs;
  • decision-making at national level by implementing the regulatory objectives proposed in the communication;
  • covering all communications infrastructure and associated services;
  • achieving greater harmonisation of regulation in the Member States;
  • extending the use of general authorisations for the provision of communications services and networks;
  • ensuring more efficient management of radio spectrum and establishing a group of experts on radio spectrum policy;
  • maintaining the currect scope of universal service;
  • ensuring the availability of local loop unbundling in all Member States;
  • maintaining the current framework for standardisation;
  • updating the current Telecoms Data Protection Directive;
  • withdrawing the Leased Lines Directive once there is adequate competitive supply of leased lines for all consumers;
  • setting out rules for defining markets dynamically when considering obligations for access and interconnection;
  • providing for strong and independent NRAs.

Areas where there were differing views are as follows:

  • funding of NRAs via licence fees;
  • method of selling spectrum and the possibility of allowing secondary trading of spectrum;
  • the proposal to introduce two thresholds for asymmetric obligations in respect of access and interconnection (significant market power (SMP) and dominance);
  • guidelines for affordability of universal service;
  • number portability for mobile users;
  • institutional arrangements (difference of opinion concerning the role of the communications committee and the high-level communications group);
  • areas where specific authorisations are required;
  • user facilities (such as caller location for emergency calls, per call tariff transparency) and quality of service (NRA intervention on quality of service issues).

On the basis of all these considerations, the Commission will propose five Directives in June 2000, comprising a framework Directive and four other specific Directives covering licensing and authorisations, access and interconnection, universal service consumers’ and users’ rights and telecoms data protection. The main principles that the Commission will take into account are as follows:

  • the guidelines already set out in the communication on the review of the regulatory framework;
  • a broad scope taking account of infrastructure and associated services;
  • a system for granting general authorisations;
  • modification of the notion of significant market power;
  • clear definition of the markets where ex ante regulation is required;
  • protection of consumers’ and users’ rights;
  • number portability;
  • revision of the Directive on personal data;
  • access to caller location information for calls to emergency services.

5) Follow-Up Work

Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (Directive on privacy and electronic communications) [Official Journal L 201 of 31 July 2002]

Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive) [Official Journal L 108 of 24.04.2002]

Directive 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services (Authorisation Directive) [Official Journal L 108 of 24.04.2002]

Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (Universal Service Directive) [Official Journal L 108 of 24.04.2002]

Directive 2002/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on access to, and interconnection of, electronic communications networks and associated facilities (Access Directive) [Official Journal L 108 of 24.04.2002]

Decision 676/2002/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a regulatory framework for radio spectrum policy in the European Community (Radio Spectrum Decision) [Official Journal L 108 of 24.04.2002]

 

Common rules for access to the international market for coach and bus services

Common rules for access to the international market for coach and bus services

Outline of the Community (European Union) legislation about Common rules for access to the international market for coach and bus services

Topics

These categories group together and put in context the legislative and non-legislative initiatives which deal with the same topic.

Internal market > Single market for services

Common rules for access to the international market for coach and bus services

Document or Iniciative

Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 on common rules for access to the international market for coach and bus services.

Summary

This regulation incorporates Regulations Nos 684/92 and 12/98 into one single regulation to clarify and simplify the rules for the international carriage of passengers by road within the territory of the European Union (EU) and the conditions under which non-resident carriers may operate national transport services within an EU country.

Freedom to provide services

A carrier is permitted to carry out regular international carriage services, including special regular services * and occasional services * by coach and bus, without discrimination on grounds of nationality or place of establishment if he:

  • is authorised in the EU country of establishment to undertake carriage by means of regular services in accordance with the market access conditions in national law;
  • fulfils the conditions within the EU rules on admission to the occupation of road passenger transport operator in national and international transport operations;
  • meets the legal requirements relating to EU standards for drivers and vehicles.

Community licence

International carriage of passengers by coach and bus is subject to a Community licence issued by the competent authorities of the EU country of establishment. The licence is issued in the name of the carrier for a renewable period of up to 10 years and is non-transferable. EU countries may also decide that the Community licence is valid for national transport operations.

Regular services subject to authorisation

The authorisations are issued in the name of the carrier for a period of up to five years and are non-transferable. However, an authorised carrier, with the consent of the competent authority of the EU country where the point of departure is located, may operate the service through a subcontractor. Authorisations are issued in agreement with the competent authorities of all the EU countries in whose territories passengers are picked up or set down. They must specify the type of service, the route, the stops and timetable, and the period of validity, and entitle their holder to operate regular services in the territories of all EU countries over which the routes of the service pass.

Authorisation, including for renewal and alteration of authorisation, will be granted unless:

  • the applicant cannot provide the necessary services with equipment directly available to him;
  • the applicant has not complied with national or international road transport legislation;
  • the conditions of authorisation have not been complied with in the case of an application for renewal;
  • an EU country decides that the service concerned would seriously affect the viability of a comparable service covered by one or more public service contracts;
  • an EU country decides that the principal purpose of the service is not the carriage of passengers between different EU countries.

Except in the case of force majeure, the operator of a regular service must take all measures to guarantee a transport service that fulfils the standards of continuity, regularity and capacity and complies with the conditions laid down by the competent authority.

Cabotage

Cabotage operations are authorised for the following services:

  • national road passenger services carried out on a temporary basis by a carrier in a host EU country;
  • the picking up and setting down of passengers within the same EU country in the course of a regular international service provided that cabotage is not the principle purpose of the service.

Controls and penalties

Carriers operating a regular service must issue either individual or collective transport tickets indicating the points of departure and arrival, the period of validity of the ticket, and the fare of transport.

In the event of a serious infringement of EU road transport legislation, the competent authorities of the EU country of establishment of the carrier concerned must take appropriate action, which may include a warning or the imposition of administrative penalties. If a non-resident carrier seriously infringes EU road transport legislation, the EU country in which the infringement is ascertained will send the competent authorities of the carrier’s EU country of establishment a description of the infringement, the category, type and seriousness of the infringement, and the penalties imposed. All serious infringements must be recorded in the national electronic register of road transport undertakings.

Key terms used in the act
  • Special regular services: regular services, by whomsoever organised, which provide for the carriage of specified categories of passengers to the exclusion of other passengers.
  • Occasional services: services which do not fall within the definition of regular services, including special regular services, and the main characteristic of which is the carriage of groups of passengers constituted on the initiative of the customer or the carrier himself.

References

Act Entry into force Deadline for transposition in the Member States Official Journal
Regulation No 1073/2009

4.12.2009

OJ L 300 of 14.11.2009

New European commitment for services of general interest

New European commitment for services of general interest

Outline of the Community (European Union) legislation about New European commitment for services of general interest

Topics

These categories group together and put in context the legislative and non-legislative initiatives which deal with the same topic.

Internal market > Single market for services

New European commitment for services of general interest

Document or Iniciative

Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, of 20 November 2007, accompanying the Communication on “A single market for 21st century Europe” – Services of general interest, including social services of general interest: a new European commitment [COM(2007) 725 final – not published in the Official Journal].

Summary

The Commission identifies the essential principles which may be applied to Services of General Interest (SGIs) (FR) throughout the whole European Union (EU). This Communication constitutes a reference framework for the governance of, and compliance with, the specificities of SGIs. This is the case before the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon and its Protocol on Services of General Interest.

Diversity of the Services of General Interest

SGIs are subject to public service obligations. It is for the public authorities at national, regional or local level to decide the nature and scope of the SGIs. Public authorities can provide these services themselves or they can entrust the responsibility of providing them to public or private entities.

For its part, the EU retains shared responsibility which enables it to regulate and define the conditions for the operation of SGIs with a European dimension.

The SGIs are divided into two categories and are governed by different European rules:

  • services of general economic interest (SGEIs), which are provided for remuneration, are subject to European internal market and competition rules. However, derogations to these rules may be authorised in order to ensure that the general interest is respected. Certain SGIs have a European dimension, specifically the large network industries (postal services, telecommunications, transport services and the supply of electricity and gas) and are regulated by specific European rules. In addition, European rules relating to public procurement, environmental protection and consumer protection may be applied to them;
  • non-economic services, such as police, justice and statutory social security schemes, are not subject to specific European legislation, nor to the internal market and competition rules.

In practice, the operation of these services often differs from one Member State to another. Furthermore, the distinction between economic and non-economic services requires case-by-case analysis of each activity.

Social services of general interest

The way in which Social Services of General Interest (SSGIs) are provided is generally personalised in order to meet the needs of vulnerable users, and is based on the principle of solidarity and equal access.

They may be of an economic or non-economic nature, including in the case of non-profit making organisations. The definition of economic activity depends essentially on the way in which the activity is provided, organised and financed, and not on the legal status of the service provider.

They are mainly:

  • statutory and complementary social security schemes, covering the main risks of life (health, ageing, occupational accidents, unemployment, retirement and disability);
  • other services provided directly to the person such as social assistance services, employment and training services, social housing or long-term care.

Modernising the European rules

The Commission commits to adopting a series of actions based on the Protocol on Services of General Interest annexed to the Treaty of Lisbon. These actions shall enable the European regulatory framework applicable to SGIs to be consolidated. The actions are based on the following objectives:

  • improving access to information and developing communication tools, such as the creation of an interactive information service or a single market assistance service;
  • adopting sectoral policies, specifically in the fields of energy, transport, e-communication, and postal, social and health services;
  • monitoring actions to guarantee quality, transparency and good progress.

Context

This Communication follows on from the 2004 Commission White Paper and the 2006 opinion of the Parliament which contributed to the debate and converging views on the role and approach of the EU with regard to SGIs. It also draws on the results of the public consultation on social services of general interest initiated in 2006.

Related Acts

Commission Staff Working Document – Guide to the application of the European Union rules on state aid, public procurement and the internal market to services of general economic interest, and in particular to social services of general interest [SEC(2010) 1545final – Not published in the Official Journal].

The Commission publishes a guide aimed at clarifying the European rules applicable to Services of General Interest and to Social Services of General Interest. The Commission specifies the rules relating to the freedom of establishment and the freedom to provide services in the internal market, to competition, to the Service Directive, to State aid, to public procurement and to the service concessions of public authorities.

Competition in professional services

Competition in professional services

Outline of the Community (European Union) legislation about Competition in professional services

Topics

These categories group together and put in context the legislative and non-legislative initiatives which deal with the same topic.

Internal market > Single market for services

Competition in professional services

Document or Iniciative

Commission communication of 9 February 2004 entitled “Report on Competition in Professional Services” [COM(2004) 83 final – Not published in the Official Journal]

Summary

Professional services have an important role to play in improving the competitiveness of the European economy with the result that their quality and competitiveness have important spill-over effects. The disappearance of anti-competitive regulatory restrictions in this sector would mean that consumers could be offered more competitive and better-quality services on advantageous terms.

TheCommission report shows the need to take action in the field of the professions from a competition policy perspective, to provide information on what the Commission has done so far and to present its interim findings on key restrictions and their alleged general interest justifications and on the Community legal framework within which those restrictions have to be analysed. Finally, it proposes a future course of action aimed at encouraging the elimination of unjustified restrictions.

Restrictive regulation of professional services

At present, the professional services sector is characterised by either state regulation or self-regulation by professional bodies.

The Commission has analysed the markets in which lawyers, notaries, accountants, architects, engineers and pharmacists operate in the European Union and has identified five main categories of national legislation or self-regulation that restrict competition. These are:

  • Fixed prices: These are probably the regulatory instrument likely to have the most detrimental effects on competition, eradicating or seriously reducing the benefits that competitive markets deliver for consumers, particularly in terms of price choice. In most Member States, fees for professional services are negotiated freely between practitioners and clients. However, in a small number of cases the Commission has observed the existence of fixed prices (e.g. in Germany for tax consultants), minimum prices (e.g. in Italy and Germany for architects) and maximum prices (e.g. in Italy for lawyers). Although in some cases maximum prices might protect consumers from excessive charges, the Commission considers that less restrictive mechanisms (such as improved information on the services provided) could be put in place.
  • Recommended prices: These have a significant negative effect on competition since they may facilitate the coordination of prices between service providers and/or mislead consumers about reasonable price levels. The Commission found that in a minority of Member States (e.g. in Austria and Belgium) recommended prices are published for certain legal, accountancy, architectural and engineering services.
  • Advertising restrictions: Advertising may facilitate competition by informing consumers about different products and allowing them to make better-informed purchasing decisions. It is also widely recognised that advertising, and in particular comparative advertising, can be a crucial competitive tool for new firms entering the market and for existing firms wanting to launch new products. However, a large number of the EU professions are subject to sector-specific advertising regulation. In some cases (e.g. in France for notaries), advertising of any kind is prohibited. In others, specific media or advertising methods such as radio advertising, television advertising, “cold calling” or specific types of advertising content are prohibited. In certain cases, there is a lack of clarity in existing advertising regulations, and this, in itself, may deter professionals from employing certain advertising methods.
  • Entry restrictions and reserved rights: Excessive licensing regulation is likely to reduce the supply of service providers, with negative consequences for competition and quality of service. The professions are subject to qualitative entry restrictions in most Member States. These can take the form of minimum periods of education, professional examinations and minimum periods of professional experience. In many cases, entry restrictions are coupled with reserved rights to provide certain services. In some Member States the pharmacist and notary professions are even subject to quantitative entry restrictions based on demographic or geographical criteria. Entry restrictions, combined with reserved rights, ensure that only practitioners with appropriate qualifications and skills can carry out certain tasks. The EU is currently putting the finishing touches to a proposal for a directive designed to reform the system for recognising professional qualifications. The purpose of this reform, which is aimed at pharmacists and architects, among other professions, is to create a single legal framework to further liberalise the services sector and facilitate the recognition of qualifications in Europe.
  • Regulations governing business structure and multidisciplinary practices: Business structure regulations may have a negative economic impact if they prevent providers from developing new services or cost-efficient business models. For example, these regulations might prevent lawyers and accountants from providing integrated legal and accountancy advice for tax issues or prevent the development of one-stop shops for professional services in rural areas. Certain ownership regulations can also reduce access to capital in professional services markets, hindering new entry and expansion. A number of professions in the EU are subject to sector-specific regulations on business structure. These regulations can restrict the ownership structure of professional services companies, the scope for collaboration with other professions and, in some cases, the opening of branches, franchises or chains.

There are essentially three reasons for this regulation of professional services:

  • “asymmetry of information”, i.e. the difference in the information available to consumers and service providers: a defining feature of professional services is that they require practitioners to possess a high level of technical knowledge. Consumers may not have this knowledge and therefore find it difficult to judge the quality of the services they purchase.
  • “externalities”: the provision of a service may have an impact on third parties. Rules are therefore needed to ensure that both service providers and purchasers take proper account of these external effects.
  • the concept of “public goods”: certain professional services are deemed to be in the public good since they are of value for society in general, for example, the correct administration of justice or the development of high-quality urban environments.

While the Commission acknowledges that some regulation in this sector is justified, it believes that in some cases more pro-competitive mechanisms can and should be used instead of certain traditional restrictive rules.

Possible application of the EC competition rules

From the perspective of Community competition law, a distinction must be made between the liability of professional bodies and that of Member States.

Regulations adopted by professional bodies are decisions of associations of undertakings that may be caught by Article 81 of the EC Treaty. However, regulations that are objectively necessary to guarantee the proper practice of the profession, as organised in the Member State concerned, fall outside the scope of the prohibition.

Article 81 is, in itself, concerned solely with the conduct of undertakings and not with laws or rules emanating from Member States. Nonetheless, read in conjunction with the second paragraph of Article 10 (prohibiting measures by Member States which could jeopardise the attainment of the objectives of the Treaty) and with Article 3(1)(g) of the Treaty (which justifies intervention by the Community in order to ensure that competition in the internal market is not distorted), Article 81 prohibits Member States from introducing or maintaining in force measures, even of a legislative or regulatory nature, which may render ineffective the competition rules applicable to undertakings.

Where a State delegates its policy-making power to a professional association without sufficient safeguards, i.e. without clearly indicating the public interest objectives that must be complied with, without retaining the last word and without exercising control of implementation, the Member State can be held liable for any resulting infringement. Measures adopted by professional associations and legislative or regulatory instruments adopted by public authorities may therefore give rise to the liability of the members of the professions and of their associations under Article 81 of the Treaty and of Member States under Articles 10 and 81 of the Treaty.

Position of the Commission and proposed actions

A significant body of empirical research shows the negative effects that excessive or outdated restrictive regulations may have for consumers. Such regulations may eliminate or limit competition between service providers and thus reduce the incentives for professionals to work, in a cost-efficient manner, to lower prices, to increase quality or to offer innovative services.

The Commission therefore acknowledges that some regulation in this sector is justified, but it believes that in some cases more pro-competitive mechanisms can and should be used instead of certain traditional restrictive rules. There are a variety of less restrictive mechanisms to maintain quality and protect consumers. For example, measures to improve the availability and quality of information about professional services could help empower consumers to make more informed purchasing decisions.

The Commission is therefore inviting the regulatory authorities of the Member States to review the national legislation restricting professional services. They should consider whether the existing restrictions pursue a clearly articulated and legitimate public interest objective, whether they are necessary to achieve that objective, and whether there are no less restrictive means to achieve this. The Commission is also inviting all professional bodies to undertake a similar review of their rules and regulations. They should apply the same proportionality test as the regulatory authorities of the Member States and, where necessary, change existing rules or propose changes.

With the entry into force of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 in May 2004, the national competition authorities and the national courts will have a more prominent role in assessing the legality of rules and regulations in the professions. In so far as competition restrictions are imposed within Member States, administrative enforcement of EC competition rules in the professions should be mainly the task of national competition authorities, although the Commission will continue to carry out casework where appropriate. The Commission also proposes discussing with national regulatory authorities whether the existing regulations are necessary, proportionate and justified.

In 2005 the Commission will report on the progress achieved in eliminating the restrictions identified above or on the factors justifying these rules. To this end, it will contact the regulatory authorities by the end of the year to ask them to report on any measures they have adopted that fall within the scope of this report. Any explicit justification of the restrictive rules which they wish to maintain should then be communicated to the Commission.

Background

Reform of the restrictive rules in the professional services sector was initiated in 2003 with the publication of a study commissioned by the Directorate-General for Competition on the economic impact of regulation of the professions in the different Member States. Commission action on this front complements the directive on services in the internal market. The Commission presented a further progress report [COM(2005) 405 final] in 2005.

Related Acts

Commission communication to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions of 5 September entitled “Professional Services – Scope for more reform”: Follow-up to the Report on Competition in Professional Services (COM (2004) 83 of 9 February 2004), [COM(2005) 405 final – Not published in the Official Journal]

In its communication the Commission makes a first assessment of the reform of unjustified restrictions in the professional services sector. It welcomes the progress made in some of the Member States but is concerned by the all too frequent persistence of unjustified regulation which seriously impedes competition in many others. The analytical work underway in most of them, which should lead to substantive reform, is encouraging. But some countries report no reform activity as yet.

The Commission consequently urges the Member States to step up their efforts to increase pro-competitive reform, advocating a more refined analysis of the markets concerned in order to arrive at a clearer definition of the general interest and to ensure better targeted regulation. Occasional users (individuals) of professional services may have a greater need of carefully targeted regulatory protection than the main users (business and the public sector). The position with respect to small business users is not entirely clear and needs to be analysed further.

Strong political backing at national level and greater input from the professions are essential to the reform process. The Commission will continue to act as a facilitator in this exercise, helping to spread best practice.

This summary is for information only. It is not designed to interpret or replace the reference document, which remains the only binding legal text.

Goods: Non-resident carriers in the national market

Goods: Non-resident carriers in the national market

Outline of the Community (European Union) legislation about Goods: Non-resident carriers in the national market

Topics

These categories group together and put in context the legislative and non-legislative initiatives which deal with the same topic.

Internal market > Single market for services

Goods: Non-resident carriers in the national market

Document or Iniciative

Council Regulation (EEC) No 3118/93 of 25 October 1993 laying down the conditions under which non-resident carriers may operate national road haulage services within a Member State [See amending acts].

Summary

Community carriers holding a Community authorisation are permitted to carry out road haulage operations in other Member States without being based or established there. If the driver is a national of a non-member country, he/she must carry a driver attestation.

Such operations, known as cabotage, are exempt from any quantity restrictions on market access.

Carriers who so wish may obtain a cabotage authorisation by applying to the Member State in which the haulage business is established. The authorisation can be used for one vehicle only.

In principle, cabotage operations are covered by national legislation in the following areas:

  • the prices and conditions governing the transport contract;
  • standards relating to weights and measures;
  • requirements relating to the carriage of certain categories of goods;
  • driving and rest time for drivers;
  • VAT on transport services.

The host Member State must, however, when applying its national provisions, take account of the proportionality principle.

In the event of a market disturbance arising from cabotage operations, the Commission may take any necessary safeguard measures. It takes any such measures after examining the situation and collecting relevant data for monitoring market developments.

The Regulation also lays down the conditions under which the Member States must assist one another in implementing it.

Background

The cabotage regime has applied fully since 30 June 1998. It was phased in over the period 1 January 1994 to 30 June 1998.

References

Act Entry into force – Date of expiry Deadline for transposition in the Member States Official Journal
Regulation (EC) No 3118/93 1.1994 OJ L 279, 12.11.1993
Amending act(s) Entry into force Deadline for transposition in the Member States Official Journal
Regulation (EC) No 3315/94 1.1.1995 OJ L 350, 31.12.1994
Regulation (EC) No 484/2002 19.3.2002 OJ L 76, 19.3.2002

Related Acts

Commission Regulation (EC) No 792/94 of 8 April 1994 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3118/93 to road haulage operators on own account [Official Journal L 92, 9.4.1994].
This Regulation lays down detailed rules for applying Article 1(4) of Regulation (EEC) No 3118/93 with regard to the issuing of cabotage authorisations and their recognition by the Member States.

Commission report of 4 February 1998 on the implementation of Regulation (EEC) No 3118/93 laying down the conditions under which non-resident carriers may operate national road haulage services within a Member State (cabotage) [COM(98) 47 final – not published in the Official Journal].
The report took stock of cabotage activities between 1990 and 1995. The statistics were calculated solely for “hire or reward” carriers.

Commission report of 28 February 2000 on the implementation of Regulation (EEC) No 3118/93 laying down the conditions under which non-resident carriers may operate national road haulage services within a Member State (cabotage) [COM(2000) 105 final – not published in the Official Journal].
The report covered the use of cabotage authorisations up to the end of June 1998, the date on which quantitative restrictions on cabotage were lifted. The geographical scope of the cabotage regime remains that of the European Economic Area (EEA) and the abolition of quantitative restrictions applies to the EEA as a whole. Austria joined the cabotage regime in January 1997.

Common rules for access to the international road haulage market

Common rules for access to the international road haulage market

Outline of the Community (European Union) legislation about Common rules for access to the international road haulage market

Topics

These categories group together and put in context the legislative and non-legislative initiatives which deal with the same topic.

Internal market > Single market for services

Common rules for access to the international road haulage market

Document or Iniciative

Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 on common rules for access to the international road haulage market.

Summary

This regulation applies to the international carriage of goods by road for hire or reward for journeys carried out within the European Union (EU). Where the carriage takes place between an EU country and a non-EU country, this regulation applies to the part of the journey on the territory of any EU country crossed in transit. It is not applicable to the part of the journey on the territory of the EU country of loading or unloading. This regulation also applies to the national carriage of goods by road carried out temporarily by a non-resident haulier *.

International carriage

International carriage is undertaken subject to possession of a Community licence and, if the driver is a non-EU national, in conjunction with a driver attestation.

A Community licence is issued by an EU country to any haulier carrying goods by road for hire or reward which is established in that EU country and is entitled to carry out the international carriage of goods by road in that EU country. The competent authorities of the EU country of establishment issue the Community licence for renewable periods of up to ten years. The licence is issued in the name of the haulier and is non-transferable.

A driver attestation is issued by the competent authorities of the EU country of establishment of the haulier to any haulier who holds a Community licence and who lawfully employs or uses a driver in that EU country who is neither an EU national nor a long-term resident. The driver attestation is valid for a period of up to a maximum of five years.

If the conditions above are not fulfilled, the competent authorities of the EU country of establishment will, by means of a reasoned decision, reject an application for the issue or renewal of a Community licence or the issue of a driver attestation. A Community licence or driver attestation will be withdrawn where the holder either no longer satisfies the conditions above or has supplied incorrect information relating to a licence or attestation application.

Cabotage

Any haulier for hire or reward who is a Community licence holder and whose driver, if a non-EU national, holds a driver attestation, is entitled to carry out cabotage operations *. After the goods concerned in an international carriage have been delivered, the hauliers have seven days in which they may undertake up to three cabotage operations. These three cabotage operations may also be carried out in transited EU countries, with a limit of one operation per country.

National road haulage services undertaken in the host EU country* by a non-resident haulier will only be subject to this regulation if the haulier can produce proof of the incoming international carriage and of each consecutive cabotage operation undertaken.

Cabotage operations are subject to national legislation in the host EU country regarding the:

  • conditions governing the transport contract;
  • weights and dimensions of road vehicles;
  • requirements concerning the carriage of certain categories of goods, in particular dangerous goods, perishable food items and live animals;
  • driving time and rest periods;
  • value added tax (VAT) on transport services.

To prevent discrimination on grounds of nationality or place of establishment, the above laws and regulations are applied equally to non-resident hauliers as they are to hauliers established in the host EU country.

Safeguard measures may be adopted by the Commission in the event of serious disturbance of national transport markets in a given geographical area either due to or aggravated by cabotage.

Sanctioning of infringements

If a haulier seriously infringes EU road transport legislation, the competent authorities of the EU country of establishment of the haulier will take the appropriate action which could constitute a warning, or may involve administrative penalties such as a withdrawal of the Community licence. If a non-resident haulier seriously infringes EU road transport legislation, the EU country in which the infringement is ascertained will inform the competent authorities of the haulier’s EU country of establishment of their final decision on the matter, including a description of the infringement, the category, type and seriousness of the infringement, and the penalties imposed. All serious infringements must be recorded in the national electronic register of road transport undertakings.

This regulation repeals Regulations Nos 881/92, 3118/93 and 2006/94.

Key terms used in the act
  • Non-resident haulier: a road haulage undertaking which operates in a host EU country.
  • Cabotage operations: national carriage for hire or reward carried out on a temporary basis in a host EU country, in conformity with this regulation.
  • Host EU country: an EU country in which a haulier operates other than the haulier’s EU country of establishment.

References

Act Entry into force Deadline for transposition in the Member States Official Journal
Regulation No 1072/2009

4.12.2009

OJ L 300 of 14.11.2009

White Paper on services of general interest

White Paper on services of general interest

Outline of the Community (European Union) legislation about White Paper on services of general interest

Topics

These categories group together and put in context the legislative and non-legislative initiatives which deal with the same topic.

Internal market > Single market for services

White Paper on services of general interest

Document or Iniciative

Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions of 12 May 2004 entitled “White Paper on services of general interest” [COM(2004) 374 final – Not yet published in the Official Journal].

Summary

This White Paper presents the Commission’s conclusions following a broad public consultation launched on the basis of the Green Paper. The consultation showed up significant differences in points of view and outlook. Nevertheless, a consensus seems to have emerged on the need to ensure the harmonious combination of market mechanisms and public service missions. The White Paper sets out the Commission’s approach in developing a positive role for the European Union in fostering the development of high-quality services of general interest and presents the main elements of a strategy aimed at ensuring that all citizens and enterprises in the Union have access to high-quality and affordable services.

In submitting this White Paper, the Commission does not intend to close the debate that has developed at European level. Its aim is to make a contribution to the ongoing discussion and take it further by defining the Union’s role and a framework that allows these services to function properly.

SERVICES OF GENERAL INTEREST: AN ESSENTIAL COMPONENT OF THE EUROPEAN MODEL AND A SHARED RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PUBLIC AUTHORITIES IN THE EUROPEAN UNION

The White Paper stresses the importance of services of general interest as one of the pillars of the European model of society and the need to ensure the provision of high-quality and affordable services of general interest to all citizens and enterprises in the European Union. In the Union, services of general interest remain essential for ensuring social and territorial cohesion and for the competitiveness of the European economy.

While the provision of services of general interest can be organised in cooperation with the private sector or entrusted to private or public undertakings, the definition of public service obligations and missions remains a task for the public authorities at the relevant level. The relevant public authorities are also responsible for market regulation and for ensuring that operators accomplish the public service missions entrusted to them.

In this context, the White Paper states that responsibility for services of general interest is shared between the Union and its Member States. This shared responsibility is the concept underlying Article 16 of the EC Treaty, which confers responsibility upon the Community and the Member States to ensure, each within their respective powers, that their policies enable operators of services of general economic interest to fulfil their missions. The right of the Member States to assign specific public service obligations to economic operators and to ensure compliance is also implicitly recognised in Article 86(2) of the EC Treaty.

The EC Treaty gives the Community a range of resources to ensure that users have access to high-quality, affordable services of general interest in the European Union. The Commission takes the view that its powers are appropriate and sufficient for the maintenance and development of effective services throughout the Union. Nevertheless, it is primarily for the relevant national, regional and local authorities to define, organise, finance and monitor services of general interest.

THE GUIDING PRINCIPLES OF THE COMMISSION’S APPROACH

The Commission’s approach is based on a number of principles that are reflected in the Community’s sectoral policies and can be clarified on the basis of the results of the debate on the Green Paper:

  • Enabling public authorities to operate close to citizens:
    The Commission respects the essential role of the Member States and of regional and local authorities in the area of services of general interest. The Community’s policies on services of general interest are based on various degrees of action and the use of various instruments, in line with the principle of subsidiarity.
  • Achieving public service objectives within competitive open markets:

    An open and competitive internal market, on the one hand, and the development of high-quality, accessible and affordable services of general interest, on the other, are compatible objectives.
  • Ensuring cohesion and universal access:

    The access of all citizens and enterprises to affordable, high-quality services of general interest throughout the territory of the Member States is essential for the promotion of social and territorial cohesion in the European Union, including the reduction of obstacles caused by the lack of accessibility of the outermost regions.
  • Maintaining a high level of quality, security and safety:

    The Commission wishes to guarantee, in addition to the supply of high-quality services of general interest, the physical safety of consumers and users, everyone involved in the production and delivery of these services and the general public, and, in particular, provide protection against possible threats such as terrorist attacks or environmental disasters.
  • Ensuring consumer and user rights:
    These include, in particular, access to services, in particular cross-border services, throughout the territory of the Union and for all groups of the population, affordability of services, including special schemes for persons on low incomes, physical safety, security and reliability, continuity, high quality, choice, transparency and access to information from providers and regulators.
  • Monitoring and evaluating performance:

    The Commission takes the view that systematic evaluation and monitoring is vital for maintaining and developing high-quality, accessible, affordable and efficient services of general interest in the European Union. The evaluation should be multidimensional and focus on all the legal, economic, social and environmental aspects. It should also take into account the features of the sector evaluated and situations specific to the various Member States and their regions.
  • Respecting the diversity of services and situations:

    The diversity of services must be maintained because of the different needs and preferences of users and consumers resulting from different economic, social, geographical or cultural situations. This is true in particular for social services, health care and broadcasting.
  • Increasing transparency:

    The principle of transparency is a key concept for the development and implementation of public policies regarding services of general interest. It ensures that public authorities can exercise their responsibilities and that democratic choices can be made and are respected. The principle should apply to all aspects of delivery and cover the definition of public service missions, the organisation, financing and regulation of services, as well as their production and evaluation, including complaint-handling mechanisms.
  • Providing legal certainty:
    The Commission is aware that the application of Community law to services of general interest could raise complex issues. It is therefore going to pursue an ongoing project to improve legal certainty associated with the application of Community law in the provision of services of general interest. It has already accomplished the modernisation of the existing public procurement rules and launched initiatives in the areas of state aid and public-private partnerships.

NEW APPROACHES FOR A COHERENT POLICY

One of the main questions in the public discussion concerned the need for a framework directive on services of general interest. The views expressed on this subject in the public consultation were divided, a number of Member States and the European Parliament being sceptical on the issue.

It is therefore uncertain whether a framework directive would be the best route to follow at this stage and would bring sufficient added value. Consequently, the Commission concludes that it would be best not to present a proposal for the time being. Rather, it will pursue and develop its sectoral approach by proposing, where necessary and appropriate, sector-specific rules that allow account to be taken of the specific requirements and situations in each sector.

The Commission will re-examine the feasibility and necessity of a framework law on services of general interest when the Constitutional Treaty comes into force, in particular the new legal basis introduced by Article III-122 which states that: “Without prejudice to Articles III-55, III-56 and III-136, and given the place occupied by services of general economic interest as services to which all in the Union attribute value as well as their role in promoting social and territorial cohesion, the Union and the Member States, each within their respective powers and within the scope of application of the Constitution, shall take care that such services operate on the basis of principles and conditions, in particular economic and financial, which enable them to fulfil their missions. European laws shall define these principles and conditions.” In addition, the Commission will review the situation of services of general interest in the European Union and the need for any horizontal measures in 2005. It plans to present a report of its findings by the end of 2005.

On the basis of the results of the public consultation, the Commission also considers it necessary to further clarify and simplify the legal framework for the financing of public service obligations. It intends to adopt a package of measures to that effect by July 2005 at the latest. Most elements of this package have already been submitted as drafts for consultation.

Furthermore, the public debate highlighted the need for a clear and transparent framework for the selection of undertakings entrusted with a service of general interest. The Commission intends to examine the EU legislation ensuring the transparent award of service concessions. It has therefore launched a consultation on the procurement aspects of public-private partnerships.

The Green Paper also generated considerable interest among stakeholders in the area of social and health services, who expressed a need for greater predictability and clarity to ensure a smooth development of these services. The Commission takes the view that it is useful to develop a systematic approach in order to identify and recognise the specific characteristics of social and health services of general interest and to clarify the framework in which they operate and can be modernised. This approach will be set out in a Communication on social services of general interest, including health services, to be adopted in the course of 2005.

Evaluating the operation of the services, at both Community and national level, is essential to ensure the development of high-quality services of general interest that are accessible and affordable in an environment undergoing constant change. The Commission has undertaken to intensify and improve its evaluation activities in the field of services of general interest.

On an internal level, the sectoral regulations put in place at Community level concern the large network industries. In the Commission’s view, the public consultation on the Green Paper has confirmed this approach. It will take into account the results of this consultation in the examinations of the various sectors.

On an international level, the Commission is determined to ensure consistency between the Community’s internal rules and the obligations on itself and the Member States pursuant to international trade agreements. It also wishes to promote services of general interest in development co-operation.

Related Acts

European Parliament Resolution of 13 January 2004 on the Green Paper on services of general interest [A5-0484/2003].

Parliament welcomes the Commission Green Paper and calls on the Commission to present a follow-up by April 2004 at the latest. It takes the view that certain services of general interest should be excluded from the scope of the competition rules, including health, education and social housing, as well as services of general interest aiming to maintain or increase plurality of information and cultural diversity. Moreover, Parliament calls on the Commission to defend this position at WTO negotiations and negotiations on the General Agreement on Trade in Services. It considers that it is neither possible nor relevant to draw up common definitions of services of general interest, or of the public-service obligations resulting from them, but that the European Union must lay down common principles, including the following: universality and equality of access, continuity, security and adaptability; quality, efficiency and affordability, transparency, protection of less well-off social groups, protection of users, consumers and the environment, and citizen participation, taking into account circumstances which are specific to each sector. It stresses the need to ensure that competition rules are compatible with public service obligations, and is opposed to liberalisation of the water supply. Parliament takes the view that water and waste services should not be subject to Community sectoral directives, but that the Union should keep its full responsibility for these sectors as regards quality and environment protection standards.

Commission Green Paper of 21 May 2003 on services of general interest [COM(2003) 270 final – Official Journal C 76 of 25.03.2004].

The Commission, in this Green Paper, undertakes to conduct a complete review of its policies on services of general interest. Its objective is to organise an open debate on the global role of the Union in the definition of the objectives of general interest pursued by these services and on how they are organised, funded and evaluated. The Green Paper also reaffirms the significant contribution of the internal market and competition rules to modernising and improving the quality and efficiency of many public services, to the benefit of Europe’s citizens and businesses. It deals with globalisation and liberalisation, raising the question of whether a general legislative framework should be established at Community level for services of general interest, and seeks to deal with these issues by asking questions about: the impact of any additional Community initiatives to implement the treaty, in full respect of the principle of subsidiarity; the principles likely to be incorporated in any framework legislation on services of general interest and the actual added value of legislation of that kind; the definition of good governance in the organisation, regulation, funding and evaluation of services of general interest; an examination of any new measure likely to be taken to increase legal certainty and facilitate consistent, harmonious coordination between the objective of safeguarding high-quality services of general interest and the rigorous application of the competition and internal market rules.